SpaceX Tuesday...

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED
Author
Discussion

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
They've put the priority on getting the fairly hefty (just over 5 tonne) satellite into orbit quicker.

The first stage only runs for about 3 minutes before separating. Instead of firing 3 of the 9 engines for the boostback burn, it's going to continue on a ballistic trajectory.

They'll use the cold gas thrusters at the top of the 1st stage to reorientate it, main engines to slow it and then steer it down through the atmosphere using the fold out "grid fins". Hopefully landing it on the centre engine alone.


The weather is predicted to be 80% go for tonight and 95% for Friday night as an alternate.
if they pull this off it will be really something...

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Yes, there's a lot that can go wrong.

It makes it even more amazing that even the previous failures have occurred right at the very end of the process.

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
If it wasn't for the hardness of the ground, they'd have been OK.

Maybe they should land on a big springy mattress - a bit like the rubber deck tried by teh Royal Navy.

scubadude

2,618 posts

198 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
The first stage only runs for about 3 minutes before separating. Instead of firing 3 of the 9 engines for the boostback burn, it's going to continue on a ballistic trajectory.

They'll use the cold gas thrusters at the top of the 1st stage to reorientate it, main engines to slow it and then steer it down through the atmosphere using the fold out "grid fins". Hopefully landing it on the centre engine alone.
Previously I have wondered if, rather than the elaborate boost-back it wouldn't be better to keep going and land somewhere in the direction its going.
I know in this instance it's 500-ish miles out to sea. I wonder in future if they might not "fly" them to Elon's Island lair or even- how much fuel would it need to "coast" across the Atlantic and land in Europe or Africa?

Beyond that, if they make them reliable enough what's to stop them topping up the tank and sending the first stage back to the US launch site on its own?

Perhaps SpaceX should have a series of sites 1000miles apart around the globe where used 1st stages arrive after launching something Eastward, fuel up, new payload and lift off again then land at the next station and repeat? :-)

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
If they land back near base they don't have the added transport delays and costs getting them back to their facility there.

Theoretically they could launch from their site in Texas (under construction now) and land it at Cape Canaveral, Florida. However that would never be allowed as it'd mean overflying central Florida and the city of Orlando.

It also doesn't actually fly that far down range. As mentioned earlier it only runs for around 3 minutes and most of that is upwards obviously. They do cant it out over the sea for safety & satellite orbitary reasons, but it just wouldn't make it all the way across the Atlantic. The barge is only a few hundred miles down range.





Edited by Beati Dogu on Thursday 25th February 18:13

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Beati Dogu said:
They do cant it out over the sea for safety & satellite orbitary reasons, but it just wouldn't make it all the way across the Atlantic. The barge is only a few hundred miles down range.
to be fair, it's some 500 miles out and that still with it 'turning round' at top of the plot.

I don't think it would take much more to get it across the pond, however, unless you plan on duplicating the operations base in the UK, you then have to ship it back (although would it fit in a cargo plane? (it's 41.2m long, 3.66m round and weighs in at some 26 tonnes).


Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
The barge is 410 miles out and the rocket isn't doing a back flip this time round. There's no way it'd make it across the Atlantic.

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Yes - a first stage doesn't have enough speed or altitude to make it all the way across the Atlantic.

AnotherClarkey

3,596 posts

190 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Great coverage on the live webcast. I love the way they are so transparent.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
bah aborted

MartG

20,685 posts

205 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
Damn

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
That was a but sudden. I wonder what the problem was.

paolow

3,209 posts

259 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
shame - I was starting to get excited!

Beati Dogu

8,896 posts

140 months

Thursday 25th February 2016
quotequote all
A slow propellant loading issue it seems.

They can launch at this time any day once they get permission and the problem resolved of course.

MartG

20,685 posts

205 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
I think with the superchilled fuel they have to leave loading until the last minute, so any delay in fuelling means they have to abort

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

255 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
Somewhat ironic as the presenters had just finished telling us how they have added new LOX storage tanks and its all super fast and shiny. ...

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
That's what I eventually concluded last might. The brand new super efficient fueling system somehow let them down. They need to go back to that old "!Apollo Era" spherical storage tank he mentioned.

callmedave

2,686 posts

146 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
That's what I eventually concluded last might. The brand new super efficient fueling system somehow let them down. They need to go back to that old "!Apollo Era" spherical storage tank he mentioned.
Not to 'do a toaster' on you but I disagree, we have to try new ideas and fix issues in order to improve.

They will go back and Analize the issue and do what they can to improve it, the two presenters were talking about what improvements they had already made, the list will get longer.


Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
This is not the first time they have used supercooled O2, but this.time they need to get every kg they can in it.

Eric Mc

122,043 posts

266 months

Friday 26th February 2016
quotequote all
callmedave said:
Eric Mc said:
That's what I eventually concluded last might. The brand new super efficient fueling system somehow let them down. They need to go back to that old "!Apollo Era" spherical storage tank he mentioned.
Not to 'do a toaster' on you but I disagree, we have to try new ideas and fix issues in order to improve.

They will go back and Analize the issue and do what they can to improve it, the two presenters were talking about what improvements they had already made, the list will get longer.
I agree. I was being a bit facetious. I'm sure they'll sort out whatever the issue was and get it off. However, I expect it might be at least a few more days before they try again.

TOPIC CLOSED
TOPIC CLOSED