SpaceX Tuesday...
Discussion
ninja-lewis said:
The next goal is a 24 hour turnaround so presumably they will have to leave them uncleaned at that point.
Yup thats the plan according to Elon, at the moment this one was a little bit like triggers broom as most of the components were changed for this 'reusable' unitBeati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:
"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it) "Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily
SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress
Buzz84 said:
Beati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:
"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it) "Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily
SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress
Buzz84 said:
Beati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:
"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it) "Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily
SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress
All (as far as I'm aware) previous 1st stage landings have to involved a boost back burn, I.e. The rocket turns around and heads back towards KSC (but lands on the barge off the coast.
The first stage of the SES-10 would not have been able to do that without running out of fuel, (due to a higher orbit requirement for the satellite) so it just followed it sub-orbital trajectory, and landed further out, I'm guessing this would mean that it's atmospheric reentry speed would be increased, possibly causing the paint on the grid fin to ignite/melt
-this is just my observation, not backed up by any info from Space X.
The first stage of the SES-10 would not have been able to do that without running out of fuel, (due to a higher orbit requirement for the satellite) so it just followed it sub-orbital trajectory, and landed further out, I'm guessing this would mean that it's atmospheric reentry speed would be increased, possibly causing the paint on the grid fin to ignite/melt
-this is just my observation, not backed up by any info from Space X.
Gassing Station | Science! | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff