SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
There are also two Dragonlab flights pencilled in this year. Dragonlab is a free-flying science mission, similar to the recent one flown by China, with a flight duration of up to 2 years

http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/pdf/Drago...
Ah cool didnt realise they offered that.

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
MartG said:
There are also two Dragonlab flights pencilled in this year. Dragonlab is a free-flying science mission, similar to the recent one flown by China, with a flight duration of up to 2 years

http://www.spacex.com/sites/spacex/files/pdf/Drago...
Ah cool didnt realise they offered that.
Must admit I didn't either until I checked their flight manifest an hour ago biggrin

http://www.spacex.com/missions

scubadude

2,618 posts

198 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
You can see why the first stage looks a bit scorched when it gets back.
Impressive footage too. Amazing what those old WB-57s can do.
Impressive footage both the taking of it and the content.

Given the media savvy SpaceX I wonder if they will fully film from onboard a boost back and descent/landing at some point?


Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
They certainly could do, they have little Go-Pro derived cameras all over it, including inside the tanks and on the nose cone fairings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u656se4e34M

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
Seems the neighbours are moaning about the noise

http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/McGregor--City-mo...

I suspect SpaceX will gradually move that work to their new centre near Brownsville

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
From what I hear, SpaceX have been taking the piss a bit with the times they test. Obviously they have a lot of work to do and some of it runs quite late.

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
From what I hear, SpaceX have been taking the piss a bit with the times they test. Obviously they have a lot of work to do and some of it runs quite late.
With the planned increase in launch frequency it can only get worse - hence why I think SpaceX will move testing of new engines/stages elsewhere

hidetheelephants

24,448 posts

194 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
MartG said:
Beati Dogu said:
From what I hear, SpaceX have been taking the piss a bit with the times they test. Obviously they have a lot of work to do and some of it runs quite late.
With the planned increase in launch frequency it can only get worse - hence why I think SpaceX will move testing of new engines/stages elsewhere
There are spare test stands at Sandown on the IoW or Spadeadam in Cumbria; they'd probably sell tickets to view it never mind complain about the noise. hehe

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

99 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
hidetheelephants said:
MartG said:
Beati Dogu said:
From what I hear, SpaceX have been taking the piss a bit with the times they test. Obviously they have a lot of work to do and some of it runs quite late.
With the planned increase in launch frequency it can only get worse - hence why I think SpaceX will move testing of new engines/stages elsewhere
There are spare test stands at Sandown on the IoW or Spadeadam in Cumbria; they'd probably sell tickets to view it never mind complain about the noise. hehe
thumbup

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 12th May 2016
quotequote all
Here's some drone footage of the returned landing ship and offloaded rocket.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86CZQKOY7lw

Looks like they welded this one down too. A sensible precaution.

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Saturday 14th May 2016
quotequote all
The next Dragon to fly has left the factory for Florida

https://www.instagram.com/p/BFXcK_Cl8cO/

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

99 months

Saturday 14th May 2016
quotequote all
Chect this vid out...

https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=299s&v=3yuq8nUSd...


the sequence is launch, main burn up the side of some clouds [visually] meco behind cloud, rocket u!!owered flight, seperation then second stage fires, first stage close by then at 3:57 you se the thrusters fire on stage 1 to pitch it up & fairing sep and more rcs shots!!!!

amazing footage.

Edited by Sylvaforever on Saturday 14th May 21:20

Eric Mc

122,050 posts

266 months

Saturday 14th May 2016
quotequote all
Nice footage. I think some of the amateur filming of these launches is pretty good.

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

99 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
Actually Eric it turns out there could be more to it.

Musk, at the previous launch debrief aluded to recovering the shroud sections "as that'd be a few million saved"

Their is now speculation that they are in the process of developing just this and there is evidence re the rcs puffs seen in the video along with the positioning of the shroud sections this was an experiment along these lines....

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
Good footage that. Nice that you can see the payload shrouds being ejected as well. I guess that once they're out of the atmosphere, they've done their job and are just dead weight. They flutter down to the ocean at the moment, but presumably they'll try bringing them down more gently on parachutes.

Incidentally, the 2 booster rockets on the Falcon Heavy will have their own nose cones. Presumably they'll keep these attached throughout their entire flight.

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
Three landed rockets


RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
This gives you a sense of scale you dont get with the landing videos..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To_TihIDgnw

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Sunday 15th May 2016
quotequote all
"The Verge" article on SpaceX with some more photos of the 3 rockets in the hanger.

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/15/11676080/spacex-...

MartG

20,688 posts

205 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
It seems the most recently landed Falcon may not be reuseable, due to damage incurred during re-entry and landing. I suspect SpaceX will modify future vehicles using similar high-energy trajectories to better withstand the return flight

http://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/nation-now/2016...

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Tuesday 17th May 2016
quotequote all
Yeah it came in hot. I guess for those missions they can look at adding more heat shield etc. Landing an unusable rocket probably not worth the effort otherwise, although they can cannibalise engines etc if they are good.

The first f9 looks like the guinea pig for a relaunch.
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED