Adult cells cloned

Author
Discussion

Terminator X

Original Poster:

15,052 posts

204 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/health-scienc...

Not sure I like the idea of it despite potential medical benifits, what do you think?

TX.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
I hear what you're saying BUT the medical implications are enormous.

Simpo Two

85,388 posts

265 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
Whenever something really exciting comes along, wheezy old gits appear (usually church and politicians and eco-types) and start wittering on about ethics. Church people don't like science because it undermines their faith, politicians don't like it because they think it will lose votes, and eco-types because they didn't study it at school.

And so whilst one half of mankind can do something amazing, the other half kicks him in the nuts.

Ledaig

1,695 posts

262 months

Tuesday 22nd April 2014
quotequote all
It does make you wonder ho close we are to 'The Island'

But screw that - lets crack on and I'll have a new lens and cornea please biggrin


This is here and this is now, it will only progress - it will not disappear. Better to have it in the open and available to use for the better, than hidden away and used for other purposes alone.

BevR

679 posts

143 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Terminator X said:
http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/health-scienc...

Not sure I like the idea of it despite potential medical benifits, what do you think?

TX.
What don't you like about it? I have no trouble with the ideas proposed here, I cant wait to reach a point where someone takes a few of my cells to build a new eye/heart/liver whatever you want. Still a generation or two away though, this is really very early building blocks.

Most important bit of the article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.03.015 said:
Thus, despite epigenetic and other age-related changes
that could hinder reprogramming, middle-aged and elderly adult
donors can be used to generate pluripotent stem cells using
nuclear transplantation

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
BevR said:
Terminator X said:
http://m.washingtonpost.com/national/health-scienc...

Not sure I like the idea of it despite potential medical benifits, what do you think?

TX.
What don't you like about it? I have no trouble with the ideas proposed here, I cant wait to reach a point where someone takes a few of my cells to build a new eye/heart/liver whatever you want. Still a generation or two away though, this is really very early building blocks.

Most important bit of the article:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2014.03.015 said:
Thus, despite epigenetic and other age-related changes
that could hinder reprogramming, middle-aged and elderly adult
donors can be used to generate pluripotent stem cells using
nuclear transplantation
If someone used my cells to grow me a new pair of eyes, would they still be shortsighted? I'd prefer someone else's if so.

BevR

679 posts

143 months

Thursday 24th April 2014
quotequote all
Dr Jekyll said:
If someone used my cells to grow me a new pair of eyes, would they still be shortsighted? I'd prefer someone else's if so.
Nope, not unless your shortsightedness is a genetic condition. The advantage is that you wont have to worry too much about rejection as the donor is for all intents and purposes- you.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Friday 25th April 2014
quotequote all
BevR said:
Dr Jekyll said:
If someone used my cells to grow me a new pair of eyes, would they still be shortsighted? I'd prefer someone else's if so.
Nope, not unless your shortsightedness is a genetic condition. The advantage is that you wont have to worry too much about rejection as the donor is for all intents and purposes- you.
"Boom"!