The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 2]

The Official Chelsea Thread [Vol 2]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

TEKNOPUG

18,843 posts

204 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
Except we played better than you without a number 9 and created more chances and would've won but for an amazing save by Lloris.
Chelsea had one shot on target in the entire game.

You must subscribe to the Arsene Wenger school of post match analysis...

ascayman

12,732 posts

215 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
TEKNOPUG said:
Chelsea had one shot on target in the entire game.

You must subscribe to the Arsene Wenger school of post match analysis...
Spurs had more possession, more shots, more shots on target. Chelsea turned up with their normal brand of anti-football it was embarrassing.

968

11,945 posts

247 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
ascayman said:
Spurs had more possession, more shots, more shots on target. Chelsea turned up with their normal brand of anti-football it was embarrassing.
Good for you and yet you didn't win against a side with terribly poor confidence. Well done.

ascayman

12,732 posts

215 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
ascayman said:
Spurs had more possession, more shots, more shots on target. Chelsea turned up with their normal brand of anti-football it was embarrassing.
Good for you and yet you didn't win against a side with terribly poor confidence. Well done.
And you didn't even attempt to win against a team that was clearly knackered, odd for 'champions'.

Black can man

31,816 posts

167 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
Good for you and yet you didn't win against a side with terribly poor confidence. Well done.
Terribly poor on confidence ! oh do leave off


This Chelsea starting XI cost Chelsea £206.9M with not one homegrown player playing.


£206.9M & just one shot on target laugh Jose really is conning Abramovich, the club & the fans.


Still.. good to see you're happy with the point.

968

11,945 posts

247 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
ascayman said:
And you didn't even attempt to win against a team that was clearly knackered, odd for 'champions'.
Wow your bum hole is really stinging! Get it all off your chest.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,246 posts

149 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
silverfoxcc said:
And You actually pay to see that ste week after week. I applaud you
All the trophies make up for it.

ascayman

12,732 posts

215 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
968 said:
Wow your bum hole is really stinging! Get it all off your chest.
What on earth are you talking about?wobblelaugh

mickk

28,769 posts

241 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
silverfoxcc said:
And You actually pay to see that ste week after week. I applaud you
All the trophies make up for it.
But are you really happy?

hehe

smn159

12,443 posts

216 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
I thought that it was a pretty good game to be honest. Chelsea were well organised and looked dangerous on the counter attack, and came closest to scoring. Spurs had a lot of possession but not too many clear chances. Given recent results it’s hardly a surprise that Chelsea sat back more and played on the counter. The onus was on Spurs to break them down, which they largely failed to do.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,246 posts

149 months

Monday 30th November 2015
quotequote all
mickk said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
silverfoxcc said:
And You actually pay to see that ste week after week. I applaud you
All the trophies make up for it.
But are you really happy?

hehe
Lol.

No, when we fluked our way to Champions League triumph, it was the saddest day of my life.
rofl

m3sye

26,231 posts

200 months

Tuesday 1st December 2015
quotequote all
Fancy selling de Bruyne and lukaku and buying Eto and Salah ouch

Negative Creep

24,942 posts

226 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
Eto joined us for an undisclosed fee and scored a number of goals, including a hat trick against Man U. Not the best example really.

BrabusMog

20,083 posts

185 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
De Bruyne was a strange decision.

GarryDK

5,670 posts

157 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
BrabusMog said:
De Bruyne was a strange decision.
Not really, the guy at the time thought he was better than Hazard and Oscar etc, thought he deserved a place without proving it. Was asked to stay but preferred to do to a lower team for first team football. Granted after 18 months of regular football he is exceptional, but theres nothing to say he wouldnt of reached that level with us. City didnt even look at De Bruyne when we signed him for £8m or bat an eyelid when we sold him for £32m.

BrabusMog

20,083 posts

185 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
Wasn't he already playing in the Belgian national team regularly when you let him go? Fair enough if he was a bit too big for his boots, that's not good for the dressing room. But it seems like the guy just wanted to go and play football.

968

11,945 posts

247 months

Wednesday 2nd December 2015
quotequote all
BrabusMog said:
Wasn't he already playing in the Belgian national team regularly when you let him go? Fair enough if he was a bit too big for his boots, that's not good for the dressing room. But it seems like the guy just wanted to go and play football.
Yes and that's fine but when you've got a team with players like Hazard, Oscar and Willian you have to work hard and prove your value, not demand to be included and expect it to happen.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,246 posts

149 months

Saturday 5th December 2015
quotequote all
Pedro looking like a pub player today. Get him off and Costa on.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

204 months

Saturday 5th December 2015
quotequote all
Surely not.

mickk

28,769 posts

241 months

Saturday 5th December 2015
quotequote all
[pic] [/pic]
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED