Artillery projectiles - do they have a brass casing?

Artillery projectiles - do they have a brass casing?

Author
Discussion

Rick_1138

Original Poster:

3,675 posts

178 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
One for the tread heads here, or any ex army folks smile

Basically I am doing a modelling diorama for a national competition and I am trying to find suitable items for the layout.

Basically it is an artillery piece that is supposed to have been abandoned with shells left lying, a last stand affair.

It is a sci-fi setting so the tank isn't real world applicable so I am having to find suitable modelling bits and bobs to use.

My initial idea was to use scale brass shell casings =, however finding suitable bits is difficult.

The main thing I am trying to find out is if modern artillery uses a metal shell casing, like a bullet) or if they use a shell, then powder put in separately like a ships gun?

Just curious as I want it to look right.

Thanks for any advice smile

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Looks to be separate bags of propellant:
https://www.army.mod.uk/rolefinder/role/60/armoure...

Rick_1138

Original Poster:

3,675 posts

178 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Cheers that's pretty handy smile

Seems some large artillery used a brass casing, some used bagless for the same calibre.

Thinking I may go for brass as the used tubes add's a level of desperation of just chucking them out to get the next one in.

The idea is based on the tank chassis the Germans dug into the road in berlin as a last stand artillery defence.

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
As a side note, when I was in Bosnia I nicked a massive artillery shell casing from the NORBAT officers mess whilst the Artillery where having a big shindig. Unfortunately I was bubbled by the gate guard and forced under duress to return it the next day. The bds staged a kangaroo court and scared the crap out of me.

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Rick_1138 said:
Cheers that's pretty handy smile

Seems some large artillery used a brass casing, some used bagless for the same calibre.

Thinking I may go for brass as the used tubes add's a level of desperation of just chucking them out to get the next one in.

The idea is based on the tank chassis the Germans dug into the road in berlin as a last stand artillery defence.
Sci-fi needs a rail-gun. You need a gen-set, big cables linking the two, and a stockpile of shells that look like these.


Rick_1138

Original Poster:

3,675 posts

178 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
rhinochopig said:
Sci-fi needs a rail-gun. You need a gen-set, big cables linking the two, and a stockpile of shells that look like these.

You'd think so, but this is warhammer 40,000 infantry, think WW1 on a continental battle scale, i.e. far future but old school mahoosive artillery, hence self propelled artillery in the style of German Flak 88's but 150mm calibre.

Having a hunt about, the german SDKFZ 'Hummel' is a real world counterpart to what I am doing.

Google Armageddon pattern basilisk and you will see what I am making.

Foliage

3,861 posts

122 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Rick_1138 said:
You'd think so, but this is warhammer 40,000 infantry, think WW1 on a continental battle scale, i.e. far future but old school mahoosive artillery, hence self propelled artillery in the style of German Flak 88's but 150mm calibre.

Having a hunt about, the german SDKFZ 'Hummel' is a real world counterpart to what I am doing.

Google Armageddon pattern basilisk and you will see what I am making.
The Hummel's gun uses seperate loading ammunition so that the charge can be adjusted. I cant find any pictures unfortunately.

Might be worth you giving this -http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/bullets2.htm a read

Rick_1138

Original Poster:

3,675 posts

178 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Foliage said:
The Hummel's gun uses seperate loading ammunition so that the charge can be adjusted. I cant find any pictures unfortunately.

Might be worth you giving this -http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/munitions/bullets2.htm a read
Sorry I meant the Hummel is the counterpart in style\look of the thing. Gun wise its a scaled up version of the flak 88 gun.

I ended up finding 105mm artillery ammunition in 1.35th scale that should be close enough to look right.

Interesting reading about modern ammo and armour piercing tungsten spike ammo!

Ranger 6

7,052 posts

249 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Rick_1138 said:
..Seems some large artillery used a brass casing, some used bagless for the same calibre....
This is it - there's no exact science on this one. My father has a 3ft brass case (Chinese I think) he uses as an umbrella stand, yet our 155s had bag charges. The 105s had brass, etc, etc.

The biggest thing for me from a gun position was the packaging rather than the cases. Everything comes on pallets, the bag charges in tubes and so on.

HTH

rhinochopig

17,932 posts

198 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Rick_1138 said:
rhinochopig said:
Sci-fi needs a rail-gun. You need a gen-set, big cables linking the two, and a stockpile of shells that look like these.

You'd think so, but this is warhammer 40,000 infantry, think WW1 on a continental battle scale, i.e. far future but old school mahoosive artillery, hence self propelled artillery in the style of German Flak 88's but 150mm calibre.

Having a hunt about, the german SDKFZ 'Hummel' is a real world counterpart to what I am doing.

Google Armageddon pattern basilisk and you will see what I am making.
Well if you'd you'd said 40k from the start then it would have helped. Clearly there isn't standard template construct for a rail-gun wink

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
tuffer said:
NORBAT .
?????

Piersman2

6,598 posts

199 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
tuffer said:
NORBAT .
?????
Shortened version of Nora Batty for those of us in the know!

smile

tapkaJohnD

1,942 posts

204 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Shell cases, the brass bits that used to stay in the gun, and held the propellant - find a rifle club and ask for some spent .22 cases. Should be OK for about 1/5th scale of a modern 105mm tank gun.
See: http://www.generalequipment.info/TANK%20AMMO%20105...

John

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Piersman2 said:
Shortened version of Nora Batty for those of us in the know!

smile
She did have a brass neck, I suppose.

Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
tapkaJohnD said:
Shell cases, the brass bits that used to stay in the gun, and held the propellant - find a rifle club and ask for some spent .22 cases
That was my thought too. I got through a few in the school rifle range!

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Thursday 14th August 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
tuffer said:
NORBAT .
?????
Norwegian Battalion, actually consisted of Swedes, Norwegians, Danes and Finns. But it was a long time ago and I have drunk a lot of beer since then so I may have the name wrong.

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Friday 15th August 2014
quotequote all
Thank you.

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Friday 15th August 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Thank you.
In fact, Nordic Battalion.

RizzoTheRat

25,165 posts

192 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
tuffer said:
Looks to be separate bags of propellant:
I think in generally indirect fire (artillery) tend to use bagged charges, while direct fire (tanks) use cased rounds. The bagged charges allow you to fire on different trajectories, so it's possible with an AS90 to fire 3 rounds and have them all land on the target at the same time.

tuffer

8,849 posts

267 months

Thursday 21st August 2014
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
tuffer said:
Looks to be separate bags of propellant:
I think in generally indirect fire (artillery) tend to use bagged charges, while direct fire (tanks) use cased rounds. The bagged charges allow you to fire on different trajectories, so it's possible with an AS90 to fire 3 rounds and have them all land on the target at the same time.
Or just chuck one miles off target.... Chumps