MOT fail due to no BS mark on Plates

MOT fail due to no BS mark on Plates

Author
Discussion

John Laverick

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Really sorry for the confusion ….

Just picked the car up and the plates do have a BS stamp but use 3d style lettering which is apparently illegal [is this correct?]

Interestingly, they don’t have the Post Code [but they didn't mention that].

Maybe it would be easier to just get some new plates!!






Edited by John Laverick on Tuesday 9th June 11:34

Stickers

1,387 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
miniman said:
Stickers said:
Someone please explain to me how the average 'Joe Motorist' is expected to keep within the law, when firstly the information has to be paid for!
Agreed but, to be fair, it is mostly people who want non-standard plates who fall foul of the law. 'Joe Motorist' can simply take his docs into Hellfrauds and get a set of perfectly legal plates.
Ah yes, but the post made by the OP proves the exception & he has no way of varifying the information he has been told.

Unfortunately this information (although available) comes at a premium & the information itself is also supplied with legal limitations ie; the sharing of.

My comany manufactures specialist mobility products & the laws govering such are complex to say the least.......documents of which all have to be purchased along with their subsequent annexes/sub references.

My point being that all such information should be readily available, on request, by all - for free!

HellDiver

5,708 posts

182 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
I would have said those should pass, as they were likely the original plates on that car (assuming it's imported from N. Ireland). That type have been around here for years upon years.

Interestingly, my motor has dealer fitted plates (was registered new July 2008) and has no BS mark - in fact no markings at all, no postcode, no nothing. Looks like it's new plates time for MOT in a few years.

cazzer

8,883 posts

248 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Where do you guys all find these draconian bloody MOT testers?
My plates are metal, the wrong size and have embossed american sized font letters.
I pass my MOT.
Because my MOT tester stringently tests the stuff that matters, brakes, lights, indicators, suspension etc.
My number plate is legible and reflective, just cos it isn't easily machine readable.....tough.

I wouldn't cause any problem for him as I'd just take the hit for driving with my "Show Plates" on.

v15ben

15,795 posts

241 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
I purchased my plates from Fancy Plates in Northern Ireland and they don't have a postcode. They do however meet all the other legal spacing/font/size etc requirements so shirley they'll be legal won't they? yikessmile

Stickers

1,387 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
John - your plate is perfectly legal....your tester is applying laws that relate to vehicles first registered after 1st Sept' 2001.

Hyperion

15,232 posts

200 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
It is now your duty to PH to go back to the MOT station, and armed with a printout from the MOT testers manual (link posted on previous page) ask the MOT monkey exactly what the reason for rejection is!
I bet he's being super anal and will sight this reason...
does not have black characters on a yellow background as the lettering on your plate is grey in places.

John Laverick

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Stickers said:
John - your plate is perfectly legal....your tester is applying laws that relate to vehicles first registered after 1st Sept' 2001.
Any info I can print off and show him?

He said he's working to regulations issued in April this year?

Ponk

1,380 posts

192 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
On a completely unrelated note did you wave at a Blue S2 Rallye that was following you down the M1 on the bank holiday weekend?

Stickers

1,387 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
John Laverick said:
Stickers said:
John - your plate is perfectly legal....your tester is applying laws that relate to vehicles first registered after 1st Sept' 2001.
Any info I can print off and show him?

He said he's working to regulations issued in April this year?
Use the links that have been posted in this thread........or ask him to show you the relevant information!

John Laverick

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Ponk said:
On a completely unrelated note did you wave at a Blue S2 Rallye that was following you down the M1 on the bank holiday weekend?
Nope not me … although I did used to own a Blue S2 106 Rallye!

Hyperion

15,232 posts

200 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
John Laverick said:
He said he's working to regulations issued in April this year?
They only made a slight change to the test which was checking the background of the plate...

e. background overprinted or shadowed with text e.g. vehicle manufacturer name.
and.. c. any feature that has the effect of changing the appearance or legibility of any of the characters, so that the
true identity of the vehicle is less
easily established

They should have given you a reason for the failure - what was it?

John Laverick

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Hyperion said:
John Laverick said:
He said he's working to regulations issued in April this year?
They only made a slight change to the test which was checking the background of the plate...

e. background overprinted or shadowed with text e.g. vehicle manufacturer name.
and.. c. any feature that has the effect of changing the appearance or legibility of any of the characters, so that the
true identity of the vehicle is less
easily established

They should have given you a reason for the failure - what was it?
Front Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c]

Rear Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c]

Which he specifically stated was due to the 3d lettering, a little over zealous by the sounds of things!! I’ll have a chat with him and see what he says!

LuS1fer

41,135 posts

245 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
The 3D plates are in fact, legal. I've looked into it before.

http://www.craigsplates.com/

Roo

11,503 posts

207 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
The 3D plates are in fact, legal. I've looked into it before.

http://www.craigsplates.com/
As Wayne says, 3D letters are legal on any car. The 2001 date for other markings has no effect on 3D lettering on any age car. These, the flag/logo and border are the only things you can 'personalise'.

Stickers

1,387 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
John Laverick]Front Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c said:
Rear Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c]

Which he specifically stated was due to the 3d lettering, a little over zealous by the sounds of things!! I’ll have a chat with him and see what he says!
From the book: 6.3.4c = "any feature that has the effect of changing the appearance or legibility of any of the characters, so that the true identity of the vehicle is less easily established"

http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_630.htm


John Laverick

Original Poster:

1,992 posts

214 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Stickers said:
John Laverick]Front Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c said:
Rear Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c]

Which he specifically stated was due to the 3d lettering, a little over zealous by the sounds of things!! I’ll have a chat with him and see what he says!
From the book: 6.3.4c = "any feature that has the effect of changing the appearance or legibility of any of the characters, so that the true identity of the vehicle is less easily established"

http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_630.htm
Yep ... which I don't think it's fair to see my 3d lettering does!

Targarama

14,635 posts

283 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
I just bought a car with a fresh MOT (privately, so it wasn't the dealer ignoring this). It has 'shadow' text and no BS marks on the plates.

Stickers

1,387 posts

199 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
John Laverick said:
Stickers said:
John Laverick]Front Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c said:
Rear Registration plate has a feature which changes the appearance or legibility of the characters [6.3.4c]

Which he specifically stated was due to the 3d lettering, a little over zealous by the sounds of things!! I’ll have a chat with him and see what he says!
From the book: 6.3.4c = "any feature that has the effect of changing the appearance or legibility of any of the characters, so that the true identity of the vehicle is less easily established"

http://www.motuk.co.uk/manual_630.htm
Yep ... which I don't think it's fair to see my 3d lettering does!
John - Just change the plates............then pull down your pants, bend down with your arse up in front of the guy at the MOT station and ask "Please sir can I have another"

Pints

18,444 posts

194 months

Tuesday 9th June 2009
quotequote all
Will be waiting on the outcome of this, since I've been looking at possibly getting a set of new plates to go with a new reg. If MOT stations are going to start having issues with legal (AFAIK) 3D numbering then to hell with it.

I've had it up to my ears with MOT stations taking the Mick with piddy excuses to fail just so they can make an extra couple of quid from you.

Over. A. Barrel.
Barstewards indeed.