The Official Liverpool Thread, Volume 3
Discussion
CIE560 said:
2seas said:
If you go to google and type in "define: spam" (without the quotation marks obviously), you will see the following:
"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
You?"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
I thought the same, for every Raja post there are 3-4 moaning on, they are just as guilty of spamming this thread just because he won't be bullied into submission
2seas did you not see the post from Gaz?
I'll just leave this below, PH is not a dictatorship
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
Voltaire
CIE560 said:
2seas said:
If you go to google and type in "define: spam" (without the quotation marks obviously), you will see the following:
"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
You?"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
anonymous said:
[redacted]
No I didn't see the post from Gaz - who's he? I can't be arsed to look through and find it either.I have never called for Raja to get banned and I never will. I also don't believe in bullying people into agreeing with me - that's not my intention.
My issue is that he literally posts the same diatribe ad infinitum. Posting the same thing again and again and again is akin to Spam. Lots of people come on here on the wind up and while a little childish i'm willing to accept it because at least they're offering something new/different to read. It's easy to say just look past it and i've tried that - but if you're a regular you end up spending more time 'skimming on' then you do engaging in good football debate.
2seas said:
No I didn't see the post from Gaz - who's he? I can't be arsed to look through and find it either.
I have never called for Raja to get banned and I never will. I also don't believe in bullying people into agreeing with me - that's not my intention.
My issue is that he literally posts the same diatribe ad infinitum. Posting the same thing again and again and again is akin to Spam. Lots of people come on here on the wind up and while a little childish i'm willing to accept it because at least they're offering something new/different to read. It's easy to say just look past it and i've tried that - but if you're a regular you end up spending more time 'skimming on' then you do engaging in good football debate.
This is the post from Gaz, who is a site moderator, personally you are welcome to crack on as it makes no odds to me but thought you should be aware of all the infoI have never called for Raja to get banned and I never will. I also don't believe in bullying people into agreeing with me - that's not my intention.
My issue is that he literally posts the same diatribe ad infinitum. Posting the same thing again and again and again is akin to Spam. Lots of people come on here on the wind up and while a little childish i'm willing to accept it because at least they're offering something new/different to read. It's easy to say just look past it and i've tried that - but if you're a regular you end up spending more time 'skimming on' then you do engaging in good football debate.
Gaz. said:
I simply do not see the issue. If you think he's posting rubbish then use that little scrolley thing on your mouse and move to the next post.
The last time some of you threw your toys out of the pram it turned out half a dozen of you were calling him a
or that your ometer had gone off the scale, while Raja had barely used strong laguage. So he doesn't think much of Dalglish, so what?
If you don't like his posts and he hasn't broken any rules then ignore him or I'll lock this infantile thread becuase we are absolutely bloody sick to death of baby sitting it.
The last time some of you threw your toys out of the pram it turned out half a dozen of you were calling him a
or that your ometer had gone off the scale, while Raja had barely used strong laguage. So he doesn't think much of Dalglish, so what?If you don't like his posts and he hasn't broken any rules then ignore him or I'll lock this infantile thread becuase we are absolutely bloody sick to death of baby sitting it.
Uhura fighter said:
Then five or six from you and others to defend his right to type st and troll the board.
Because IMHO whilst I can see how it would get tiresome some of the personal attacks on Raja are beyond the pale, if people just ignored him people like me wouldnt feel the need to jump to his defencet and troll the board.There is of course the small matter that he has been pretty much spot on with all that he has said about the players and the performances and that he at least appears to go to the games, but thats not for me to get involved in
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I've told him which pub I drink in before a game, never seen him. He isn't someone I have ever seen at a reserve game either. Does it matter? what's your point? You live in London but support Manure, how many games do you get to see?Raja attacks others as much as he gets stick himself, he can handle himself, no problem there.
If you don't like the attacks, "just scroll down and ignore them"
Uhura fighter said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
I've told him which pub I drink in before a game, never seen him. He isn't someone I have ever seen at a reserve game either. Does it matter? what's your point? You live in London but support Manure, how many games do you get to see?Raja attacks others as much as he gets stick himself, he can handle himself, no problem there.
If you don't like the attacks, "just scroll down and ignore them"
It was more that this was chosen as a point with which to attack him then when that didnt work another tactic was used, he may not be peoples chosen mould of a Liverpool fan but he is a fan nonethelessFair point on scrolling down I will try and ignore the constant Raja bashing and hope that others do the same or the mods act if they dont
CIE560 said:
2seas said:
If you go to google and type in "define: spam" (without the quotation marks obviously), you will see the following:
"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
You?[/"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
Now I wonder who on this thread fits the description above...?
Come on 2seas. What's with the making it personal about freeing up seats for real fans nonsense. Next time you get to Anfield you might want to have a look around at the number of day trippers there who are more interested in having their picture taken rather than what's going on the pitch.
Of course some of our play looked better against West Brom but my opinion was based upon our season. From what I can see, regardless of how much you or others disagree and then attempt to make it personal, we were playing far more fluid and dynamic football at the end of last season than this.
Of course some of our play looked better against West Brom but my opinion was based upon our season. From what I can see, regardless of how much you or others disagree and then attempt to make it personal, we were playing far more fluid and dynamic football at the end of last season than this.
Raja said:
Come on 2seas. What's with the making it personal about freeing up seats for real fans nonsense. Next time you get to Anfield you might want to have a look around at the number of day trippers there who are more interested in having their picture taken rather than what's going on the pitch.
hmmm, this makes me feel a bit small.sorry.
Black can man said:
Top of the 'specific variety of miss' league! TheHeretic said:
Black can man said:
Top of the 'specific variety of miss' league! 
Would be more interesting if it was expressed as a percentage of total shots or as a percentage of shots on target. City are up in second place in that table, but I'd expect that to be a function of the number of shots they've had as much as anything else.
Before Christmas I'd have written it off as bad luck, but it's clearly something else. No idea what though.
Before Christmas I'd have written it off as bad luck, but it's clearly something else. No idea what though.
TheHeretic said:
Black can man said:
Top of the 'specific variety of miss' league! Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff