Is Vettel overrated?

Is Vettel overrated?

Poll: Is Vettel overrated?

Total Members Polled: 458

Yes: 41%
No: 23%
Apparently!: 7%
Too early to tell: 18%
STFU "hater"!: 4%
Ricciardo is really just that good: 7%
Author
Discussion

slipstream 1985

12,220 posts

179 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.

SuperDude

2,348 posts

122 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Good comment.

And I'm sure he'll lose sleep over that, which is what he deserves for being such a terrible professional racing driver.

Breath through your nose, son.

Juanco20

3,214 posts

193 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Yes

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Starting to get some mirror action.

Nice phrase

slipstream 1985

12,220 posts

179 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SuperDude said:
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Good comment.

And I'm sure he'll lose sleep over that, which is what he deserves for being such a terrible professional racing driver.

Breath through your nose, son.
calling someone son. trying to make yourself sound like "the man". facts are facts in the best car he couldn't consistantly take second place.

edited to add. 3rd 3rd 6th 3rd the last 4 years championship finishing positions. teammate those years

1st 1st 1st 1sr

Edited by slipstream 1985 on Sunday 20th April 09:40

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

219 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SuperDude said:
Breath through your nose, son.
rolleyes

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Not the most exciting race but a curate's egg.

Shame about how dominant Lewis was but otherwise quite interesting.

I feel that tyre temperature may have helped Ferrari but we'll know better next time.


Joffery666

305 posts

130 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SuperDude said:
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Good comment.

And I'm sure he'll lose sleep over that, which is what he deserves for being such a terrible professional racing driver.

Breath through your nose, son.
Get a grip... Son, facts are facts.

Derek Smith

45,660 posts

248 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Rosberg not happy, but then he wouldn't be.

MG511

1,754 posts

241 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Webber was not a 'great' driver IMHO, underperformed in a very dominant car. Vettel is looking very ordinary, and a total brat, this season so far, be interesting to see what happens over the full season.

leglessAlex

5,450 posts

141 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Would Red Bull really have kept him on if he wasn't that good? I know they didn't want anyone to push Vettel too much but at the same time I imagine they wanted someone who was good enough to give them the constructors championship.

I think it's more likely that Mark just didn't like the car design, it's not exactly unknown that all the drivers have their preferred setup and if Mark couldn't get on with a car designed around Vettel then there wouldn't have been much he could have done about it.

Let us not forget that Mark still had 9 wins and 13 poles, so it's not as if he was a bad driver! Just probably not quite as consistent or as suited to the car as Vettel was.

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
I think the #2 driver status got to Webber. Ricciardo has put down his marker early in his RB career.

SuperDude

2,348 posts

122 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
slipstream 1985 said:
SuperDude said:
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Good comment.

And I'm sure he'll lose sleep over that, which is what he deserves for being such a terrible professional racing driver.

Breath through your nose, son.
calling someone son. trying to make yourself sound like "the man". facts are facts in the best car he couldn't consistantly take second place.

edited to add. 3rd 3rd 6th 3rd the last 4 years championship finishing positions. teammate those years

1st 1st 1st 1sr

Edited by slipstream 1985 on Sunday 20th April 09:40
Such glib dismissal of a top flight world class racing driver can only be met one way (if not totally ignored, which I should have done)

Mark Webber was one of the most respected racing drivers on that grid. He fought hard and fair, and was lightning fast. His failing during the latter parts of his F1 career were down to Vettel having lightning one lap pace, plus the backing of the entire team. The overtakes and accidents he was involved in were, frankly, breath taking at times. I'm talking his move on Alonso at Spa, or the times he's flipped his car at high speed - and yet he consistantly(sic) got back in and gave it everything. Even, at one stage, with a broken leg.

You don't rate him as a driver? Fine. You do that. Meanwhile the rest of us will appreciate that racing, at any level, does not begin and end with the driver. There's more to it. Mark Webber didn't get the job done, we all know this, but tell me you don't rate him, that just says more about your appreciation of the sport than it does of the driver.

IainT

10,040 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel...

Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.

mattikake

Original Poster:

5,057 posts

199 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
IainT said:
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel...

Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons. Neither driver has suggested either.

The job of a driver is to get the max out of the machinery regardless of the machinery. If they can't do this, then it only serves to highlight further failings, not viable excuses.

OTOH Maybe this tosh explains why Vettel could only manage a 1:44.0 in the downforceless reasonably priced car and Lewis could do a 1:42.9? wink

RichB

51,572 posts

284 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
mattikake said:
IainT said:
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel... Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons. Neither driver has suggested either. The job of a driver is to get the max out of the machinery regardless of the machinery. If they can't do this, then it only serves to highlight further failings, not viable excuses. OTOH Maybe this tosh explains why Vettel could only manage a 1:44.0 in the downforceless reasonably priced car and Lewis could do a 1:42.9? wink
Indeed, used to be drivers like Jim Clark and Graham Hill would win in an F1 car, cross the Atlantic to win in an Indy car then jump into a Lotus Cortina or an E-Type Jag and win in that too. Clearly exceptional racing drivers should be able to perform in any decent car but in these days of sanitised racing we'll never know.

IainT

10,040 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
mattikake said:
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons. Neither driver has suggested either.
Other than Seb in his post-race interview today!

SmoothCriminal

5,059 posts

199 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Just another Button only thing is his car advantage lasted 4 years instead of 1.

Sparks of brilliance in the right conditions but day in day out racer with a questionable car no.

/in before you're not a 4 time wdc, f1 driver etc etc.

blasos

344 posts

162 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
mattikake said:
IainT said:
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel...

Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons.
I agree with mattiake. IainT, you're just parroting what you heard today on Sky Sports. If that were the case, Chilton would be one of the top two drivers on the grid.

stephen300o

15,464 posts

228 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SuperDude said:
slipstream 1985 said:
SuperDude said:
slipstream 1985 said:
stephen300o said:
Maybe Mark wasn't that great.
couldn't even come second in a dominant car. I dont rate him either.
Good comment.

And I'm sure he'll lose sleep over that, which is what he deserves for being such a terrible professional racing driver.

Breath through your nose, son.
calling someone son. trying to make yourself sound like "the man". facts are facts in the best car he couldn't consistantly take second place.

edited to add. 3rd 3rd 6th 3rd the last 4 years championship finishing positions. teammate those years

1st 1st 1st 1sr

Edited by slipstream 1985 on Sunday 20th April 09:40
Such glib dismissal of a top flight world class racing driver can only be met one way (if not totally ignored, which I should have done)

Mark Webber was one of the most respected racing drivers on that grid. He fought hard and fair, and was lightning fast. His failing during the latter parts of his F1 career were down to Vettel having lightning one lap pace, plus the backing of the entire team. The overtakes and accidents he was involved in were, frankly, breath taking at times. I'm talking his move on Alonso at Spa, or the times he's flipped his car at high speed - and yet he consistantly(sic) got back in and gave it everything. Even, at one stage, with a broken leg.

You don't rate him as a driver? Fine. You do that. Meanwhile the rest of us will appreciate that racing, at any level, does not begin and end with the driver. There's more to it. Mark Webber didn't get the job done, we all know this, but tell me you don't rate him, that just says more about your appreciation of the sport than it does of the driver.
Above there it says 'formula 1 forum', to discuss formula 1, there will be opinions, some you agree with some you don't.
Some of us feel Seb has been a bit flattered by Mark's lack of desire/speed, that maybe another driver would have given him more of a run for his money.
But yes of course every driver on the grid is pretty darn good.