SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Boo. No fun.


The upgraded Falcon 9 he's referring to is the forthcoming "Block 5" version. This will be more powerful and has been redesigned to make it easier to reuse, no doubt incorporating lessons learned from the rockets they've got back.

Flooble

5,565 posts

100 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Boo. No fun.


The upgraded Falcon 9 he's referring to is the forthcoming "Block 5" version. This will be more powerful and has been redesigned to make it easier to reuse, no doubt incorporating lessons learned from the rockets they've got back.
Will it still need the cryogenic densification to loft the heavy payloads?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Monday 23rd January 2017
quotequote all
yep they've got about a 30% increase in thrust between that and the new engines afik.

Block 5 is made for reuse, seems the older ones must have issues so are only going to be reused 1-2 times.

Anything too heavy for a recoverable f9 soon will be on the f9h anyhow.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th January 2017
quotequote all

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th January 2017
quotequote all
Falcon 9 reported to be vertical on the historic LC39A pad - no pics yet

Edit - apparently not, just an erector test frown Won't be long though...

Edited by MartG on Thursday 26th January 20:49

Beati Dogu

8,892 posts

139 months

Thursday 26th January 2017
quotequote all
Since it's not coming back, they'll probably take the legs off.

In the spirit of Colin Chapman, there's no point taking them for a free ride. Plus more fuel for the main mission.

outnumbered

4,087 posts

234 months

Thursday 26th January 2017
quotequote all
Dark85 said:
Oh cool. I'm actually in Florida at the end of Feb, has anyone here ever been to a launch/have any tips?
We watched one last summer from Cocoa Beach. Anywhere on the seafront within a few miles of the cape has a pretty good view.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Since it's not coming back, they'll probably take the legs off.

In the spirit of Colin Chapman, there's no point taking them for a free ride. Plus more fuel for the main mission.
They'll remove everything they can to save weight - legs, grid fins & actuators, etc

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Hmm don't know about that there's the Q factor to consider don't forget..

SystemParanoia

14,343 posts

198 months

Friday 27th January 2017
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
Hmm don't know about that there's the Q factor to consider don't forget..


I dont think he'll be a problem hehe

Sylvaforever

2,212 posts

98 months

Saturday 28th January 2017
quotequote all
OK numbnuts.

Simply put if the rocket accelerates faster than normal due to hardware weight reduction it will mean that it reaches the Q point earlier, lower and be subjected to higher and longer loading than previous launches of this version of booster.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th January 2017
quotequote all
Sylvaforever said:
OK numbnuts.

Simply put if the rocket accelerates faster than normal due to hardware weight reduction it will mean that it reaches the Q point earlier, lower and be subjected to higher and longer loading than previous launches of this version of booster.
Reduction in booster mass is offset by the higher payload mass

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Saturday 28th January 2017
quotequote all
They dont have to burn all the engines at 100% they can just go as quick as before but for a little longer or accelerate more later...

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Saturday 28th January 2017
quotequote all
Which is what the Space Shuttle used to do.

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Saturday 28th January 2017
quotequote all


Transporter/erector test ahead of Friday's launch smile

MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Sunday 29th January 2017
quotequote all
Friday's launch rumoured to be delayed to the end of Feb, with CRS10 being the next launch instead


MartG

20,678 posts

204 months

Sunday 29th January 2017
quotequote all
A press statement from SpaceX (via the private space forum NASASpaceflight)

"SpaceX announced today that its first launch from Launch Complex 39A (LC-39A) at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida will be the CRS-10 mission to the International Space Station. The launch is currently targeted for no earlier than mid-February. Following the launch of CRS-10, first commercial mission from 39A is currently slated to be EchoStar XXIII. This schedule change allows time for additional testing of ground systems ahead of the CRS-10 mission. The launch vehicles, Dragon, and the EchoStar satellite are all healthy and prepared for launch."

Eric Mc

122,032 posts

265 months

Monday 30th January 2017
quotequote all
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED