Rosetta Probe

Author
Discussion

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Wednesday 15th October 2014
quotequote all
What is the ratio for its dimensions...... is it black.....

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Primary landing site


LordGrover

33,538 posts

212 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
What is the ratio for its dimensions...... is it black.....
Dave, I can see you're really upset about this.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
What is the ratio for its dimensions...... is it black.....
Hee hee.

That would be good.

scorp

8,783 posts

229 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
I wonder how loosely packed that 'dirt' is ?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
It looks quite powdery to me.

Before we started soft landing probes on the moon, there was genuine fear that the surface might be so loose and powdery that a probe or a Lunar Module might sink into a sea of dust. That proved unfounded. But I think there may be surfaces like that on bodies such as comets.

durbster

10,243 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Can't we assume that everything we can see is stuck firmly to the body of the comet?

How much mass does an object need in order to produce enough gravity to hold on to small rocks or dust?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
There will be a number of forces acting on the matter that makes up the object keeping it together. Gravity is the obvious one. There will also be molecular bonds and friction between the particles which will allow the particles to "stick" together.

However, the density may be quite low as the material may not be too compacted together - which could lead to a "merengue" type surface.

FunkyNige

8,881 posts

275 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
This popped up on their Twitter feed this morning



Quite nice to see the lander 'talking' to Rosetta like that, only so much real science you can put into 130 characters!

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Sounds like HAL talking to SAL.

durbster

10,243 posts

222 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Yeah I'm following them on Twitter and it's a great way of delivering the info. Mind you, I also hate it because it's humanised them, so I think I'll be genuinely sad if it goes wrong. hehe

And the fact that it's effectively a suicide mission just makes it worse.cry

jbudgie

8,906 posts

212 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Really looking forward to the 12th November, I hope we get some 'live ' updates of how things are going.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

198 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
There will be a number of forces acting on the matter that makes up the object keeping it together. Gravity is the obvious one. There will also be molecular bonds and friction between the particles which will allow the particles to "stick" together.

However, the density may be quite low as the material may not be too compacted together - which could lead to a "merengue" type surface.
Will be interesting to see. There obviously isn't much gravity, hence the lander screwing itself into the surface (well, always assuming the surface is solid enough for that to work).

FunkyNige

8,881 posts

275 months

Thursday 16th October 2014
quotequote all
durbster said:
And the fact that it's effectively a suicide mission just makes it worse.cry
Not always bad as it does give the controllers a bit more freedom, so when the LCROSS mission deliberately crashed into the moon a few years back these were its 'last tweets' (read bottom to top)


hehe
(from one of Douglas Adams' Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy books for those wondering)

NASA seem to be quite good at live streaming the big events of their missions, ie. the latest Mars lander, but I don't think ESA have ever had something quite like this before in the information age have they?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Watched the Sky at Night last night and they said they are covering the landing live on BBC starting at 9.00 pm on November 16.

Mojocvh

16,837 posts

262 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Watched the Sky at Night last night and they said they are covering the landing live on BBC starting at 9.00 pm on November 16.
That was quite an interesting episode..

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

121,941 posts

265 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Good preparation for my OU Moons course.

thatdude

2,655 posts

127 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Mojocvh said:
Eric Mc said:
Watched the Sky at Night last night and they said they are covering the landing live on BBC starting at 9.00 pm on November 16.
That was quite an interesting episode..
I enjoyed it too - I havnt taken the opportunity to look for Uranus or neptune but I'm dead excited to give it a go now on the next clear night biggrin

jbudgie

8,906 posts

212 months

Friday 17th October 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Watched the Sky at Night last night and they said they are covering the landing live on BBC starting at 9.00 pm on November 16.
have I got dates wrong --thought it was on the 12th ?

Pesty

42,655 posts

256 months

Saturday 18th October 2014
quotequote all
What an awesome mission.