Mining Asteroids

Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,992 posts

265 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
It's great that we have REAL entrepeneurs willing to invest in a business that may not make a return within their own lifetime.
Making an investment in humanity is much more important than looking for a 5 year ROI in The City.

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
If grinding up a one-ton chunk of regolith generates less than an ounce of platinum, the economics of mining above the Earth's gravity well look decidedly rocky. Cool idea though, let's do it anyway. smile
Depends which asteroid you decide to mine - a lot are just lumps of rock, but others have been found ( using spectroscopy ) to be almost pure nickel-iron

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
slap a big enough induction coil round it and you can melt it down and process it without needing to dig anything biggrin

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
slap a big enough induction coil round it and you can melt it down and process it without needing to dig anything biggrin
Or use a big parabolic mirror to melt it with solar power

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
MartG said:
SystemParanoia said:
slap a big enough induction coil round it and you can melt it down and process it without needing to dig anything biggrin
Or use a big parabolic mirror to melt it with solar power
only problem with that is using direct solar activity to melt them would be that you would cause it the thrust away from you unpredictably where the sunlight scorches its surface.

with the coils you can hold it in place with solar/nuclear powered super conducting electro magnets while you proceed to melt the crap out of it.

also you can zip it into a ( giant ) tent before s/melting and capture all of the escaped gases for separate processing... more profit biggrin

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th April 2012
quotequote all
SystemParanoia said:
also you can zip it into a ( giant ) tent before s/melting and capture all of the escaped gases for separate processing... more profit biggrin
If you're going to do that, you could make the enclosure a rigid cylinder, with a refractory lining, and spin it so once melted the asteroid material could be separated by centrifugal force according to density, and tapped off at the rim.

( not my idea - read it in a novel by physicist Charles Sheffield )

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
sounds good...
could combine the 2 ideas, using the ( fire/inferno-proof ) tent idea to construct the solid metalwork one.


wouldn't want it in orbit though ( way too much mass to babysit! ).. Lagrange point 4 or 5 should be a good location for it.. may even be some trojan 'roids there to get started with biggrin

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,992 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
I keep thinking of Blake's 7. Wasn't Blake being transported to an asteroid mine when he made his escape?

qube_TA

8,402 posts

245 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Daft question, how would they know which asteroids to mine? There's one or two out there, they can't all be winners.


Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,992 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
qube_TA said:
Daft question, how would they know which asteroids to mine? There's one or two out there, they can't all be winners.
There are huindreds of thousands out there, and at least 10,000 that are classified as "near earth".

Analysis of the chemical composition of their surfaces can be done remotely - either from earth or from space based devices such as earthe orbiting satellites or asteroid probes. Some of this has already been done.

maffski

1,868 posts

159 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
qube_TA said:
Daft question, how would they know which asteroids to mine? There's one or two out there, they can't all be winners.
There are huindreds of thousands out there, and at least 10,000 that are classified as "near earth".

Analysis of the chemical composition of their surfaces can be done remotely - either from earth or from space based devices such as earthe orbiting satellites or asteroid probes. Some of this has already been done.
And this is really what they've anounced they're doing. They plan to launch some telescopes to map the composition of various asteroids. Presumeably they can then lay a 'claim' against the ones they think are worth while and figure out how to mine them later.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,992 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Laying "claims" may be legally difficult due to current space law. But until we have a "Space Patrol" I don't see what anyone can do about claims on and exploitation of planetary bodies.

If there ever is a Space Patrol, I want to join up smile

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
get in line!

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
As Eric says, I think current space law precludes any country from claiming an astronomical body in its entirety - not sure if there are any provisions for commercial exploitation though

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,992 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Could be a handy little earner for the United Nations - allocating mining rights to planets, moons and asteroids.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
I heard yesterday that the current cost of a kilo of water in low earth orbit is $100,000. The idea behind this is mainly that once an icy asteroid has been mined and the water turned into hydrogen and oxygen, it makes it orders of magnitude cheaper to explore the solar system since you have a ready source of fuel in orbit.

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
lots of ice in orbit around Saturn biggrin

Use Psychology

11,327 posts

192 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Bedazzled said:
If grinding up a one-ton chunk of regolith generates less than an ounce of platinum, the economics of mining above the Earth's gravity well look decidedly rocky. Cool idea though, let's do it anyway. smile
you don't get much more from 1 tonne of earth rock though, right?

Huff

3,150 posts

191 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Yes but without the massive gravitational potential well in the way.

One thing that I would like to live far, far longer than 1 standard mean human lifetime for is getting to see and do this stuff. I can imagine it, but the reality of stepping-off this Rock at will to go play ... millennia away, if ever frown

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th April 2012
quotequote all
Huff said:
One thing that I would like to live far, far longer than 1 standard mean human lifetime
Well some medical folk think that living in low gravity ( as opposed to zero G ) could have the effect of extending human life for various reasons, such as the reduced load on the heart, less stress on bones and joints, etc.

Anyone else want to retire to the moon ?