What the.... alternative space elevator

What the.... alternative space elevator

Author
Discussion

RizzoTheRat

Original Poster:

25,155 posts

192 months

Monday 17th August 2015
quotequote all
Anyone seen this?
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/17/spa...

Not sure I'd fancy being in an aircraft trying to land on a 20km tall inflatable tower! Nutters.

Halmyre

11,190 posts

139 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
RizzoTheRat said:
Anyone seen this?
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/aug/17/spa...

Not sure I'd fancy being in an aircraft trying to land on a 20km tall inflatable tower! Nutters.
I'll have whatever he's having.

Some Gump

12,688 posts

186 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
wow, an infinitely strong, wind impervious stick. Easy to engineer.

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
Maybe they should try building a 1km tall structure, before going to 5km, then 10km, then 15km, then 20km.

MrBrightSi

2,912 posts

170 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
I've been hearing about space elevators for years and years.

Be nice to see one attempted, it would take a lot of the complexities of exiting earths atmosphere out of the question. However, the im guessing the complexities of keeping something suspended in orbit while being tethered to the earth is just as hard but JFK said it best:

"We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too."

xRIEx

8,180 posts

148 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
MrBrightSi said:
Be nice to see one attempted, it would take a lot of the complexities of exiting earths atmosphere out of the question.
I'm sure some very smart people have done the sums for both sides of the argument, but how much energy will it take to pump the required fuel for the air/spacecraft up 20km, along with raising an elevator of x mass?

I suppose they can use regenerative methods when the elevator 'falls' to earth, but still.

RizzoTheRat

Original Poster:

25,155 posts

192 months

Tuesday 18th August 2015
quotequote all
In theory it makes some sense. It takes a rocket a hell of a lot of energy to fight gravity and drag and reach 20km (although they're going pretty quick by the time they get there), and they need a lot of excess thrust to carry the fuel needed to get there. White Knight released SpaceShip 1/2 at about 15km, and while that was about height rather than orbital velocities, launching from 20km stationary is probably more efficient than launching from 15km at a few hundred knots.

In practice it's not just one wave short of a shipwreck, it's missing the whole ocean and the boat!

A true space elevator would protrude out further than geostationary orbit (36,000km) so the whole things in tension, think they've got a way to go yet.

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Friday 21st August 2015
quotequote all
I posted this in the mars thread and only just spotted this one so here goes:

Yuri Artsutanov came up with the Space elevator which is now technically feasible each one could lift 1500 tonnes per annum

http://spaceref.com/space-elevator

Also you will find him here https://youtu.be/UK-q6f8SUCE

Couple of nice videos here showing how this would work http://www.spaceward.org/elevator


Edited by Toaster on Friday 21st August 21:39