SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Friday 31st March 2017
quotequote all
"We think this one has some historic value, so we are thinking the Cape might like to have it as something to remember the moment. We are going to present it as a gift to the Cape." — Elon Musk

Looks like it will be on display at the KSC visitor centre smile

Beati Dogu

8,883 posts

139 months

Friday 31st March 2017
quotequote all
Tweets from Elon Musk today‏:

"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."

"Falcon Heavy test flight currently scheduled for late summer"


Ooooh. clap



Toaster

2,938 posts

193 months

Friday 31st March 2017
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
The next goal is a 24 hour turnaround so presumably they will have to leave them uncleaned at that point.
Yup thats the plan according to Elon, at the moment this one was a little bit like triggers broom as most of the components were changed for this 'reusable' unit

Beati Dogu

8,883 posts

139 months

Saturday 1st April 2017
quotequote all
Here's some great photos of the launch:

https://spaceflightnow.com/2017/04/01/photos-space...

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Saturday 1st April 2017
quotequote all
Apparently Musk says six more launches of recovered first stages are planned for this year. smile

Whether that includes 2 ( or 3 ) for Falcon Heavy....

Buzz84

1,140 posts

149 months

Sunday 2nd April 2017
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:

"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it)

Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily

SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress

p1stonhead

25,527 posts

167 months

Sunday 2nd April 2017
quotequote all
Buzz84 said:
Beati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:

"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it)

Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily

SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress
His employees just gave a collective groan knowing that they now can't sleep for the next 6 months.

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Sunday 2nd April 2017
quotequote all
Buzz84 said:
Beati Dogu said:
Tweets from Elon Musk today?:

"Considering trying to bring upper stage back on Falcon Heavy demo flight for full reusability. Odds of success low, but maybe worth a shot."
That's the beauty of SpaceX and Elon, in order to do that, the second stage will need to be upgraded to include all the parts needed to allow recovery (landing struts, grid fins etc depending on how they intend to do it)

Any other company, wouldn't be spending that sort of money unnecessarily

SpaceX are more like, "meh, why not" and that's the way to make progress
The real issue is re-entry, the 2nd stage is travelling at orbital velocity, so needs a heat shield

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Sunday 2nd April 2017
quotequote all
which makes it heavy, where every kilo counts.

Perhaps some 2nd stages on a heavy..

Eric Mc

121,947 posts

265 months

Monday 3rd April 2017
quotequote all
Post launch press conference -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlF3fmndtY0

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
Looks like some damage around the grid fin area frown


FurtiveFreddy

8,577 posts

237 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
MartG said:
Looks like some damage around the grid fin area frown

Isn't that why they're going to forge them from titanium in the future?

Brother D

3,716 posts

176 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
FurtiveFreddy said:
MartG said:
Looks like some damage around the grid fin area frown
Isn't that why they're going to forge them from titanium in the future?
They are - from the reentry video they don't look big, but they are 4ft by 5ft in size!

Eric Mc

121,947 posts

265 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
You can get compression hypersonic shock waves coming off protuberances which are extremely hot at the shock front. That's what melted off the lower ventral and dummy ramjet on the X-15 Mach 6.7 flight in 1967.

I wouldn't be surprised if that is what we are seeing here.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
The first stage re-entry video from SES-10 clearly showed a grid-fin on fire, hence the titanium decision.

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
A couple of closeups ( pics by Kevin Frack )




Beati Dogu

8,883 posts

139 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
Here's one next to a man for scale:



He's fitting anti-bird spikes to it because this is the rocket outside the SpaceX factory in LA.

They show the grid fins deployed on that rocket, although in reality they fold them in after landing.

callmedave

2,686 posts

145 months

Tuesday 4th April 2017
quotequote all
All (as far as I'm aware) previous 1st stage landings have to involved a boost back burn, I.e. The rocket turns around and heads back towards KSC (but lands on the barge off the coast.
The first stage of the SES-10 would not have been able to do that without running out of fuel, (due to a higher orbit requirement for the satellite) so it just followed it sub-orbital trajectory, and landed further out, I'm guessing this would mean that it's atmospheric reentry speed would be increased, possibly causing the paint on the grid fin to ignite/melt

-this is just my observation, not backed up by any info from Space X.

Eric Mc

121,947 posts

265 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
I think it was the actual metal that started to burn. Aluminium starts to melt at around 400 degrees C.

MartG

20,666 posts

204 months

Wednesday 5th April 2017
quotequote all
SpaceX have revised their quoted payload for Falcon Heavy from 54,200kg up to 64,000kg into LEO
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED