The Official Manchester United Thread [Vol 5]

The Official Manchester United Thread [Vol 5]

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Black can man

31,841 posts

169 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Deal done for the kid £36M yikes

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Nom de ploom said:
does that mean DDG effectively can leave on a free at the end of this season? if so that's even worse than the debacle over contracts, irrespective of who's fault it was....

you have to feel for the player too...but any how lets see him back in the side, ipswich should be a useful warm up... hehe

Martial and Depay buying future potential and not really an investment at those prices...I'm bemoaning the lack of domestic talent going in to the top flight yet again during this window....

who has been the marquee domestic player moving clubs??
I'm going with Raheem quite comfortably based on the first 4 games. Only likely to get better as well.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Black can man said:
Deal done for the kid £36M yikes
Still cheaper than Raheeem smile

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
And potentially more expensive.

bstb3

4,089 posts

159 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
only £1m more than Pool paid for Andy Carroll too. Somehow doesn't seem quite so expensive now tongue out

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
And potentially more expensive.
I posted the breakdown above, safe to say if we have to pay them I don't think anyone will mind

MiniMan64

16,937 posts

191 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
If he comes good and scores a bundle then no one will quibble that price at only 19.

Can't really comment on the deal until we see how he gets on.

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
He could be a flop and you'll still have to pay a minimum of €50m.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Which is 36m and so still cheaper than Sterling as I said?

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Yes, but by comparing to Raheem you infer you believe he will be just as good - my point is that he could become the next Shaun Wright Phillips for £36m! I think most people will agree that Sterling represents as good/bad if not better "value for money" as Martial.

GTO-3R

7,490 posts

214 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
Yes, but by comparing to Raheem you infer you believe he will be just as good - my point is that he could become the next Shaun Wright Phillips for £36m! I think most people will agree that Sterling represents as good/bad if not better "value for money" as Martial.
Maybe that's because you've only seen Sterling play so know his qualities. How often you seen Martial play to judge whether he's good value or not?

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
Yes, but by comparing to Raheem you infer you believe he will be just as good - my point is that he could become the next Shaun Wright Phillips for £36m! I think most people will agree that Sterling represents as good/bad if not better "value for money" as Martial.
Weren't some scouse fans saying exactly that about Raheem when he signed for City?

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
GTO-3R said:
Maybe that's because you've only seen Sterling play so know his qualities. How often you seen Martial play to judge whether he's good value or not?
No one has seen Martial play, at least at the highest levels, often. He's only had 52 league appearances in his whole career. He makes Sterling look positively veteran!

57Ford

4,053 posts

135 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
I think most people will agree that Sterling represents as good/bad if not better "value for money" as Martial.
I must have read that 10 times but it still won't make sense to me and it's just making my head hurt smile
I think you're trying to say most people you've polled think Sterling offers more chance of value for money than Martial. I'd be surprised really if many of those people had even heard of the young Frenchman let alone seen him play.
It's definitely a gamble, I'm with you there (I think!) but due to folk not wanting to sell, I fail to see what else there was.
I've got to say, you must be one of those rare enlightened LFC fans if you place any value in Sterling's capabilities though because all I've heard all summer was how last season he never put a decent cross in, wouldn't track back and was too lightweight so the mighty LFC were well rid.

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Personally I didn't have any of those criticisms of Sterling. I wasn't too bothered when he left mainly because he'd shown himself to be far less than professional, was pretty useless for us last season and Ibe had shown more potential than Sterling at the same age. Granted Sterling has now had a great start at City.

I think a lot of people are surprised you've paid so much for Martial. I think Monaco knew you were desperate, hence the much higher price for you than the one they gave Spurs. You could have had Berahino for £25m. Essentially it's a massive gamble on the potential this dude turns into the next Henry, when the odds are relatively small and the risk is relatively large.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
No one has seen Martial play, at least at the highest levels, often. He's only had 52 league appearances in his whole career. He makes Sterling look positively veteran!
And in those 52 he has 11 goals, compared to Raheems 18 in 90 odd?

They're similar age and have both been called up for their respective international teams.

Of course it's a risk, any player that age is but I think the comparison is valid except Martial was 13m less.

E63M6

595 posts

121 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Eager to see him play his first match for us. Damn the international break... biggrin


m3sye

26,231 posts

202 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
i dont think it would really be that much of an issue if you had bought him and say Berahino, think the issue might be for you guys is you are buying a teenager for such a large some of money, bringing him into a new league and pretty much need him to hit the ground running..even more so if Rooney picks up an injury,
HUGE amount of pressure on the lad..

Be interesting to see him...For that money Lacazette would have surely been a more sensible option - the owner of Lyon has already said 50m euro and he can go too

Alpinestars

13,954 posts

245 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
Utd just released a statement re the DDG debacle putting our side of the story forward.

If true, Real look like they fked up and made their first bid at lunchtime yesterday.

The club is delighted that DDG remains a Utd player.

anonymous-user

55 months

Tuesday 1st September 2015
quotequote all
m3sye said:
i dont think it would really be that much of an issue if you had bought him and say Berahino, think the issue might be for you guys is you are buying a teenager for such a large some of money, bringing him into a new league and pretty much need him to hit the ground running..even more so if Rooney picks up an injury,
HUGE amount of pressure on the lad..

Be interesting to see him...For that money Lacazette would have surely been a more sensible option - the owner of Lyon has already said 50m euro and he can go too
Has the owner told Lacazzette that?

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11806/99410...
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED