Billions of habital planets in Milky Way

Billions of habital planets in Milky Way

Author
Discussion

Simpo Two

85,404 posts

265 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Next one in the sequence:

11 - 8 - 16 - 7 - ?
You could make a case for 21 though.


Derek Smith said:
Som out of the teams only one got both and only one other got one. I was not popular, but that's normal.
Well that's the idea of a knockout - if they all get every question there is no winner nuts

You'd have to be a photographer to get the aperture one but that's the whole point of general knowledge. It might have been about gardening, or cheese.

MartG

20,674 posts

204 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Planetary distance from the Sun in AU ?

Derek Smith

Original Poster:

45,655 posts

248 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Liked the AU question. I'll nick that one.

Other ones that caused problems.

First English captain to tour Australia? Clue: from Yorkshire.

What was Instanbul originally called?

MartG

20,674 posts

204 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Captain Cook, and Constantinople ( and no, I didn't use Google )

Eric Mc

122,007 posts

265 months

Sunday 22nd April 2012
quotequote all
Instantbul?

Sounds like a good description of anything spoken by Ed Balls.

Simpo Two

85,404 posts

265 months

Monday 23rd April 2012
quotequote all
MartG said:
Captain Cook
hehe

AshVX220

5,929 posts

190 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
I have a question relating to the previous pages questions (and appreciating this is way off topic).

What's the difference between Geo-stationary and geo-synchronous?

As I understand it, Geo-Stationary means the satellite remains fixed above a specific point on Earth, does geo-Synchronous means it orbits at the same rate the Earth spins? If so, then surely, by default, it'll stay above the same point on Earth and there be Geo-Stationary or does it mean the lat stays the same, but the Longitude "wobbles"?

Eric Mc

122,007 posts

265 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
I've always though that they mean the same thing.

Eric Mc

122,007 posts

265 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Aha - there IS a difference.

AshVX220

5,929 posts

190 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
Good explanation here.

It's interesting their definition of geosynchronous specifies a low inclination orbit, I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
Thank you, so my guess was right (except I got my Lat/Long mixed up).

wormburner

31,608 posts

253 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
AshVX220 said:
Thank you, so my guess was right (except I got my Lat/Long mixed up).
Latitude flatitude!

Eric Mc

122,007 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Longitude, wrongitude.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
The Russians use a fun orbit for some comms stuff.

MartG

20,674 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
A polar synchronous orbit wouldn't stay in one spot in the sky, but would pass over the same lines of longitude each orbit ( if it didn't hit any of the equatorial synchronous orbit satellites as it crossed their path twice each orbit ).

Spy satellites in polar orbit tend to be in a sun synchronous orbit, so they pass over at the same time every day - as it removes the possibility of different lighting conditions as the sun will always be in the same place, it makes it easier to spot anything that has chaged on the ground

wormburner

31,608 posts

253 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
How are collisions prevented? Or do they just work on the principle of them being hugely unlikely?