Login | Register
SearchMy Stuff
My ProfileMy PreferencesMy Mates RSS Feed
1 2 3 4
6
Reply to Topic
Author Discussion

Derek Smith

Original Poster:

16,225 posts

118 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
MartG said:
BarnatosGhost said:
So if the moon were to be geosynchronous, it too would have to orbit at 37,000 (or whatever the figure was) km?
Yes - well its centre of gravity would be at that distance, but the surface would be nearer.
A nice distinction.

I had to create some science questions for a quiz night (as well as some general knowledge ones). They had to vary in difficulty for a sort of knock-out towards the end, which the teams were aware of. For near the end I came up with: does the Moon orbit the Earth or the Earth orbit the Moon. The answer was, of course, neither, their common centre of gravity having a lot to do with it. I thought it clever but one bloke, who thought he was cleverer, said that the answer was that the Moon orbited the Earth as the CSG was below the surface of the Moon so by any sensible definition the Moon orbited the Earth.

Just 'cause someone's got a Phd they think they know it all.

Here was another two for a Sunday morning hangover cure. This was in general knowledge and not in the maths bit.

Next one in the sequence:

11 - 8 - 16 - 7 - ?

and

32 - 22 - 16 - 11 - 8 - ?


Bedazzled

4,308 posts

91 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all

The first is 11, 8, 16, 7, 19, 3, 17, 2, etc... "one hundred and eighty!!!"

And I think the second one is 32, 22, 16, 11, 8, 5.6, 4... camera apertures

Derek Smith

Original Poster:

16,225 posts

118 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Bedazzled said:

The first is 11, 8, 16, 7, 19, 3, 17, 2, etc... "one hundred and eighty!!!"

And I think the second one is 32, 22, 16, 11, 8, 5.6, 4... camera apertures
Well done.

The first one I thought would be easy as there was a dartboard right behind me and the second I thought would give two teams an advantage because they were all from a camera club. When I said 5.6 I was told that I was wrong. Som out of the teams only one got both and only one other got one. I was not popular, but that's normal.

Simpo Two

54,618 posts

135 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Derek Smith said:
Next one in the sequence:

11 - 8 - 16 - 7 - ?
You could make a case for 21 though.


Derek Smith said:
Som out of the teams only one got both and only one other got one. I was not popular, but that's normal.
Well that's the idea of a knockout - if they all get every question there is no winner nuts

You'd have to be a photographer to get the aperture one but that's the whole point of general knowledge. It might have been about gardening, or cheese.

Bedazzled

4,308 posts

91 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Here's another... what's the final number in the sequence?

0.39 - 0.72 - 1.00 - 1.52 - 5.20 - 9.58 - 19.23 - ???

a clue... we're back on topic!
Advertisement

MartG

2,795 posts

74 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Planetary distance from the Sun in AU ?

Derek Smith

Original Poster:

16,225 posts

118 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Liked the AU question. I'll nick that one.

Other ones that caused problems.

First English captain to tour Australia? Clue: from Yorkshire.

What was Instanbul originally called?

MartG

2,795 posts

74 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Captain Cook, and Constantinople ( and no, I didn't use Google )

Eric Mc

67,846 posts

135 months

[news] 
Sunday 22nd April 2012 quote quote all
Instantbul?

Sounds like a good description of anything spoken by Ed Balls.

Simpo Two

54,618 posts

135 months

[news] 
Monday 23rd April 2012 quote quote all
MartG said:
Captain Cook
hehe

AshVX220

1,817 posts

60 months

[news] 
Wednesday 25th April 2012 quote quote all
I have a question relating to the previous pages questions (and appreciating this is way off topic).

What's the difference between Geo-stationary and geo-synchronous?

As I understand it, Geo-Stationary means the satellite remains fixed above a specific point on Earth, does geo-Synchronous means it orbits at the same rate the Earth spins? If so, then surely, by default, it'll stay above the same point on Earth and there be Geo-Stationary or does it mean the lat stays the same, but the Longitude "wobbles"?

Eric Mc

67,846 posts

135 months

[news] 
Wednesday 25th April 2012 quote quote all
I've always though that they mean the same thing.

Bedazzled

4,308 posts

91 months

[news] 
Wednesday 25th April 2012 quote quote all
Good explanation here.

It's interesting their definition of geosynchronous specifies a low inclination orbit, I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.

Eric Mc

67,846 posts

135 months

[news] 
Wednesday 25th April 2012 quote quote all
Aha - there IS a difference.

AshVX220

1,817 posts

60 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
Bedazzled said:
Good explanation here.

It's interesting their definition of geosynchronous specifies a low inclination orbit, I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
Thank you, so my guess was right (except I got my Lat/Long mixed up).

wormburner

6,427 posts

123 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
AshVX220 said:
Thank you, so my guess was right (except I got my Lat/Long mixed up).
Latitude flatitude!

Eric Mc

67,846 posts

135 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
Longitude, wrongitude.

jmorgan

17,266 posts

154 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
The Russians use a fun orbit for some comms stuff.

MartG

2,795 posts

74 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
Bedazzled said:
I think in theory you could also have a polar geosynchronous orbit at 90 degrees, but I guess it wouldn't be very useful to spy satellites.
A polar synchronous orbit wouldn't stay in one spot in the sky, but would pass over the same lines of longitude each orbit ( if it didn't hit any of the equatorial synchronous orbit satellites as it crossed their path twice each orbit ).

Spy satellites in polar orbit tend to be in a sun synchronous orbit, so they pass over at the same time every day - as it removes the possibility of different lighting conditions as the sun will always be in the same place, it makes it easier to spot anything that has chaged on the ground

wormburner

6,427 posts

123 months

[news] 
Thursday 26th April 2012 quote quote all
How are collisions prevented? Or do they just work on the principle of them being hugely unlikely?
1 2 3 4
6
Reply to Topic