Mobile phones dangers when used inside cars

Mobile phones dangers when used inside cars

Author
Discussion

PoleDriver

28,638 posts

194 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all

budfox

1,510 posts

129 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Mate of mine had radiation poisoning and died in his car. Mind you, it was hit by a train.

citizensm1th

8,371 posts

137 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
untakenname said:
Btw when it comes to wattage emitted Tetra/Airwave basestations put out far more RF and so does wifi.
yes lets ban male children from using laptops/ipads and irradiating their nads

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
One other thing...As far as i know a reflected microwave would have far less energy associated with it and would not pose a real risk

Unless it was a ricocheting 800W Bosch - then I'd duck

t400ble

1,804 posts

121 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Silent1 said:
What a load of utter bullst!
Agreed.

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
rikNorad said:
A car is a Faraday cage; not perfect and that's why we have signal but.....why a lightning that hits a car don't kill the occupants? Because we are inside a Faraday cage.
About the independent studies: as stated in the first post: Bioinitiative and even the IARC classifies mobile phones as possible carcinogenic.
Lightning is massively different to microwave radiation. It doesnt radiate, for a start.

How is a phone carcinogenic?

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

175 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
rikNorad said:
A car is a Faraday cage; not perfect and that's why we have signal but.....why a lightning that hits a car don't kill the occupants? Because we are inside a Faraday cage.
About the independent studies: as stated in the first post: Bioinitiative and even the IARC classifies mobile phones as possible carcinogenic.
rofl..........oh wait your serious

Impasse

15,099 posts

241 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
The solution seems to be buy a Lotus. Composite body panels for the win and for the unfried testicles.

1878

821 posts

163 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
One of my favourite songs


spikeyhead

17,320 posts

197 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Inertiatic said:
Lightning is massively different to microwave radiation. It doesnt radiate, for a start.

How is a phone carcinogenic?
If you eat a mobile phone every day it's likely to cancer, or some other health issue.

Munter

31,319 posts

241 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
rikNorad said:
I used the lightning as an example just to make clear that I'm a fking moron.
wink

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
rikNorad said:
I used the lightning as an example just to make clear that a car actually IS a faraday cage, an imperfect cage that even if let the mobile phone signal go through, part of these radiations keep bouncing inside the car and end absorbed by the bodies of occupants.

Many people spend a lot of time inside their cars: the fact that we spend a lot of time with these devices very close to our body should not justify having them also in the car but instead keep them off the body always.
Thats not how a Faraday cage works though...one size doesnt fit all.

You may have a point regarding keeping phones off the body, but that's due to the thermal nature of microwave radiation that promotes tissue growth...but this is over a very long time and AFAIK was associated primarily with the early analogue phones that used more power. Not even sure if a proven link was established...

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
spikeyhead said:
If you eat a mobile phone every day it's likely to cancer, or some other health issue.
The new phablets would be hard to pass, that's for sure

V8forweekends

2,481 posts

124 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
daytona365 said:
I quite agree. Secondhand cars that have been thus subjected to radiation should be viewed the same way as cars that have been smoked in, and should be sold at a good discount.........If money's more important than the obvious risks involved that is.
laughlaugh

KrazyIvan

4,341 posts

175 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
I take it your posting this from some sort of tofu powered abacus...

rasto

2,188 posts

237 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Lowtimer said:
Well, this is the first time I've seen a poster on here who might *actually* be about to recommend us all to wear tinfoil hats. Don't disappoint us, OP.
rofl

citizensm1th

8,371 posts

137 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
im more worried about the one point twenty-one jigowatts flux capacitor in my car

it stops me receiving mark and lard one radio 1 so it cant be good

F3RNY7

545 posts

164 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Jimmy! I can't get PistonHeads up on this damn thing!


Le TVR

3,092 posts

251 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
rikNorad said:
A car is a Faraday cage
Yes, but not at the frequency involved.
Any aperture in a Faraday cage must be less than around 1% of the wavelength involved.
It may be a Faraday cage at 1 MHz but at 900 or 1800 MHz it will be as effective as a chocolate fireguard.

rikNorad said:
.....why a lightning that hits a car don't kill the occupants?
Because the car body is acting as an ESD shield.
ESD is a totally different phenomena to RF.

rikNorad said:
About the independent studies: as stated in the first post: Bioinitiative and even the IARC classifies mobile phones as possible carcinogenic.
WHO and INCIRP said:
Studies to date provide no indication that environmental exposure to RF fields, such as from base stations, increases the risk of cancer or any other disease.

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Monday 4th May 2015
quotequote all
Le TVR delivers the finishing move...