The Official Tottenham Hotspur Thread [Vol 7]

[Black can man]

ascayman said:

Black can man said:

For this season Liverpool's net spend is £38,380,000 & the Tottenham one is -£1,250,000

That's a huge difference. Not to mention the huge wages you pay as well

Look at you with your facts

I just can't be had by these outsiders making numbers up to support their argument .

As you can tell i'm the kind of guy that only deals in facts .


Nice to see a bit of footie banter back on PH though & this really is the only thread where it can happen isn't it.

[ascayman]

Black can man said:

I just can't be had by these outsiders making numbers up to support their argument .

As you can tell i'm the kind of guy that only deals in facts .

Indeed, it'll be conveniently ignored by some though.

[London424]

m3sye said:

London424 said:

Not even close I'm afriad.

Net spend:
14/15 = - 1.25 mil
13/14 = - 9.8 mil
12/13 = - 1.3 mil
11/12 = - 27 mil

http://www.transferleague.co.uk/tottenham-hotspur/...

Frankly the fact Tottenham are still towards the top having not spent a bean in years is remarkable.

Sorry just went off this, first one that came up

https://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/blogs/pitchside-eur...

Fair enough...and as a supporter of another team I wouldn't expect you to know the ins and outs but the one obvious mistake is they've listed Davies coming in for 10 mil and Sigi going to Swansea as a Swap.

There are some others with that the sources differ by a million here and there, but that's the one that stands out.

[blindswelledrat]

ascayman said:

Black can man said:

For this season Liverpool's net spend is £38,380,000 & the Tottenham one is -£1,250,000

That's a huge difference. Not to mention the huge wages you pay as well

Look at you with your facts

[mickk]

Who started this same old argument about what club is considerably richer than the other one?

Let me guess.

[Black can man]

mickk said:

Who started this same old argument about what club is considerably richer than the other one?

Let me guess.

I guess he's holed up in Wales putting savlon on his sore bottom whilst lusting over the the local farmers ewe's

[TEKNOPUG]

London424 said:

Fair enough...and as a supporter of another team I wouldn't expect you to know the ins and outs but the one obvious mistake is they've listed Davies coming in for 10 mil and Sigi going to Swansea as a Swap.

There are some others with that the sources differ by a million here and there, but that's the one that stands out.

Kyle Naughton is missing from that list.

[ascayman]

mickk said:

Who started this same old argument about what club is considerably richer than the other one?

Let me guess.

Its incessant isn't it?

I noticed a post on the Liverpool thread the other day from a Liverpool fan

someonesaid said:

A football forum would be a nice place without HR

Its hard to disagree

[johnnywgk]

London424 said:

https://twitter.com/spursfunnies/status/5793284560...

lol

[mickk]

ascayman said:

I noticed a post on the Liverpool thread the other day from a Liverpool fan

someonesaid said:

A football forum would be a nice place without HR

Its hard to disagree

Harsh, he can't help it.

The medication needs to be increased.

[hornetrider]

mickk said:

Who started this same old argument about what club is considerably richer than the other one?

Let me guess.

Nobody. Blib raised money though, and cayman was the guy who started banging on about it. I couldn't give two sts.

Glad to be of assistance thicky.

[mickk]

hornetrider said:

I couldn't give two sts.

When I couldn't give two sts about something I tend not to comment.

I blame Blib though.

[Cheib]

TEKNOPUG said:

If the reported fee structure agreed with Madrid is true, then we'd only need to pay £10m or so to re-sign him. NEVER going to happen though, unless some Petro-Dollar Oligarch buys the club and thinks that £300k a week is loose change...

No. But the rest of the fee structure has already been committed to all those players you bought when Bale was signed so you'll still need the balance of those Bale payments!

[TEKNOPUG]

Cheib said:

No. But the rest of the fee structure has already been committed to all those players you bought when Bale was signed so you'll still need the balance of those Bale payments!

Easily covered by the new TV deal.

[dmulally]

TEKNOPUG said:

Easily covered by the new TV deal.

I heard on the Spurs Show podcast this morning that it is 10M per game. Is that fairdinkum?

[TEKNOPUG]

dmulally said:

TEKNOPUG said:

Easily covered by the new TV deal.

I heard on the Spurs Show podcast this morning that it is 10M per game. Is that fairdinkum?

That's how much the TV deal is paying per game, not what each club will receive. The domestic TV deal will pay anything between £80-100m to each club, each year.

[m3sye]

TEKNOPUG said:

That's how much the TV deal is paying per game, not what each club will receive. The domestic TV deal will pay anything between £80-100m to each club, each year.

Yep,. totally correct

And that figure is why fans need to stop getting so worked up about players earning 100k a week or 130k a week - these wages are going to keep on going up the more the premiership gets valuable. The players are the ones that make it sell-able so their agents are bound to want a big chunk of it.

[hornetrider]

TEKNOPUG said:

That's how much the TV deal is paying per game, not what each club will receive. The domestic TV deal will pay anything between £80-100m to each club, each year.

Gross or net?

[TEKNOPUG]

hornetrider said:

TEKNOPUG said:

That's how much the TV deal is paying per game, not what each club will receive. The domestic TV deal will pay anything between £80-100m to each club, each year.

Gross or net?

Would you even understand the difference if I told you?

[Cie]

hornetrider said:

TEKNOPUG said:

That's how much the TV deal is paying per game, not what each club will receive. The domestic TV deal will pay anything between £80-100m to each club, each year.

Gross or net?