Billions of habital planets in Milky Way
Discussion
Derek Smith said:
Next one in the sequence:
11 - 8 - 16 - 7 - ?
You could make a case for 21 though.11 - 8 - 16 - 7 - ?
Derek Smith said:
Som out of the teams only one got both and only one other got one. I was not popular, but that's normal.
Well that's the idea of a knockout - if they all get every question there is no winner You'd have to be a photographer to get the aperture one but that's the whole point of general knowledge. It might have been about gardening, or cheese.
I have a question relating to the previous pages questions (and appreciating this is way off topic).
What's the difference between Geo-stationary and geo-synchronous?
As I understand it, Geo-Stationary means the satellite remains fixed above a specific point on Earth, does geo-Synchronous means it orbits at the same rate the Earth spins? If so, then surely, by default, it'll stay above the same point on Earth and there be Geo-Stationary or does it mean the lat stays the same, but the Longitude "wobbles"?
What's the difference between Geo-stationary and geo-synchronous?
As I understand it, Geo-Stationary means the satellite remains fixed above a specific point on Earth, does geo-Synchronous means it orbits at the same rate the Earth spins? If so, then surely, by default, it'll stay above the same point on Earth and there be Geo-Stationary or does it mean the lat stays the same, but the Longitude "wobbles"?
Bedazzled said:
Good explanation here.
It's interesting their definition of geosynchronous specifies a low inclination orbit, I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
Thank you, so my guess was right (except I got my Lat/Long mixed up).It's interesting their definition of geosynchronous specifies a low inclination orbit, I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
Bedazzled said:
I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
A polar synchronous orbit wouldn't stay in one spot in the sky, but would pass over the same lines of longitude each orbit ( if it didn't hit any of the equatorial synchronous orbit satellites as it crossed their path twice each orbit ).Spy satellites in polar orbit tend to be in a sun synchronous orbit, so they pass over at the same time every day - as it removes the possibility of different lighting conditions as the sun will always be in the same place, it makes it easier to spot anything that has chaged on the ground
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff