The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 2]
Discussion
Black can man said:
would imagine this article is pretty much spot on, not much of a surprise really , we all know who is picking the team over there
Why did RDM specifically go against what he was told to do by his boss ?
If my boss at work tells me to something i do it ?
Simple really
Ah but if you were already pretty wealthy and knew that even if you got sacked you would get a hefty pay off, would you still? Or would you try and wrestle back some control and damn the consequencesWhy did RDM specifically go against what he was told to do by his boss ?
If my boss at work tells me to something i do it ?
Simple really
im said:
Contradictory evidence of the 3 other officials...obviously.
Not like other abuse cases either....try going to the police with a claim you cant substantiate and see if they prosecute.
Evidence...its all that matters...chelsea's barristers should know that, why did they still insist that there was a case that needed hearing when they had none? Why didn't they say to Mikkel "sorry chap, but without proof we can't recommend taking this further"?
According to the radio earlier it was Ramires who stated Monkey was said. Mikel was not close enough to hear anythingNot like other abuse cases either....try going to the police with a claim you cant substantiate and see if they prosecute.
Evidence...its all that matters...chelsea's barristers should know that, why did they still insist that there was a case that needed hearing when they had none? Why didn't they say to Mikkel "sorry chap, but without proof we can't recommend taking this further"?
Edited by im on Thursday 22 November 18:00
There was also no video evidence to back up the claims
Frivolous
The funny thing is. Mikel will be charged for his behaviour after the game which includes threatening nehavious towards officials
Thing im wondering is what happens two months down the line when results under Rafa are no better, Torres still isn't scoring, the fans are even more up in arms over Rafa being manager and the squad are disillusioned with the way the season has/is panning out?
Of course those are just possibilities but be honest it could honestly happen. Tricky situation Roman has created.
Of course those are just possibilities but be honest it could honestly happen. Tricky situation Roman has created.
GLENRED said:
essexplumber said:
No, it's an opinion. I have an opinion on my shoulder, you wont be laughing when Suarez f
ks off to a moneybags rent-a-trophy club.
We bought him, if he wants to leave in a few seasons to go abroad then he can leave.ks off to a moneybags rent-a-trophy club.We will buy someone else with the money.
Strange "opinion" you have.
essexplumber said:
BlackST said:
Will Chelsea fans still hate Benitez with these wins and goals?
Godwins LawEP loses.
Of course they won't. They would welcome Hitler to the club if it brought in the shiny things.
968 said:
GLENRED said:
Didn’t I see an article where Levy has slapped a 60m price tag on Bale? 
Sorry 968, just saw your post about trolling, I'll leave it alone.
It wasn't aimed at you, as usual you (and the other scousers here) are responding to the continuous trolling from one set of supporters.Sorry 968, just saw your post about trolling, I'll leave it alone.
anniesdad said:
Black can man said:
I'm not Lampards biggest fan but i can't see him doing this to his adoring Chelsea fans in all fairness, he doesn't seem the type
RVP had a number of fans at Arsenal...football's a funny old game! He doesn't want to leave Chelsea the club are forcing his hand. ergo he can go where he wants and I think the fans would understand that
FWIW I wouldn#t be hugely keen. I would take him now as we could do with a midfielder right now and it would help the title push.
In the summer I would hope to see Cleverley push on in the second half of the season, Powell to get some time too and for us to buy someone for the future
So - Jan yes, Summer - no point
Black can man said:
Torres getting the nod over Ba ! wtf is going on at Chelsea ?
He's RA's bum boy I am sure. He must be played no excuses.Good piece in the mail from Nev about the manager situation
http://bit.ly/109Twff Abramovich has run out of managers to sack and options to replace Benitez ... #MailOnline
I think the sports editor at the mail may have actually jizzed when he saw it happening
Hazard Horror!!!
http://bit.ly/TnAGnQ Hazard horror: Chelsea's Eden shown a red card for kicking ball boy at Swansea ... #MailOnline
Hazard Horror!!!
http://bit.ly/TnAGnQ Hazard horror: Chelsea's Eden shown a red card for kicking ball boy at Swansea ... #MailOnline
The thing is for me the ball boy could be and probably is a bit of a cocky mouthy tt. Hazard may well have kicked the ball from under him.
But its so so easy for people to make it look and seem like something it isn't. It was a stupid act that people will now believe he did regardless of the facts and he'll be facing a lengthy ban
Silly boy. Funny as fk though, but silly boy nonetheless.
t. Hazard may well have kicked the ball from under him.But its so so easy for people to make it look and seem like something it isn't. It was a stupid act that people will now believe he did regardless of the facts and he'll be facing a lengthy ban
Silly boy. Funny as f
k though, but silly boy nonetheless.Chelsea forward Eden Hazard charged by The FA following incident in League Cup semi-final
The FA have charged Chelsea’s Eden Hazard following his side’s League Cup semi-final at Swansea City on 23 January 2013.
It is alleged that Hazard’s behaviour in relation to a Swansea City ball boy, for which the player was dismissed in the 78th minute, constituted violent conduct whereby the standard punishment that would otherwise apply was clearly insufficient.
The player has until 6pm on Tuesday 29 January 2013 to respond to the charge.
The FA will remind all clubs of their responsibilities in ensuring ball boys and other personnel around the pitch act in an appropriate manner at all times and will liaise with competitions accordingly.
The FA have charged Chelsea’s Eden Hazard following his side’s League Cup semi-final at Swansea City on 23 January 2013.
It is alleged that Hazard’s behaviour in relation to a Swansea City ball boy, for which the player was dismissed in the 78th minute, constituted violent conduct whereby the standard punishment that would otherwise apply was clearly insufficient.
The player has until 6pm on Tuesday 29 January 2013 to respond to the charge.
The FA will remind all clubs of their responsibilities in ensuring ball boys and other personnel around the pitch act in an appropriate manner at all times and will liaise with competitions accordingly.
Gassing Station | Football | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff