SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
He's keeping a good sense of humour on this. Landing a tall cylindrical object vertically on legs is not easy - especially after it has fallen back from an altitude of 50 odd miles.

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Latest tweets indicate an issue with a control valve which led to the engine gimballing getting out of phase with the rockets movements

“Looks like Falcon landed fine, but excess lateral velocity caused it to tip over post landing,” said Elon Musk via his Twitter account (@ElonMusk) after launch. “Either not enough thrust to stabilize or a leg was damaged. Data review needed.”

“Looks like the issue was stiction in the biprop throttle valve, resulting in control system phase lag,” added Musk this evening. “Should be easy to fix.”

Still showing the legs as they were deploying


Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
A bit like Pilot Induced Oscillation - only in this case the pilot was a computer.

p1stonhead

25,556 posts

168 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Still a remarkable achievement to get even that close in my opinion. Just amazing.

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
A bit like Pilot Induced Oscillation - only in this case the pilot was a computer.
Yup - that's what it sounds like

HorneyMX5

5,309 posts

151 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
How did I not know about all this. Just incredible.

slybynight

391 posts

122 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Indeed - why doesn't everyone in the world know about this with live broadcast on ALL channels??
Because the world is full of sad to55ers, obsessing over Shasney's latest bum selfie, thats why! We're devolving people I tells ya!

Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
No, WE'RE not.

It's to do with what the people who work in the MEDIA like.

These days, the broadcast nedia is populated by ninnies who love tittle tattle and gossip and silliness.

Back in the 50s and right through to the 80s it was peopled with people who had diverse, often technical or military backgrounds - so they were genuinely interested in engineering and science. That is why there were so many programmes of that type on TV in those days.

Now, all they want to show is the light, frothy and airy fairy stuff they THINK we should like because THEY like it.

That's the bad news. The good news is that the good stuff can still be got at - through the internet. If you want to keep abreast of space shots and space technology, there's no point in waiting for mainstream TV to keep you alert as to what is happening.
Use the internet. It's all there.

Richjam

318 posts

189 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Saw this pass over the uk about 20 mins after launch. Not as bright as the ISS but quite cool all the same.

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
HiRes video of the landing on Facebook - sorry, don't have a link for the original video

https://www.facebook.com/john.t.mcbride/videos/101...

Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Excellent images.

It does look to me that the rate of descent is just too high at the moment. I would think that there just isn't enough thrust from the motor to slow the descent rate down enough. They really would want the the thing to actually stop at least 50 feet above the barge and then begin a nice controlled and gentle let down onto the barge. It's all looking a bit frantic at the moment.

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
I think the weight constraints would prevent them using a more measured approach like you suggest Eric. Minimum fuel burn ( and hence minimum weight ) would be to decelerate in such a way as to hit zero velocity at zero altitude with no fuel left.

Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
That's what I assumed. They just can't load enough fuel into the thing to have enough spare at the end of the descent to give them any hover (i.e. "sorting out" ) time. It's got to be 100% on the money 100% of the time - with no margin for error.

I still think it is always going to be a bit acey deucy even if they do manage it every so often.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Excellent images.

It does look to me that the rate of descent is just too high at the moment. I would think that there just isn't enough thrust from the motor to slow the descent rate down enough. They really would want the the thing to actually stop at least 50 feet above the barge and then begin a nice controlled and gentle let down onto the barge. It's all looking a bit frantic at the moment.
Rate of descent and the landing is because of engine power.

The minimum thrust of a single engine is way above the weight of the stage 1 itself. It cant slow down and have controlled gentle let down'. it has to fire at just the right time to scrub downward momentum as it touches down

London424

12,829 posts

176 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
Can't see that other vid post but here's Musks link

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/58846319307002...

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

199 months

Wednesday 15th April 2015
quotequote all
So close...a bit less angle, a bit more thrust from the rcs thruster at the top. Still, explosions are cool too.
Pleased they're being so transparent about it all.

twin40s

153 posts

256 months

Thursday 16th April 2015
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Eric Mc said:
Excellent images.

It does look to me that the rate of descent is just too high at the moment. I would think that there just isn't enough thrust from the motor to slow the descent rate down enough. They really would want the the thing to actually stop at least 50 feet above the barge and then begin a nice controlled and gentle let down onto the barge. It's all looking a bit frantic at the moment.
Rate of descent and the landing is because of engine power.

The minimum thrust of a single engine is way above the weight of the stage 1 itself. It cant slow down and have controlled gentle let down'. it has to fire at just the right time to scrub downward momentum as it touches down
The Grasshopper test flights had to carry ballast so they could hover.
Looks like they got that bit pretty close though, zero velocity at zero altitude.

Cool stuff

MartG

20,689 posts

205 months

Eric Mc

122,051 posts

266 months

Thursday 16th April 2015
quotequote all
With a touchdown speed of around 90 mph and not being completely vertical, I recon one of the legs gave way
TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED