Quantum entanglement Dispelling the myth of FTL transmission

Quantum entanglement Dispelling the myth of FTL transmission

Author
Discussion

ExplorerII

Original Poster:

279 posts

134 months

Monday 28th July 2014
quotequote all
Makes sense at last. Very interesting.

http://observationdeck.io9.com/corpore-metals-delu...

RegMolehusband

3,960 posts

257 months

Monday 28th July 2014
quotequote all
I was saying this to Mrs. Molehusband only this evening!

Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Monday 28th July 2014
quotequote all
Suddenly the bible is seeming quite normal nuts

AA999

5,180 posts

217 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
Wish I could really get my head around the depths of quantum mechanics and its implications.

I still can't fully grasp the Pauli Exlusion Principal which Brian Cox mentioned on a BBC program a while ago.....in that no electron can exist with the same energy state as another, no matter how far apart they are.
With the example given that if one electron were to be at one side of the universe and another electron being at the other side of the universe, with all the distance and other trillions of particles between them that if one of those mentioned electrons were to change to an energy state to that of the other, it would either 'know' it can't or that the other electron would automatically change to accommodate the balance.

(I think that is how it was explained anyhow).


How the FLYING RAT TURDS could they [the electrons] 'know' from that distance what each other is 'doing' if 'information' can travel only at the speed of light?


Gandahar

9,600 posts

128 months

Tuesday 29th July 2014
quotequote all
"No Magic FTL Radios

So, knowing and accepting all that, here's why it can't be used for FTL communications."


Surely there will be a smartphone rather than a radio that can do it smile

Never ever say in science "you cannot do it" somewhere someone will prove it can, even if you have to be on an event horizon tuning your radio in to the Hot FM


ExplorerII

Original Poster:

279 posts

134 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
AA999 said:
Wish I could really get my head around the depths of quantum mechanics and its implications.

I still can't fully grasp the Pauli Exlusion Principal which Brian Cox mentioned on a BBC program a while ago.....in that no electron can exist with the same energy state as another, no matter how far apart they are.
With the example given that if one electron were to be at one side of the universe and another electron being at the other side of the universe, with all the distance and other trillions of particles between them that if one of those mentioned electrons were to change to an energy state to that of the other, it would either 'know' it can't or that the other electron would automatically change to accommodate the balance.

(I think that is how it was explained anyhow).


How the FLYING RAT TURDS could they [the electrons] 'know' from that distance what each other is 'doing' if 'information' can travel only at the speed of light?
The Pauli exclusion principle relates to fermions, which includes electrons, orbiting the same atom afaik.

Prawnboy

1,326 posts

147 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
OW, my brain.

Twobad

69 posts

174 months

Thursday 31st July 2014
quotequote all
ExplorerII said:
AA999 said:
Wish I could really get my head around the depths of quantum mechanics and its implications.

I still can't fully grasp the Pauli Exlusion Principal which Brian Cox mentioned on a BBC program a while ago.....in that no electron can exist with the same energy state as another, no matter how far apart they are.
With the example given that if one electron were to be at one side of the universe and another electron being at the other side of the universe, with all the distance and other trillions of particles between them that if one of those mentioned electrons were to change to an energy state to that of the other, it would either 'know' it can't or that the other electron would automatically change to accommodate the balance.

(I think that is how it was explained anyhow).


How the FLYING RAT TURDS could they [the electrons] 'know' from that distance what each other is 'doing' if 'information' can travel only at the speed of light?
The Pauli exclusion principle relates to fermions, which includes electrons, orbiting the same atom afaik.
That is my understanding too. The electrons have to be in the same quantum system, which is usually an atom. Without the Exclusion Principal all the electrons in an atom would fall into the base energy level and you'd have no electron shells or chemistry as we know it.

Entangled electrons are a system in their own right and so can interact over distances. However, once you investigate one of the pair they cease to be entangled and a quantum system and the Exclusion Principle no longer applies to them.


Edited by Twobad on Thursday 31st July 12:18