SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
BEAM seems to be doing better today



Live on NASA TV

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
All I'm seeing is an interview with a Japanese astronaut.

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
Back at about 15:30 - they're in a Ku band video blackout until then

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
Watching now - thanks.

I was reading that they think the initial attempt stalled because the material had stuck itself together having been in a compressed state for over a year.

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
What's that small object floating to the right of BEAM?

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

198 months

Saturday 28th May 2016
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
They need to come up with something new. All of these perfect landings are getting boring biggrin

This video however is fking mind blowing.

https://youtu.be/4jEz03Z8azc

Edited by p1stonhead on Saturday 28th May 07:30
Wowzers.

RoadRunner220

945 posts

193 months

Sunday 29th May 2016
quotequote all
p1stonhead said:
They need to come up with something new. All of these perfect landings are getting boring biggrin

This video however is fking mind blowing.

https://youtu.be/4jEz03Z8azc
Absolutely incredible.

Beati Dogu

8,887 posts

139 months

Sunday 29th May 2016
quotequote all
Here's a time lapse of the BEAM module being expanded:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aciRYFKdaRU

It looks like a mushroom growing. A 4 metre long space mushroom.

This is basically a prototype of possible future space habitation. It'll be attached to the ISS for a couple of years while they test it, then jettisoned to burn up in the atmosphere.

http://www.nasa.gov/content/bigelow-expandable-act...

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Sunday 29th May 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
.... then jettisoned to burn up in the atmosphere.
A pity they can't think of a use for it and leave it attached - seems a bit of a waste

Beati Dogu

8,887 posts

139 months

Sunday 29th May 2016
quotequote all
The astronauts could use it to grow weed. wink

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Even if they just used it for storage - surely better than just dumping a few million $ worth of hardware

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Its NASA, if they keep it it means they cant order a replacement from a congressionally approved local industry for more than the first one cost...

Beati Dogu

8,887 posts

139 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
"Transhab" as it was originally known, started out as a NASA project, but congress axed it in 2000 for budgetary reasons (ironically the cost of ISS being a factor). Bigelow Aerospace took up the idea of inflatable space habitation and ran with it. The owner, Robert Bigelow, is a property magnate and he's got eyes on ultimately using this technology for the first commercial space station / space hotel.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigelow_Commercial_S...

So, NASA gets to have its project on the cheap (about $20 million), Bigelow Aerospace get lots of data to work with and very likely SpaceX will have a role in taking men and material up any new space station.

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
They won't use this module for practical purposes because it's a test item and it needs to be untouched and observed to see how exposure to the space environment affects it. If they started using it on a day to day basis it would mess up the tests.

MartG

20,672 posts

204 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
They won't use this module for practical purposes because it's a test item and it needs to be untouched and observed to see how exposure to the space environment affects it. If they started using it on a day to day basis it would mess up the tests.
OK if they were planning to return it to Earth for post-flight analysis, but as I understand it after the two year experimental phase it will simply be de-orbited. My point is that, after the experiment is over, why waste it ?

0000

13,812 posts

191 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
At a guess, they'll dock something else there more valuable than a bit more storage space?

Caruso

7,436 posts

256 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
OK if they were planning to return it to Earth for post-flight analysis, but as I understand it after the two year experimental phase it will simply be de-orbited. My point is that, after the experiment is over, why waste it ?
There's a cost to keeping it up there even if it's doing nothing - more drag, more weight and hence more fuel required to reboost the ISS orbit each time. Also, the rest of the station is certified for continued flight by the manufacturers. Whereas I'm guessing BEAM isn't. I hope at least they pack it with trash before de-orbiting.

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
And it's also taking up a useful docking port.

The astronauts will enter it, once it is safe to do so. They are planning on fitting a set of temporary lights so they can see what it looks like inside and they will be venturing in from time to time to check its physical condition.

Flooble

5,565 posts

100 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
And it's also taking up a useful docking port.

The astronauts will enter it, once it is safe to do so. They are planning on fitting a set of temporary lights so they can see what it looks like inside and they will be venturing in from time to time to check its physical condition.
I wonder what sort of temporary lights the astronauts are planning? Space Disco :-)

Eric Mc

121,992 posts

265 months

Monday 30th May 2016
quotequote all
Candles?
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED