Blue Origin - launch, seperation and vertical landing

Blue Origin - launch, seperation and vertical landing

Author
Discussion

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I wasn't talking about Blue Origin specifically or their economics. I assumed the question was a general one about how long it took to get a pad back into action again. I know back in the mid 1960s, NASA was able to get their Titan Pad back up and working within a couple of days after Gemini 6 failed to launch - even though the rocket engines had been running a for a few seconds and various pyrotechnic devices etc had fired.

Normally there is a gap of a few months between successive firings from a launch pad.

I wasn't for one moment assuming that Blue Origin would be making daily launches from one pad.
Thats where a step change in technology like Sabre would win

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Wednesday 25th November 2015
quotequote all
Absolutely.

But it's a while away yet. As I said earlier (although you tried to shoot me down on this), Sabre/Skylon does indeed need a lot more funding. I know they have received a boost recently but they could do with a lot more.

I'm sure it's where the genuine future of achieving orbit lies.

Maybe they should be trying to soft soap Elon Musk?

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Wednesday 25th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Absolutely.

But it's a while away yet. As I said earlier (although you tried to shoot me down on this), Sabre/Skylon does indeed need a lot more funding. I know they have received a boost recently but they could do with a lot more.

I'm sure it's where the genuine future of achieving orbit lies.

Maybe they should be trying to soft soap Elon Musk?
Soft soap Mr Musk ah you mean give more British tech to the Americans it would be nice to see we develop a technology rather then selling it short there is so much we have sold or given away in the past

tapkaJohnD

1,943 posts

204 months

Wednesday 25th November 2015
quotequote all
I'd rather be in the booster on landing than the capsule!
The second seemed to land a lot harder.

John

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Toaster said:
Soft soap Mr Musk ah you mean give more British tech to the Americans it would be nice to see we develop a technology rather then selling it short there is so much we have sold or given away in the past
It would be nice if Britain could go it alone in such a project - but it can't. Some of the money Bond has had already came from foreign sources (he told me this himself). He wouldn't, of course, reveal who these investors were.

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
tapkaJohnD said:
I'd rather be in the booster on landing than the capsule!
The second seemed to land a lot harder.

John
Does the capsule fire rockets at the last second to cushion the landing? The Soyuz capsule has used this type of system quite successfully for decades.

essayer

9,077 posts

194 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
65 years later, Professor Calculus' design finally implemented smile


Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
It would be nice if Britain could go it alone in such a project - but it can't. Some of the money Bond has had already came from foreign sources (he told me this himself). He wouldn't, of course, reveal who these investors were.


It's one thing having foreign investment and that investment does not mean IPR is given away, pension funds etc will invest in many projects but do not demand ownership of a technology but are interested in a return on any money invested. I suspect that BAE with its many investors would need an understanding of the intellectual capital and possibly some ownership of any more that comes with their money.


Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Presume away.

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Presume away.
Ah I see, but it was you that stated:

"At that time they were reluctant to reveal too much because it has since been disclosed by Bond that they ran into Official Secrets Act problems following their original British Aerospace involvement in HOTOL".

So if the technology is covered as you say by Official secrets, then any IPR that is shared would be restricted, which may or may not be foreign interests. Typically it would be limited to western organisations such as the European Space Agency and partners and possibly the americans. But that doesn't mean other countries can just use the technology.

So I'm not presuming as much as you may think...... smile

Just look at the make up of the board http://www.reactionengines.co.uk/about_management....

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Toaster said:
Ah I see, but it was you that stated:
So I'm not presuming as much as you may think...... smile
How do you know what I am thinking?

Are you a mind reader?

Are you presuming what I think as well?

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Toaster said:
Ah I see, but it was you that stated:
So I'm not presuming as much as you may think...... smile
How do you know what I am thinking?
I don't and have no desire to, but you did make the Official Secrets act statment therefore any company that has to abide by that is limited in who they can share information
Eric Mc said:
Are you a mind reader?
Its a dark art and someone has to do it
Eric Mc said:
Are you presuming what I think as well?
Well we all do this Eric its called communication, a person says something (transmitter) and the other person (Receiver) hears/sees what is said interprets it and responds.

I guess we are all guilty of presuming and mind reading it does make things far more exciting and interesting biggrin

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Does the capsule fire rockets at the last second to cushion the landing? The Soyuz capsule has used this type of system quite successfully for decades.
Good Guess Eric, although it still didn't look smooth

"A CLASSIC PARACHUTE LANDING
The crew capsule descends under parachutes for a smooth landing, in the same way as the earliest space pioneers. Three independent parachutes provide redundancy, while a retro-thrust system further cushions your landing."

https://www.blueorigin.com/technology

Toaster

2,939 posts

193 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
essayer said:
65 years later, Professor Calculus' design finally implemented smile
That rocket design is Sooooo cool I have one in my study biggrin alongside some working rockets I made......I will get my coat now

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
I've always liked this one -


MartG

20,683 posts

204 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
I've always liked this one -

Classic von Braun/Colliers smile

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Thursday 26th November 2015
quotequote all
When I was a kid, my local library had a book called "You Will Go to the Moon". It was aimed at young readers and the artwork was obviously heavily inspired by the Colliers articles. I loved it when I was 6 -


MartG

20,683 posts

204 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
Onboard video from the recent test flight

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNPpdHYD8jo&fe...

Note how the paint on the underside of the ring fin goes brown - I wonder if that's due to re-entry heating or engine exhaust deposits

Eric Mc

122,042 posts

265 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
What's the maximum speed it reaches before the braking rockets are fired? I wouldn't have expected aerodynamic heating would be high enough to char the paint.

IanCress

4,409 posts

166 months

Tuesday 10th May 2016
quotequote all
Wow, that doesn't half come down quickly.

Am I right in thinking that just after the start of the video it's 60 miles high, and at the 2 minute point it's virtually on the ground, therefore it has averaged 30 miles a minute, or 1800mph?