Orion Launch Today

Author
Discussion

djdest

6,542 posts

178 months

Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Wednesday 9th November 2016
quotequote all
He wants to make America great again; a moon or Mars shot would be a good piece of that. The problem of course is that it takes more than a presidential term to do it, so the next president, likely be a democrat, will scrap it again.

scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
At last a Trump policy I can agree with.

If they want to go back to the moon they need to resurrect the Altair lunar module project - which was integral to the Constellation programme.

Wow, that's some ladder... wouldn't yanks want an "Elevator" for that sort of distance? :-)

Seriously- I presume there is something other than landing fuel in that big fat bit at the bottom like accommodation and a lab?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Bigger rovers? Not the woof woof kind. More stores, air water etc. for longer stays. More crews, bigger experiment packages.

Perhaps?

funkyrobot

18,789 posts

228 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
scubadude said:
Eric Mc said:
At last a Trump policy I can agree with.

If they want to go back to the moon they need to resurrect the Altair lunar module project - which was integral to the Constellation programme.

Wow, that's some ladder... wouldn't yanks want an "Elevator" for that sort of distance? :-)

Seriously- I presume there is something other than landing fuel in that big fat bit at the bottom like accommodation and a lab?
A ladder on the moon isn't like a ladder on Earth. wink

I guess the moon is inviting for people who want to feel lighter.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
There has been a lot of engineering work done on advanced lunar landers and larger rovers. You would think that the only thing required now would be to just go ahead and build them.

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
There has been a lot of engineering work done on advanced lunar landers and larger rovers. You would think that the only thing required now would be to just go ahead and build them.
That's not the NASA way though - if the Altair project is restarted it'll be redesigned from scratch, after all, it's only taxpayer dollars :/ ( unless of course they just say to SpaceX/Blue Origin "sell us a lunar lander" )

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Good job NASA wasn't in charge of inventing the wheel. We'd still be at this stage in its implementation -




jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Good job NASA wasn't in charge of inventing the wheel. We'd still be at this stage in its implementation -


Actually, if you had the correct road profile......

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Eric Mc said:
Good job NASA wasn't in charge of inventing the wheel. We'd still be at this stage in its implementation -


Actually, if you had the correct road profile......
Or drive fast enough - as Mythbusters found out....


scubadude

2,618 posts

197 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
That's not the NASA way though - if the Altair project is restarted it'll be redesigned from scratch, after all, it's only taxpayer dollars :/ ( unless of course they just say to SpaceX/Blue Origin "sell us a lunar lander" )
Yes this ^ :-(

Although I imagine for a fee SpaceX could stick a Dragon capsule on the moon right now (might be empty to get it there but)... Blue Origin no, they haven't done orbital launches yet.

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
I bet a Delta IV heavy could get it around the moon with a tortoise smile

That's what the Russians did with their Zonds 4,5 and 6 in 1968-69. They used a Proton rocket to send stripped down Soyuz craft around the moon as a precursor to sending a man around the moon. Indeed, I reckon a single person Dragon craft could loop around the moon on the back of a Delta IV heavy launch.

The problem is that neither the Dragon nor the Delta IV heavy has been "man rated" yet.

Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
That's not the NASA way though - if the Altair project is restarted it'll be redesigned from scratch, after all, it's only taxpayer dollars :/ ( unless of course they just say to SpaceX/Blue Origin "sell us a lunar lander" )
Perhaps the fact that America will be run by a businessman not a politician might make a difference.

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
Perhaps the fact that America will be run by a businessman not a politician might make a difference.
Yeah, what is on the Moon? Nothing? What the heck we going there for.......?

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
I wish there was a smiley for splitting one's sides with laughter. This will have to do -

biglaugh


Simpo Two

85,422 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
jmorgan said:
Yeah, what is on the Moon? Nothing? What the heck we going there for.......?
If nothing else, for PR and advertising...! - in this context, national pride, just like Apollo.

And maybe minerals?

jmorgan

36,010 posts

284 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
Wait, wait...... I have it, they played golf on the Moon......

Hole 1, 4km away.....

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Thursday 10th November 2016
quotequote all
As he has a golf course at Turnberry he might as well have one at Frau Mauro.

MartG

20,679 posts

204 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
Sobering thought...

Taking Bush's January 2004 request which kicked off the Constellation programme as the starting point, by the time Orion actually flies a manned mission in 2021 it will have taken the same time to develop as the entire US manned space programme took from starting Mercury in 1958 to the last Apollo flight ( ASTP ) in 1974 - and that's if it doesn't slip or get cancelled frown

Eric Mc

Original Poster:

122,032 posts

265 months

Saturday 10th December 2016
quotequote all
That's what a lack of political will gives you.