UFO Thread

Author
Discussion

dukeboy749r

2,728 posts

211 months

Monday 1st April
quotequote all
Fascinating.


zek

94 posts

159 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all

Fast and Spurious

1,350 posts

89 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Walob

zek

94 posts

159 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Fast and Spurious said:
Walob
Possibly, but fun to follow smile




Guvernator

13,172 posts

166 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Sigh, it's stupid crap like this that just muddies the water even more.

zek

94 posts

159 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Sigh, it's stupid crap like this that just muddies the water even more.
I get that looking at anatomy is beyond most peoples expertise, so I don't expect most to take this seriously, but i'm not sure a team of seemingly highly respected American medical professionals would have any interest at all in flying out to study them (unpaid) if this was the case?


RSTurboPaul

10,470 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Sigh, it's stupid crap like this that just muddies the water even more.
Without proper investigation, it will remain stupid crap that muddies the water.


My take from the articles posted was that journalists and scientists (seemingly of some standing) are both pushing for them to be fully investigated:

http://web.archive.org/web/20240405013948/https://...

marca website said:
During all this time, none of them have specified they believe these bodies are from a distant planet or extraterrestrial in nature. All they have been trying to do is give the alleged Nazca Mummies a proper chance of being investigated.
The bits and pieces posted on the other site look interesting (although the original items look like a sixth form art project someone I know did hehe ):



but I imagine that carbon dating would help confirm actual age of the objects and DNA analysis might yield some interesting results if they are not elaborate fakes.

tuscaneer

7,775 posts

226 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
" Pregnant without egg means the hybrid mated with a full human"

This sort of post on the YouTube video just about sums up the mindset of all the lunatics hoovering this st up

dukeboy749r

2,728 posts

211 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
I thought the 1st was over and done for this year?

skwdenyer

16,622 posts

241 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
Sigh, it's stupid crap like this that just muddies the water even more.
Scientifically speaking, why do you think this is “stupid crap”?

Guvernator

13,172 posts

166 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Scientifically speaking, why do you think this is “stupid crap”?
Because they will turn out to be fake.

RSTurboPaul

10,470 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
skwdenyer said:
Scientifically speaking, why do you think this is “stupid crap”?
Because they will turn out to be fake.
What 'should' alien bodies look like?

And what is the answer to the question above based on?

TGCOTF-dewey

5,249 posts

56 months

Saturday 6th April
quotequote all
RSTurboPaul said:
Guvernator said:
skwdenyer said:
Scientifically speaking, why do you think this is “stupid crap”?
Because they will turn out to be fake.
What 'should' alien bodies look like?

And what is the answer to the question above based on?
Black shiny beetly things with acid for blood... That mostly come out at night... Mostly.

I don't get the negativity towards this story.

If they're real... How cool and scary to not be alone in the universe.

If they're a fake... I've wasted 30 seconds reading about them. No big loss.



zek

94 posts

159 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlNjET011Q8&t

This is a brilliant, objective summary of why they are more likely real than not. It covers the common debunking arguments.

(it gets interesting from about 30 mins onwards).


Bill

52,920 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
Is there a summary of the summary?

juliussneezer

81 posts

3 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
Bill said:
Is there a summary of the summary?
Some of us could summarise it in one word for you I reckon. /

Guvernator

13,172 posts

166 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
juliussneezer said:
Bill said:
Is there a summary of the summary?
Some of us could summarise it in one word for you I reckon. /
hehe

Edited by Guvernator on Tuesday 9th April 21:46

skwdenyer

16,622 posts

241 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
Guvernator said:
skwdenyer said:
Scientifically speaking, why do you think this is “stupid crap”?
Because they will turn out to be fake.
Ah, gotcha, what mathematicians call “proof by assumption.” Personally I prefer the scientific method, but I get that pre-Copernican approaches still have their devotees.

juliussneezer

81 posts

3 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
He's not wrong though.

Guvernator

13,172 posts

166 months

Tuesday 9th April
quotequote all
skwdenyer said:
Ah, gotcha, what mathematicians call “proof by assumption.” Personally I prefer the scientific method, but I get that pre-Copernican approaches still have their devotees.
Hardly pre-Copernican considering the following.

1. Every single one of these previous so called finds has proven to be a hoax.

2. It seems very suspicious timing that someone has dug up "aliens" just as UFO fever is at it's highest it's been for decades.

3. The person who discovered the "aliens" has previous form for discovering aliens which later turned out to be fake.

Also since you mentioned it, the scientific method also dictates careful observation coupled with rigorous scepticism because cognitive functions can distort interpretation. That last part sounds a lot like what often happens in this thread. People interpret things the way they want because they want them to be true.

I'm an avid sci-fi reader and would love for us to find real aliens so I should be pre-disposed to lap this stuff up, however I'm also detached and sceptical enough to realise that is very very unlikely to actually happen.