Rosetta Probe

Author
Discussion

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

212 months

Monday 5th September 2016
quotequote all
garyhun said:
jammy_basturd said:
garyhun said:
Eric Mc said:
Pretty amazing picture.
It certainly is. I feel sorry for Philae, stranded on a big rock hurtling through space.
One can empathise...
I guess I should have added 'alone' smile
One can empathise! cry

scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
Pesty said:


Really lucky to have eventually found it, the surface made for a proper needle-in-haystack possibility.

I love these pictures from Rosetta, it really is the most alien surface we've ever seen, its just a "clump" no erosion, no volcanism etc but still it has so much interesting and varied terrain.

Rosetta has done well but I feel like we have more questions now that before we sent it, we certainly didn't guess right when it came to landing on the surface, 2nd time lucky?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
Philae essentially didn't work properly when it first contacted the surface. The anchoring system failed to deploy. It was a problem with Philae rather than a problem with the comet.

peterperkins

3,151 posts

242 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
Philae's predicament now reminds me of the Film Dark Star where one of the crew happily rides a cluster of Asteroids for eternity round the universe.....

Quite a decent way to go really. Sat in the shade watching the solar system fly by. Quite fancy the trip myself.. Infinitely better than dribbling my last few years away in the corner of some diabolical care home...

If the orbit is perturbed at some unknown date in the future Philae via it's host could be the first man made object to reach the stars..

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
I would suggest the Voyagers, Pioneers 11 and 12 and New Horizons are ahead in that race.

Halmyre

11,190 posts

139 months

Tuesday 6th September 2016
quotequote all
peterperkins said:
Philae's predicament now reminds me of the Film Dark Star where one of the crew happily rides a cluster of Asteroids for eternity round the universe.....

Quite a decent way to go really. Sat in the shade watching the solar system fly by. Quite fancy the trip myself.. Infinitely better than dribbling my last few years away in the corner of some diabolical care home...

If the orbit is perturbed at some unknown date in the future Philae via it's host could be the first man made object to reach the stars..
But Philae (and the comet) will be back in just over 6 years, no doubt changed beyond all recognition after encountering an alien civilisation, and determined to erase humanity from existence.

MartG

20,673 posts

204 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all

durbster

10,262 posts

222 months

Tuesday 27th September 2016
quotequote all
I do wish they wouldn't refer to it as an "impact site", and let us pretend we think it's going to touch down gently and continue to send us amazing photos biggrin

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
http://livestream.com/ESA/rosettagrandfinale

Grand finale in 12h's

any chance of a countdown mods ?

MartG

20,673 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
"Rosetta Collision Burn start confirmed a few moments ago, monitoring the progress. AND end of Collision Burn confirmed at 22:51:39 CEST, duration around 208 seconds. Next stop Comet #67P!"

frown

MartG

20,673 posts

204 months

Thursday 29th September 2016
quotequote all
"Rosetta has completed its final manoeuvre and is now on a collision course with Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

The spacecraft will soon take a set of five images with its navigation cameras to confirm that the spacecraft is on target, and to refine the predicted impact time. The next report, with the updated time and at least one of those NAVCAM images, is expected around 0400 UT / 0600 CEST."

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
One of the technicians explained on Radio 4 this morning why they have to shut Rosetta down just before it touches down -

the mission has ended so it is one of the rules of robotic probe space exploration that the transmitters be shut down once there is no more data to transmit. This is because the band of frequencies used by probes is very narrow and they don't want to clog up the airwaves and compromise the effectiveness of future missions

the mission will end automatically once they touch down because it is highly likely that, once Rosetta settles on the surface, it will sit at an angle that will stop its high gain antenna from pointing at the earth - which means that it could not communicate with earth.
This is why they have to send a signal to shut it down before it lands otherwise they will lose contact and miss the opportunity to send the "shut down" signal.

p1stonhead

25,540 posts

167 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
ash73 said:
They should have had a second go at a landing imo, simple to calculate a tiny thrust just a metre or so above the surface to arrest the fall, the instruments could survive a little bounce. Well it's easy in Kerbal anyhow smile
No it isnt!

Im so terrible at that game frown

andy_s

19,400 posts

259 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
the mission will end automatically once they touch down because it is highly likely that, once Rosetta settles on the surface, it will sit at an angle that will stop its high gain antenna from pointing at the earth - which means that it could not communicate with earth.
This is why they have to send a signal to shut it down before it lands otherwise they will lose contact and miss the opportunity to send the "shut down" signal.
I read elsewhere that the antenna needed to be within half a degree of accuracy, so highly unlikely to work post-crash; also I think the sensors onboard are designed to shut down automatically on contact anyway. They are hoping for 20/15m altitude imagery, especially of some deep holes near the land sight to get a look 'inside', so I surmise shut down is very, very close to the surface if not on actual impact.


Halmyre

11,190 posts

139 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
I can just imagine the project management discussions.

Chairman: "OK, it's time to discuss the final stage of the mission."
1st Engineer: "Let's leave it in space for eternity as a tribute to mankind's ingenuity and quest for scientific knowledge."
2nd Engineer: "Let's crash it into the comet!"
All Other Engineers: "YAAY! Crash!"

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
ash73 said:
Makes good sense but they could easily program it to power down x days after touchdown, even without contact, rather than killing it on the way down.
They can't be sure that they maintain contact with the probe once it lands on the surface. The transmissions are spread over a very narrow beam angle so if the surface is not absolutely flat, the transmission dish will be resting at an angle and their is a high possibility that the beam will miss the earth - and transmissions from earth will not be able to reach the probe. The only cautious thing to do is to turn the craft off when they are 100% sure they can communicate with it. And that is what they have done.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Halmyre said:
I can just imagine the project management discussions.

Chairman: "OK, it's time to discuss the final stage of the mission."
1st Engineer: "Let's leave it in space for eternity as a tribute to mankind's ingenuity and quest for scientific knowledge."
2nd Engineer: "Let's crash it into the comet!"
All Other Engineers: "YAAY! Crash!"
It's a very slow speed "crash". The impact will be at about 3 mph.

durbster

10,262 posts

222 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,994 posts

265 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
Watching - thanks

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

198 months

Friday 30th September 2016
quotequote all
1000m altitude and falling...