The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 2]

The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 2]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

ascayman

12,759 posts

217 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
on what basis can you possibly appeal??

GarryDK

5,670 posts

159 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
ascayman said:
on what basis can you possibly appeal??
I have no idea. THe tackle was really bad, red card for sure but his reaction was qalso a red card. We will not win this one unfortunately.

ascayman

12,759 posts

217 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
GarryDK said:
ascayman said:
on what basis can you possibly appeal??
I have no idea. THe tackle was really bad, red card for sure but his reaction was qalso a red card. We will not win this one unfortunately.
Yeah no doubt about the tackle it was awful and id fully expect Barnes to get done retrospectively, but appealing the red is ridiculous.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,402 posts

151 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
ascayman said:
Yeah no doubt about the tackle it was awful and id fully expect Barnes to get done retrospectively,
He can't be. Ref gave us a free kick, so he saw the foul. You can only take retrospective action for something the ref misses.

GarryDK

5,670 posts

159 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He can't be. Ref gave us a free kick, so he saw the foul. You can only take retrospective action for something the ref misses.
If thats the case he will get away with it.

ascayman

12,759 posts

217 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
ascayman said:
Yeah no doubt about the tackle it was awful and id fully expect Barnes to get done retrospectively,
He can't be. Ref gave us a free kick, so he saw the foul. You can only take retrospective action for something the ref misses.
That's a stupid rule if that's the case and should be looked at.

Does the rule still apply where you can potentially get an extra game for wasting everyone's time on pointless appeals?

ManFromDelmonte

2,742 posts

181 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He can't be. Ref gave us a free kick, so he saw the foul. You can only take retrospective action for something the ref misses.
But maybe he saw a foul but missed the ferocity or height of it? If he sees a slightly mis-timed tackle and gives a free-kick but misses the fact it was a knee-high two-footer? Surely you could argue retrospective action can and should be taken in this case?

GloverMart

11,831 posts

216 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
FA saying no action to be taken against Barnes.

968

11,965 posts

249 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all


GloverMart said:
FA saying no action to be taken against Barnes.
Yep and Hackett said it was an incompetent display of refereeing and Atkinson needs a rest.

TheAngryDog

12,409 posts

210 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
Yep and Hackett said it was an incompetent display of refereeing and Atkinson needs a rest.
I'm no Chelsea fan, but incompetent doesnt even reside in the same solar system! How any one could defend those challenges is beyond me and Barnes should be banned for the rest of the season.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,402 posts

151 months

Monday 23rd February 2015
quotequote all
ManFromDelmonte said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
He can't be. Ref gave us a free kick, so he saw the foul. You can only take retrospective action for something the ref misses.
But maybe he saw a foul but missed the ferocity or height of it? If he sees a slightly mis-timed tackle and gives a free-kick but misses the fact it was a knee-high two-footer? Surely you could argue retrospective action can and should be taken in this case?
It doesn't work that way. Retrospective action can only be taken when the officials miss the incident. It can't be taken if they see the incident but misjudge it.

tali1

5,266 posts

202 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Sean Dyche
“I find it hard to believe all these people who have now come out, especially the manager using very, very strong phrases about that moment, didn’t have any reaction at all at that live moment,” said Dyche, who reported that Matic was the only person among Chelsea’s players, staff and supporters to respond furiously.

“Please look at the reaction from a bunch of expert footballers on the Chelsea side – the likes of John Terry, a real warrior and a top-class professional in my opinion; Zouma; big, strong boys; Ivanovic – right on top of this moment. José Mourinho has a similar view to me. The crowd behind me, circa 15,000. No one reacts. Live time, no one reacts, apart from Matic. My point is the referee has a chance in live speed time, and no one reacts.

“In fact when you look at the footage, when the camera pans back to José Mourinho and his assistant, they are calmly talking about what they should do.

“After the event with hindsight, with camera views, with slo-mo, now it’s brought out statements like ‘criminal tackle’. I find that hard to adjust to when live at that moment 15,000-plus people behind me, [Chelsea’s] expert staff – they are all experts in their field, including a high-quality manager – and most of all the players on the football field [do not react].”

dxbtiger

4,390 posts

174 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
TheAngryDog said:
968 said:
Yep and Hackett said it was an incompetent display of refereeing and Atkinson needs a rest.
I'm no Chelsea fan, but incompetent doesnt even reside in the same solar system! How any one could defend those challenges is beyond me and Barnes should be banned for the rest of the season.
Have you even seen the Matic one?

It wasn't even a tackle, Matic has run into his follow through.

Cheib

23,274 posts

176 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
tali1 said:
Sean Dyche
“I find it hard to believe all these people who have now come out, especially the manager using very, very strong phrases about that moment, didn’t have any reaction at all at that live moment,” said Dyche, who reported that Matic was the only person among Chelsea’s players, staff and supporters to respond furiously.

“Please look at the reaction from a bunch of expert footballers on the Chelsea side – the likes of John Terry, a real warrior and a top-class professional in my opinion; Zouma; big, strong boys; Ivanovic – right on top of this moment. José Mourinho has a similar view to me. The crowd behind me, circa 15,000. No one reacts. Live time, no one reacts, apart from Matic. My point is the referee has a chance in live speed time, and no one reacts.

“In fact when you look at the footage, when the camera pans back to José Mourinho and his assistant, they are calmly talking about what they should do.

“After the event with hindsight, with camera views, with slo-mo, now it’s brought out statements like ‘criminal tackle’. I find that hard to adjust to when live at that moment 15,000-plus people behind me, [Chelsea’s] expert staff – they are all experts in their field, including a high-quality manager – and most of all the players on the football field [do not react].”
Sean Dyche comes across so well every time he's interviewed.....he is no fool. And in this case he's very right. Chelsea appealing a card for what was blatant retaliation was just ludicrous, as a podcast I listened to yesterday pointed out....Mourinho is very good at deflecting crtiticism after the team has a bad result. Nobody is talking about how the team drew at home to a relegation battling team...he's deflected attention from that fact brilliantly.

GloverMart

11,831 posts

216 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Agree with that.

What isn't quoted on here is Dyche's explanation of Barnes' tackle. He partially went into the bio-mechanics of the pendular motion of a players pass and how it would actually be quite difficult to stop your foot following through the path of the ball once you'd played it.

Interesting stuff and I hope Dyche continues being a successful manager who talks sense. He's a refreshing change to many managers.

ManFromDelmonte

2,742 posts

181 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Looks like Thorgen Hazard has been sold permanently to Borussia MGB but Chelsea retain a buy-back option.

I'm slightly disappointed as their were rumours he was even more promising than his brother.

Riff Raff

5,124 posts

196 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
dxbtiger said:
Have you even seen the Matic one?

It wasn't even a tackle, Matic has run into his follow through.
Should've gone to SpecSavers.




Cheib

23,274 posts

176 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Riff Raff said:
dxbtiger said:
Have you even seen the Matic one?

It wasn't even a tackle, Matic has run into his follow through.
Should've gone to SpecSavers.

Watch Sean Dyche's interview here and see for yourself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re5c-HPPvIE 4 mins in covers the Barnes/Matic incident.

The point he makes that nobody else on the pitch, in the crowd or even Mourinho and his team react to this horror tackle at all.

Watching it again it's pretty clear Barnes had kicked the ball, was following through and Matic was late. The tackler was Matic and he was late....Barnes was actually passing the ball.

trackdemon

12,193 posts

262 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Cheib said:
Riff Raff said:
dxbtiger said:
Have you even seen the Matic one?

It wasn't even a tackle, Matic has run into his follow through.
Should've gone to SpecSavers.

Watch Sean Dyche's interview here and see for yourself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re5c-HPPvIE 4 mins in covers the Barnes/Matic incident.

The point he makes that nobody else on the pitch, in the crowd or even Mourinho and his team react to this horror tackle at all.

Watching it again it's pretty clear Barnes had kicked the ball, was following through and Matic was late. The tackler was Matic and he was late....Barnes was actually passing the ball.
Hmmmm, which opinion to give more credence to? scratchchin

Yours (axe to grind), and the manager (hardly impartial) of the player in question? Or the vast majority of pundits & writers on the game - many of whom are ex players who certainly have no allegiance to Chelsea... Doesn't take a genius to work out which.

968

11,965 posts

249 months

Tuesday 24th February 2015
quotequote all
Cheib said:
Watch Sean Dyche's interview here and see for yourself

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Re5c-HPPvIE 4 mins in covers the Barnes/Matic incident.

The point he makes that nobody else on the pitch, in the crowd or even Mourinho and his team react to this horror tackle at all.

Watching it again it's pretty clear Barnes had kicked the ball, was following through and Matic was late. The tackler was Matic and he was late....Barnes was actually passing the ball.
Watched it again and again and how anyone can possibly consider that to be a good tackle is incredible. It's horrific.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED