Is Vettel overrated?

Is Vettel overrated?

Poll: Is Vettel overrated?

Total Members Polled: 458

Yes: 41%
No: 23%
Apparently!: 7%
Too early to tell: 18%
STFU "hater"!: 4%
Ricciardo is really just that good: 7%
Author
Discussion

SlipStream77

2,153 posts

191 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SuperDude said:
Such glib dismissal of a top flight world class racing driver can only be met one way (if not totally ignored, which I should have done)

Mark Webber was one of the most respected racing drivers on that grid. He fought hard and fair, and was lightning fast. His failing during the latter parts of his F1 career were down to Vettel having lightning one lap pace, plus the backing of the entire team. The overtakes and accidents he was involved in were, frankly, breath taking at times. I'm talking his move on Alonso at Spa, or the times he's flipped his car at high speed - and yet he consistantly(sic) got back in and gave it everything. Even, at one stage, with a broken leg.

You don't rate him as a driver? Fine. You do that. Meanwhile the rest of us will appreciate that racing, at any level, does not begin and end with the driver. There's more to it. Mark Webber didn't get the job done, we all know this, but tell me you don't rate him, that just says more about your appreciation of the sport than it does of the driver.
+1

IainT

10,040 posts

238 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
blasos said:
you're just parroting
Does it come naturally or do you have to work at it?

stephen300o

15,464 posts

228 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
SlipStream77 said:
SuperDude said:
Such glib dismissal of a top flight world class racing driver can only be met one way (if not totally ignored, which I should have done)

Mark Webber was one of the most respected racing drivers on that grid. He fought hard and fair, and was lightning fast. His failing during the latter parts of his F1 career were down to Vettel having lightning one lap pace, plus the backing of the entire team. The overtakes and accidents he was involved in were, frankly, breath taking at times. I'm talking his move on Alonso at Spa, or the times he's flipped his car at high speed - and yet he consistantly(sic) got back in and gave it everything. Even, at one stage, with a broken leg.

You don't rate him as a driver? Fine. You do that. Meanwhile the rest of us will appreciate that racing, at any level, does not begin and end with the driver. There's more to it. Mark Webber didn't get the job done, we all know this, but tell me you don't rate him, that just says more about your appreciation of the sport than it does of the driver.
+1
You read his dismissal of multi championship winner Vettel right?

SuperDude

2,348 posts

122 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
stephen300o said:
You read his dismissal of multi championship winner Vettel right?
No dismissal. The lad has talent (as I've actually said above) But I believe there are other drives on that grid more deserving of four world titles.

Crafty_

13,289 posts

200 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Was pondering this earlier whilst watching a bit of WEC.

How would Mark get on in the 2014 cars ?

Would he have one over Vettel regularly ?

kambites

67,576 posts

221 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
I think people have too much tendency to assume that a driver being better in one car will mean they're better in another. I'm not saying this is necessarily the case, but it would be quite possible that Vettel was genuinely the best driver on the grid in the old V8 powered cars and isn't even in the top five in the new cars simply due to personal preference in how the cars drive.

Joffery666

305 posts

130 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
kambites said:
I think people have too much tendency to assume that a driver being better in one car will mean they're better in another. I'm not saying this is necessarily the case, but it would be quite possible that Vettel was genuinely the best driver on the grid in the old V8 powered cars and isn't even in the top five in the new cars simply due to personal preference in how the cars drive.
Bottom line....

His a 4 TIMES WORLD CHAMP.
He SHOULD be able to adjust and get the best out of a mini metro if need be.... (others like alonso/Lewis can) BUT he can't, hence why everyone's questioning his abilities.



Edited by Joffery666 on Sunday 20th April 20:54

S0 What

3,358 posts

172 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
blasos said:
mattikake said:
IainT said:
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel...

Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons.
I agree with mattiake. IainT, you're just parroting what you heard today on Sky Sports. If that were the case, Chilton would be one of the top two drivers on the grid.
Except SV agreed that the lack of downforce and his lack of ability to get used to it was his main problem this year ?

Bradgate

2,823 posts

147 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Is a four-time World Champion overrated? By definition, no. Vettel stands alongside other multiple World Champions as one of the finest drivers in the history of F1.

He has, however, hit a bump in the road this season largely due to the removal of exhaust-blown aerodynamics. Over a 4 year period, he adapted his driving style and worked with Red Bull's engineers to exploit this technology better than anyone else. That's what great champions have always done.

Now the exhaust-blowing has gone, so he has to change his technique again to compensate. Can he figure it out, adapt and beat his new team-mate? We'll see, but it would take a brave man to bet against him.




MGJohn

10,203 posts

183 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
RichB said:
.... Clearly exceptional racing drivers should be able to perform in any decent car but in these days of sanitised racing we'll never know.
.
Good grief! Salient comment on a PH F1 thread ... wink

SALIENT CONTENT 100%

Very amusing how all the naysayers are already eagerly seeking to justify their stance ... after all of four races. Case proven apparently ... rofl

PSSSSST! My favourite driver is better than your'n. wink

DHB07

80 posts

121 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
Here's the situation.

Alonso is fantastic: He's been alongside plenty of other top notch drivers, and shown them his heels. People rate Bottas (Frank Williams very much so, and he's managed a few good drivers), and yet alongside Massa they're pretty evenly matched.
Massa was schooled time and again by Alonso.

Hamilton is fantastic: Even Alonso will say so now having raced alongside him. He had more pace than Button (despite scoring less points) who showed Barichello a thing or two. Who generally kept Schumi honest.

Vettel is a totally unknown quantity: He pulled a Toro Rosso over the line in first place in Monza, but was lapping only marginally quicker than his teammate (can't even remember who now, but it wasn't anyone particularly quick and they reckon it would have been a 1-2 without said teammate's issues).

He's been side by side a handful of OK drivers, none of whom have been particularly rated. Webber, as reliable, mature and respected as he was, was never regarded as one of the greats (probably not even top five on the grid at any given time.)

And now DR is showing him how to drive. I'm not wanting to take anything away from Riciardo, but he was pretty well matched previously. This isn't to say that the past four races are truly representative of DR and SV's respective talents but surely Seb would be a little closer if he really was that good?!

So the problem is that we'll never really know Vettel's true pace until he goes alongside a known quantity. I don't think RB or SV will opt to let this happen. I don't doubt Seb's commitment, or his attitude and desire to understand the car. But this season is certainly making me start to doubt his talent.






Edited by DHB07 on Sunday 20th April 22:21

DHB07

80 posts

121 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
leglessAlex said:
Would Red Bull really have kept him on if he wasn't that good?
In follow up to my above post, the issue is that no-one, including RB, really know how good he is. They just know he's been quicker than his mediocre teammates and that his telemetry including throttle dump and pickup has been better than his teammates' too. He's a known quantity to them. He brings publicity and speaks their language. And he's helped bring them 4 world titles. Horner and Marko adore him.

They have no reason to let him go.

Personally, I think he's going to struggle to get a drive anywhere else after RB.


leglessAlex

5,459 posts

141 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
DHB07 said:
leglessAlex said:
Would Red Bull really have kept him on if he wasn't that good?
In follow up to my above post, the issue is that no-one, including RB, really know how good he is. They just know he's been quicker than his mediocre teammates and that his telemetry including throttle dump and pickup has been better than his teammates' too. He's a known quantity to them. He brings publicity and speaks their language. And he's helped bring them 4 world titles. Horner and Marko adore him.

They have no reason to let him go.

Personally, I think he's going to struggle to get a drive anywhere else after RB.
In my post I was referring to Mark, not Seb. While I agree Mark was probably not a top three driver and maybe not even a top five driver, but if he was really as mediocre as some are suggesting then I would have thought RB would have replaced him with someone else. After all, RB are in it to win it, they would have no place for a mediocre driver.

davepoth

29,395 posts

199 months

Sunday 20th April 2014
quotequote all
It's an interesting parallel. It was said that Webber had difficulty adjusting to the way the RBR car drove during the championship years - getting on the throttle stupid early on account of it vacuuming itself to the road and just letting it get on with things was a bit counter-intuitive. It now seems that Vettel is having trouble adjusting to the way that the new cars need to be driven; there's a lot more torque low-down which means the cars get squirrelly, which is the complete opposite of what he had last year.

It's the mark of a truly great driver that they can get good performances out of cars they don't like - of the current drivers I think you can only really put Alonso and Hamilton in that box.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
that just about summs it up for me too...

Not suggesting he's a crap driver, but I also do not think he is the best out there.

he maybe one of the most ruthless (not sure about that either) but in terms of ultimate car control, he's not the best by some way.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
davepoth said:
of the current drivers I think you can only really put Alonso and Hamilton in that box.
I would tend to agree. As a pure talent, I'd wager these two are about the best.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

247 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
Vettel is good. Very good.

But he has never been as good as some say he is. He has enjoyed a perfect combination of car and team, optimised to suit him. That in itself is quite an achievement, but it reminds us that these guys are simply jockeys and there are a lot of complex components in play to ensure success.

Change is a great leveller. It reveals the truth. And the truth is that Vettel is a very, very good driver.

Hamilton is similar in some respects to Vettel, although perhaps even more extreme in terms of his ability to be leaps and bounds ahead, given the right car.

The most impressive drivers for me are those that get decent results even when the car isn't right. You have to hand it to Alonso in that respect. I'm not really a fan, but you have to respect his abilities. Alonso has been very impressive. I think Hulkenberg has similar qualities.

Megaflow

9,420 posts

225 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
mattikake said:
IainT said:
Interesting discussion around why Seb is being outperformed by Daniel...

Looks like Seb's struggling to get to grips with the lower down-force this year but Daniel is more used to the lack and has adjusted better. That might account for some of the difference today but it looked like DR was substantially faster for the bulk of the race.
IMO this is a kop-out being spouted by the pundits to excuse their over-zealous loving of him in recent seasons. Neither driver has suggested either.

The job of a driver is to get the max out of the machinery regardless of the machinery. If they can't do this, then it only serves to highlight further failings, not viable excuses.

OTOH Maybe this tosh explains why Vettel could only manage a 1:44.0 in the downforceless reasonably priced car and Lewis could do a 1:42.9? wink
I think the commentators are close to the mark, but it is not the level of downforce that's the issue, it's the lack of exhaust blown diffuser. Vettel's style seems to suit a blown diffuser, attempts to remove the blown diffuser reduced his apparent advantage to an extent before they got their head around it again and got it working, then he was back to dominance.

He is suffering from the lack of that blown diffuser IMO.

Fire99

9,844 posts

229 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
toppstuff said:
The most impressive drivers for me are those that get decent results even when the car isn't right. You have to hand it to Alonso in that respect.
I agree with that. Alonso has managed some very good results with a very mediocre car.

Chipmunk1

1,314 posts

162 months

Monday 21st April 2014
quotequote all
This race has shown one thing that has been argued over and over again on here, that is how the two best drivers in world get things done, hats of to Hamilton and Alonso