'Curiosity' - NASA Mars Rover - Due to land 5th Aug 2012

'Curiosity' - NASA Mars Rover - Due to land 5th Aug 2012

Author
Discussion

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Just under 7mins to touchdown per the simulation. Does that mean it's either down or dead by now - but we'll know in 7mins?

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Goosebumps now! biggrin

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Chute has deployed!!!!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Powered flight!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
Here we go!
+10000
Skycrane on!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
OMFG WE'VE DONE IT!!!!!!!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Just received a thumbnail image - A PHOTO OF THE WHEEL ON THE SURFACE!!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Image 1 thumb:

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Image 1 higher res and image 2:

UNREAL!!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Do we know if they managed to film the descent and landing?

If so, when will those images (video) be available?
I think they did, and they will be available later this week.

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
They just said that driving to the crater is like going on a family trip from mission control to chigago... except that your family in the car is really 400 scientists who want to stop to look at every rock and bump along the way!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for agreeing to leave politics out of this science thread. smile

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
FurtiveFreddy said:
The other pic which could be really spectacular is the one taken by the Mars Orbiter's HiRise camera. This was pointed in the direction of the MSL during descent, but there's no guarantee it managed to get the MSL in the picture. The pictures from HiRise are very high resolution, so it will take many hours to receive the data back which means we probably won't know until later today or tomorrow if it's been successful.
According to this: http://www.planetary.org/blogs/emily-lakdawalla/20...
The image WAS captured successfully, but they're sitting on it until the press briefing at 4pm this afternoon. Should be amazing!

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
jacobpalmer05 said:
I haven't been following this from the start, however can someone explain the point of it all?
To learn.

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Amazing as Cuiriosity is going to be - don't forget it is going to take six months to cover the ground an Apollo era Lunar Rover could cover in a few hours.
The lunar rover and the Curiosity have different objectives in the "driving" dept. The lunar rover HAD to be fast, since it carried a perishable cargo. The Curiosity doens't have that problem. Curiosity's main problem would be falling over or getting stuck, so a gently/softly/slowly/carefully operation suits its objectives and risks better.

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Tune in at 5pm UK for the next press conference, hopefully with the descent photos.
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
garyhun said:
Einion Yrth said:
Excellent!!!!! A dream start to a mission.
Wowzers.

Update on nasa tv about to start here:
http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/nasatv/index.html

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Not read thread since 5pm as I've been watching over 90mins of press conference. Here's some stuff:

Entry
- The photo of the parachute was taken from MRO which was almost overhead, but 340km away 'line of sight'

Landing
- The crane flew off in one of two directions, to avoid pluming the rover. They chose the most northbound of those two options.
- The rover touched down with 0.75m/s vertical velocity and 4cm/s horizontal.

Photos
- They saw the 'blotch' but they don't know if it's the crane crash landing yet
- Expect the front hires photos in an hour or so.
- Mardi BW cameras in 1-2 days
- Mardi descent video thumbs in 2hrs (press conf at 4pm pacific time will reveal if they have them)
- Recieved so far (4x thumbs, 2 cover on, 1 cover off)
- MRO landing site photos late this week.


Next
- The crane has 140kg of hydrazine fuel onboard, so they won't go and investigate the crash site - infact they want to stay away! If science took them close, then they'll take photos though.
- High gain antenna, to talk direct to earth, in 12hrs.
- Ground looks hard, so will take first scoop sample elsewhere
- MRO photos will assist with nav when driving. No sat nav of course, so have to use boulders etc as way points.
- 1 or 2 weeks to first drive, and will only be 1-2meters.
- Team will live on mars time for 90 days, for best efficiency checking out the vehicle (corresponding to data link availability), and also helps bond the international team (400 scientists and 300 engineers)

PS - Everthing looks nominal. smile

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Sorry?
Stationary.

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

205 months

Monday 6th August 2012
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Reading on the press kit where they have tried to minimise the contamination. That a bit what goes around comes around......... wink
What do you mean by that?