We May Be Alone In The Milky Way After All (says Brian Cox)

We May Be Alone In The Milky Way After All (says Brian Cox)

Author
Discussion

jbudgie

8,906 posts

212 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
KareemK said:
jbudgie said:
KareemK said:
If you apply Occam's Razor to the Fermi Paradox you get your answer which is roughly in line with Brian Cox's.
Yes, but Cox was only talking about the Milky Way, not the universe.
confused So am I.
That's fine then, so why mention it ???????????????????????????

KareemK

Original Poster:

1,110 posts

119 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
jbudgie said:
KareemK said:
jbudgie said:
KareemK said:
If you apply Occam's Razor to the Fermi Paradox you get your answer which is roughly in line with Brian Cox's.
Yes, but Cox was only talking about the Milky Way, not the universe.
confused So am I.
That's fine then, so why mention it ???????????????????????????
Because Occams Razor likely explains the fermi paradox (in relation to why we haven't detected Aliens in our galaxy).

When you expand that to the Universe then I'd say the inter galactic distances involved pretty much explain that situation even if they exist by the bucket load in Andromeda etc.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
jbudgie said:
RobDickinson said:
Milford by robjdickinson, on Flickr
Why does the Milky Way appear as a curve in the photo ?

Is it because of the lens used ?
Its just because we are projecting a straight line across a curved sky then shooting it at a very wide angle, if you think of a basket ball/football have a straight line across the top , then rotate it away from you it will start to appear curved. ( the lens used is very 'square' but its a stitch of 33 frames to give a really big field of view)

gaz1234

5,233 posts

219 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
He is right.
But there is life elsewhere in universe

gaz1234

5,233 posts

219 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
In English?

TwigtheWonderkid

43,327 posts

150 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
cold thursday said:
The thing that I struggle with is the concept of "Nothing"

As in "Nothing existed before the big bang".

So there was Nothing (no time,space, matter...... etc)

Then there was this "Big Bang" and the universe existed and started expanding.
Expanding into what? When you blow up a balloon, it expands into the space around itself. But if there is no space outside the uninflated balloon, if there is nothing, what would it expand into?

tedmus

1,885 posts

135 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Expanding into what? When you blow up a balloon, it expands into the space around itself. But if there is no space outside the uninflated balloon, if there is nothing, what would it expand into?
This is what does my head in. We are so used to the concept of things consisting of something, down to a subatomic level, what can be beyond that?

KareemK

Original Poster:

1,110 posts

119 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
cold thursday said:
The thing that I struggle with is the concept of "Nothing"

As in "Nothing existed before the big bang".

So there was Nothing (no time,space, matter...... etc)

Then there was this "Big Bang" and the universe existed and started expanding.
Expanding into what? When you blow up a balloon, it expands into the space around itself. But if there is no space outside the uninflated balloon, if there is nothing, what would it expand into?
I believe the latest theories involve an initial expansion from and into a pre-existing 'quantum foam'.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,327 posts

150 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
KareemK said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
cold thursday said:
The thing that I struggle with is the concept of "Nothing"

As in "Nothing existed before the big bang".

So there was Nothing (no time,space, matter...... etc)

Then there was this "Big Bang" and the universe existed and started expanding.
Expanding into what? When you blow up a balloon, it expands into the space around itself. But if there is no space outside the uninflated balloon, if there is nothing, what would it expand into?
I believe the latest theories involve an initial expansion from and into a pre-existing 'quantum foam'.
Ahhh...quantum foam. It's so obvious when you think about it. hehe

cold thursday

341 posts

128 months

Friday 24th October 2014
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Ahhh...quantum foam. It's so obvious when you think about it. hehe
rofl

But then I looked it up scratchchin dude Kareem was right
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_foam

"Quantum foam is theorized to be the 'fabric' of the Universe, but cannot be observed yet because it is too small. Also, quantum foam is theorized to be created by virtual particles of very high energy. Virtual particles appear in quantum field theory, arising briefly and then annihilating during particle interactions in such a way that they affect the measured outputs of the interaction, even though the virtual particles are themselves space. These "vacuum fluctuations" affect the properties of the vacuum, giving it a nonzero energy known as vacuum energy, itself a type of zero-point energy. However, physicists are uncertain about the magnitude of this form of energy."
I'm still none the wiser smile



Edited by cold thursday on Saturday 25th October 00:09

MGJohn

10,203 posts

183 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
tight fart said:
cold thursday said:
The thing that I struggle with is the concept of "Nothing"

As in "Nothing existed before the big bang".

So there was Nothing (no time,space, matter...... etc)

Then there was this "Big Bang" and the universe existed and started expanding.
I've always thought that the universe has probably done it all before, expanding to it runs out of steam then contracting
to a singularity, then bang it starts all over again.
That's been my way of understanding the Big Bang Theory since day one. Gravity being the force driving that expansion-contracting cycle for all time. That's a lot of time.. No limit... Infinite ...

Then the mind boggles and I see what's on TV or the net....otherwise there 's a real danger of brain hurt... as in my brain hurts. smile

One final question. Why are we here?


.... and not over there ... wink

KareemK

Original Poster:

1,110 posts

119 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
Quatum Foam protagonists say that there is and never has been such a thing as 'nothing'.

No matter how 'Empty' the vacuum of space appears it is actually filled with quantum foam and quantum foam has always existed even prior to the big bang when there was no 'space'.

Yes, I know, I can't get my head around it either biggrin

TwigtheWonderkid

43,327 posts

150 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
Quantum foam sounds like a product Wilkinson Sword would launch to go with the quattro razor.

jbudgie

8,906 posts

212 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
KareemK said:
jbudgie said:
KareemK said:
jbudgie said:
KareemK said:
If you apply Occam's Razor to the Fermi Paradox you get your answer which is roughly in line with Brian Cox's.
Yes, but Cox was only talking about the Milky Way, not the universe.
confused So am I.
That's fine then, so why mention it ???????????????????????????
Because Occams Razor likely explains the fermi paradox (in relation to why we haven't detected Aliens in our galaxy).

When you expand that to the Universe then I'd say the inter galactic distances involved pretty much explain that situation even if they exist by the bucket load in Andromeda etc.
Sorry, I had forgotten that this thread was about the Milky Way only---I was assuming that we were talking about the Universe as a whole.. getmecoat

Funk

26,266 posts

209 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
There is almost certainly other inteligent life out there in our galaxy never mind universe.

As said we have been producing radio waves for ~100 years and most of those are so weak they wont really be detectable outside our own solar system. Now we have moved over to digital for most transmissions they are hard to tell apart from noise. So perhaps a window of 20-50 years we would be spotted. An incredibly small area of the MW.

The observable universe may not be the limit of what is there, its just we cant see further because on that scale , light travels very very slowly.

Even at the speed of light the spectacle we see as the galactic core is 27,000 years in the past. Think what humans were doing (or not) 27,000 years ago! Where will we be in another 27,000 years?

The extremely hard thing is discovering and communicating with other life.

Oh one more thing, for life as we understand it to come into being we need a certain abundance of elements that wouldnt have been around for a large chunk of the universes history, thse need baking in supernova etc so its likely inteligent life anywhere is a relativly (last couple billion years) recent thing.

Whatever, I love the idea that somewhere in my images is another being looking up at our patch of sky.

Milford by robjdickinson, on Flickr
Would it be possible to have a 1920x1080 download of this for my desktop pic Rob? Stunning picture!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
Funk said:
Would it be possible to have a 1920x1080 download of this for my desktop pic Rob? Stunning picture!
Thanks! It should be on Flickr big enough available for download. If not let me know

Funk

26,266 posts

209 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Funk said:
Would it be possible to have a 1920x1080 download of this for my desktop pic Rob? Stunning picture!
Thanks! It should be on Flickr big enough available for download. If not let me know
Says you've disabled all downloading of the image...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
Ah OK will sort something out when I get to my PC later

jshell

11,006 posts

205 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Thanks! It should be on Flickr big enough available for download. If not let me know
Crikey. Loving your Flickr images. Cheers! Well worth a browse through!

Andehh

7,108 posts

206 months

Saturday 25th October 2014
quotequote all
Talk about a thread that impresses & depresses in equal measures. frown