Another Universe question

Another Universe question

Author
Discussion

Capt Bravz

344 posts

160 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Should have taken the Bugatti Veyron, and saved some time.
Yeah, but IMHO the Lambo looks nicer and if I'm cruising space I want to look good. Don't forget also I wasn't maxing the car just a steady 200 mph ;-)

scorp

8,783 posts

229 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Voyager 1 is doing 62,136 km/h and still took 36 years to leave the solar system!
Interestingly, if you constantly accelerated at 1G you would hit the speed of light in around a year (ignoring relativity)

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
N8CYL said:
To help a simpleton like me get a handle on the size of the universe, if the sun was the size of a grain of sand, how big would the known universe be?
N8CYL - this was a nice link posted not long ago when trying to comprehend how long forever is, ie how long religious people want to live in the afterlife.

Part of it gives you an idea of how big the known universe is.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/11/1000000-grahams-numb...

N8CYL

Original Poster:

460 posts

150 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
N8CYL - this was a nice link posted not long ago when trying to comprehend how long forever is, ie how long religious people want to live in the afterlife.

Part of it gives you an idea of how big the known universe is.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/11/1000000-grahams-numb...
Not seen this before, its mind blowing really, but well written. Its also amazing that in some ways we are so small in respect to the vastness of space but also so big in the minuscule world of atomic particles.

CrutyRammers

13,735 posts

198 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
N8CYL - this was a nice link posted not long ago when trying to comprehend how long forever is, ie how long religious people want to live in the afterlife.

Part of it gives you an idea of how big the known universe is.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/11/1000000-grahams-numb...
Well, I'd heard of it and not thought much about it. Now my soul aches. Thanks. smile

kowalski655

14,643 posts

143 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
Capt Bravz said:
Yeah, but IMHO the Lambo looks nicer and if I'm cruising space I want to look good. Don't forget also I wasn't maxing the car just a steady 200 mph ;-)
And if you break down,then you will have to wait 2000 years for the RAC to get to you.

TwigtheWonderkid

43,370 posts

150 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
kowalski655 said:
Capt Bravz said:
Yeah, but IMHO the Lambo looks nicer and if I'm cruising space I want to look good. Don't forget also I wasn't maxing the car just a steady 200 mph ;-)
And if you break down,then you will have to wait 2000 years for the RAC to get to you.
No change there then.

annodomini2

6,861 posts

251 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
scorp said:
RobDickinson said:
Voyager 1 is doing 62,136 km/h and still took 36 years to leave the solar system!
Interestingly, if you constantly accelerated at 1G you would hit the speed of light in around a year (ignoring relativity)
You still would, but generating the force to continue to accelerate at 1G is the issue.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

244 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
annodomini2 said:
scorp said:
RobDickinson said:
Voyager 1 is doing 62,136 km/h and still took 36 years to leave the solar system!
Interestingly, if you constantly accelerated at 1G you would hit the speed of light in around a year (ignoring relativity)
You still would, but generating the force to continue to accelerate at 1G is the issue.
Time dilation would mean that it wouldn't seem as long either, plus of course the tendency towards C would be asymptotic.

p1stonhead

25,549 posts

167 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Voyager 1 is doing 62,136 km/h and still took 36 years to leave the solar system!
Download space engine to really see what a ridiculous size the universe is. It's an incredible game/programme.

Dr Jekyll

23,820 posts

261 months

Wednesday 11th March 2015
quotequote all

N8CYL

Original Poster:

460 posts

150 months

Friday 13th March 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
N8CYL said:
To help a simpleton like me get a handle on the size of the universe, if the sun was the size of a grain of sand, how big would the known universe be?
N8CYL - this was a nice link posted not long ago when trying to comprehend how long forever is, ie how long religious people want to live in the afterlife.

Part of it gives you an idea of how big the known universe is.

http://waitbutwhy.com/2014/11/1000000-grahams-numb...
The fact about atoms in a grain of salt is mind blowing.

Baron Greenback

6,982 posts

150 months

Saturday 14th March 2015
quotequote all
This article is a bit beyond me but Milky Way galaxy is at least 50 percent larger than is commonly estimated! Extending the known width of the Milky Way from 100,000 light years across to 150,000 light years!

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-corrugated-galaxy-mil...

kowalski655

14,643 posts

143 months

Saturday 14th March 2015
quotequote all

"The Galaxy,ribbed for her pleasure" biggrin

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
I'm an amateur photographer and was just looking at images of the Milky Way (Due to reading this last couple of posts on the thread) and some of the photographs look amazing and you can see the bright centre as illusrtated in many images too.

Like these for example




Then I came across this image. This photograph just wins. the only image which is going to beat this is a picture of the earth exploding or being eaten up by our sun.


Moonhawk

10,730 posts

219 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
Then I came across this image. This photograph just wins. the only image which is going to beat this is a picture of the earth exploding or being eaten up by our sun.

That last one isn't a photograph - it even says so in the bottom left corner wink

Cool image though.

IvanSTi

635 posts

119 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
Moonhawk said:
IvanSTi said:
Then I came across this image. This photograph just wins. the only image which is going to beat this is a picture of the earth exploding or being eaten up by our sun.

That last one isn't a photograph - it even says so in the bottom left corner wink

Cool image though.
You're right, I am disappointed. The search continues for the ultimate image.

I didn't notice that in the bottom left as I'm using a 1/4 of my screen for the interweb so no one can see what I'm doing hehe

http://gizmodo.com/5912184/this-mind-blowing-image...

qube_TA

8,402 posts

245 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
Capt Bravz said:
TwigtheWonderkid said:
Should have taken the Bugatti Veyron, and saved some time.
Yeah, but IMHO the Lambo looks nicer and if I'm cruising space I want to look good. Don't forget also I wasn't maxing the car just a steady 200 mph ;-)
comfort is important on long trips.



Liquid Schwartz can help save time too.



RobDickinson

31,343 posts

254 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
IvanSTi said:
I'm an amateur photographer and was just looking at images of the Milky Way (Due to reading this last couple of posts on the thread) and some of the photographs look amazing and you can see the bright centre as illusrtated in many images too.

Like these for example




Then I came across this image. This photograph just wins. the only image which is going to beat this is a picture of the earth exploding or being eaten up by our sun.

Yep that last one is CGI.

Astro photography is good fun but you need dark skies to pull it off ( you can in some places in the UK).

I have an astro workshop this friday at Aoraki dark sky reserve (gold standard, bortle scape 1-2).

This from a few weekends ago.
100 million by robjdickinson, on Flickr

PhysDoc

62 posts

109 months

Monday 16th March 2015
quotequote all
I know a thing or two about this. Can't remember the exact figures off-hand and this is only a rough and ready estimate, but the universe is roughly 15 billion=15x10^9 years old, which means the observable universe is roughly 15 billion=15x10^9 light years across (Because light travels 1 light year in a year, and it has `only' had 15 billion years to travel.)

One light year is about 10^13km, so the observable universe is roughly 1.5x10^23km across. The diameter of the sun is roughly 1.5x10^6km, so the observable universe is 1.5x10^23/1.5x10^6=10^17 times larger than the sun.

So if the sun was only about 0.1mm across -- I guess roughly the size of a grain of sand -- the observable universe would be 10^16mm=10^10km which I think is roughly the same diameter as the solar system.

May have made a mistake though.