F1 engine note - Why all the haters?

F1 engine note - Why all the haters?

Author
Discussion

CraigyMc

16,476 posts

237 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
I love the sound!

OK to many it will sound like a monotonous grunting sound but if you listen closely there is some amazing turbo spool, wastegate chatter and antilag

What's wrong with that lot?
It sounds like st compared to a 19000-20000rpm V10 circa 2004. It's also quieter - F1 cars should be borderline painful to hear, and your organs should feel the noise as well as your ears hearing it.

The difficulty with the ERS-H (turbo-regen machine) is that it removes energy from the exhaust which would otherwise be noise. The cars are too quiet, and the noise they make isn't racy enough.

If you compare F1 today with a NASCAR, the stock car sounds much better. Shocking state of affairs.

crostonian

2,427 posts

173 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
lbc said:
crostonian said:
Because they sound like a wet fart.
The engines sound really great. biggrin

Not just a horrible wasp noise as before.
Wasps sound better than farts sorry

CharlesAL

532 posts

125 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
I really don't see the problem and I can't wait to be at Silverstone. They sound very different, but I still like the sound and the cars are more exciting to watch too.

And I might finally see my favourite driver win.

Mr2Mike

20,143 posts

256 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
I love the sound!

OK to many it will sound like a monotonous grunting sound but if you listen closely there is some amazing turbo spool, wastegate chatter and antilag

What's wrong with that lot?
Why would I want to listen closely to hear wastegate chatter over the top of the monotonous grunting? I want to be aurally assaulted by a howling V10/12.

Maybe it makes less difference if you are sitting on your sofa watching the TV, but when watching the race from the side of the track the sound has always been one of the outstanding experiences of F1.

MG CHRIS

9,091 posts

168 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
I went to the brit gp back in 2005 with the v10 was amazing as a 12 year old kid the noise nothing ive heard before. This year a btcc car sounds better im my opinion.

0000

13,812 posts

192 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
The only thing worse than hearing the engine notes of the 2014 cars would be if they fake them. I'd rather keep it as it is than that.

lord trumpton

Original Poster:

7,459 posts

127 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
Mr2Mike said:
lord trumpton said:
I love the sound!

OK to many it will sound like a monotonous grunting sound but if you listen closely there is some amazing turbo spool, wastegate chatter and antilag

What's wrong with that lot?
Why would I want to listen closely to hear wastegate chatter over the top of the monotonous grunting? I want to be aurally assaulted by a howling V10/12.

Maybe it makes less difference if you are sitting on your sofa watching the TV, but when watching the race from the side of the track the sound has always been one of the outstanding experiences of F1.
Well I like it and as I'm the Original Poster and this is my thread it makes me right and you wrong. Capiche?

longshot

3,286 posts

199 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
0000 said:
The only thing worse than hearing the engine notes of the 2014 cars would be if they fake them. I'd rather keep it as it is than that.
You know, I hope they do that.

In the act of doing it, it may finally twig what a situation they have allowed themselves to be put in.

longshot

3,286 posts

199 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
lord trumpton said:
Well I like it and as I'm the Original Poster and this is my thread it makes me right and you wrong. Capiche?
Elvis did a song about that.

Ohno, that was hot banana.

Sleepy nic

207 posts

175 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
0000 said:
The only thing worse than hearing the engine notes of the 2014 cars would be if they fake them. I'd rather keep it as it is than that.
I was all for them making it louder somehow until i saw this was the solution.



No ta.

jonnM

1,102 posts

140 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
crostonian said:
lbc said:
crostonian said:
Because they sound like a wet fart.
The engines sound really great. biggrin

Not just a horrible wasp noise as before.
Wasps sound better than farts sorry
Especially V10 wasps smile

Stick Legs

5,028 posts

166 months

Monday 26th May 2014
quotequote all
I think F1 engines should be the pinnacle of motor vehicle engineering. Something you will see on the road in the next 20 years, like 4 valves per cylinder, variable valve lift and timing, and high specific power output and true fuel efficiency (not economy). The current F1 cars are doing this with V6 turbo's and regen systems.

HOWEVER for noise & spectacle I would have a Formula 5000 running any configuartion you like providing it is 5 litres and a max rev limit of 9000 oucght to do it.
That would sound awesome, imagine V12 Ferrari's racing V8 AMG mercs and V8 Twin Turbo BMW's. Oh and have a mental left field British entry, like an H16 (two boxer 8's on a common crank). Audi could always rock up with a W16...

I would pay to go to that...

Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Fantuzzi said:
Because European racing engines have always been epitomized by a high pitched sound, and F1 engines are often seen as the peak of this.

N
Always?

CraigyMc

16,476 posts

237 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
Eric Mc said:
Fantuzzi said:
Because European racing engines have always been epitomized by a high pitched sound, and F1 engines are often seen as the peak of this.

N
Always?
This is somewhat hilarious if anyone's ever seen things like the Brooklands-era cars that revved to a heady 2500rpm - these sound like thunder.
Fantuzzi also seems to be ignoring the fact that many of the cars in American racing were from Europe (McLaren in Can-Am, Lola or Reynard in Indycar?)

Edited by CraigyMc on Tuesday 27th May 09:13

RemarkLima

2,383 posts

213 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
My uncle went to Barcelona, he's a mahussive F1 fan, been following it all his life and was sadly disappointed with the noise... He appreciated that you could hold a conversation and wasn't deaf by the end of the race but said it just sounded like a Formula Ford race, noisy but a bit piddly.

R1 Indy

4,383 posts

184 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
I have had the benefit of hearing them at Monaco

My opinion is the actual sound is good when they are gunning it, and all the turbo noises etc. but when they are cruising it does sound like a wet fart.

Noise wise, I don't think they were much quieter than the GP2's.
But didn't get the chance to hear a V8etc to compare to.

But definatly didn't need plugs. But it was loud enough to hear them around the track

Eric Mc

122,140 posts

266 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
CraigyMc said:
This is somewhat hilarious if anyone's ever seen things like the Brooklands-era cars that revved to a heady 2500rpm - these sound like thunder.
Fantuzzi also seems to be ignoring the fact that many of the cars in American racing were from Europe (McLaren in Can-Am, Lola or Reynard in Indycar?)

Edited by CraigyMc on Tuesday 27th May 09:13
Although Brooklands car weren't normally built to the GP specs of that era.

However, if you look at genuine GP cars going right back to 1906 (when GP racing actually started), many of them were definitely not "screamers". Early engines were slow revving "thumpers" featuring large bore and long stroke.
By the 1930s the revs had gone up but they were still not screamers - more like "raspers" (listen to a 1930s Mercedes or Auto Union).

I think the first true screaming F1 engine was the hopeless BRM V16 which failed miserably as an effective power plant. Most 1950s F1 engines revved under 10,000 rpm. I love the growl of the 1954/55 Mercedes Straight 6.

The next true screamers were the little 1.5 litre Honda V12 fited to their cars in 1965/65.
Even the Ford DFV Cosworth V8 was not that much of a screamer. The seminal book on the engine is called "Such Sweet Thunder" - not "Such Sweet Screamer".
The nearest we got to true screamers in those days were the Flat 12s and V12s used by teams such as Ferrari or Matra.

True screaming F1 engines finally emerged in the 1990s when pneumatic and hydraulic valve technology allowed rev limits way beyond what could be achieved with spring actuated valves.

CraigyMc

16,476 posts

237 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Ferrari would have left F1 if they did this. VW Group were rumoured to be entering F1 if it moved to an inline 4.

rdjohn

6,229 posts

196 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
On Thursday, I watched FP2 on my laptop and listened with decent headphones.

I have to say that the sound was much improved by that, and you can hear so much more detail noise from the tyres. Seamless gear changes are what differentiate top end race cars from older, or more ordinary stuff, if you saw the clip of DH driving the turbo Renault, the sound was not massively different, just the volume.

The cars now look more difficult to drive, having the back end step out next to the Armco must be a butt clenching moment.

I would have preferred that they had not changed, but overall, I think the show has been improved.

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Tuesday 27th May 2014
quotequote all
I like the new cars a lot more than the old V8's.

They sound fine to me when I was at the Spanish GP.

And I like the fact that the extra torque from the leccy motors and the lack of blown diffusers makes the cars much more of a handful.

The TV coverage is affected because the TV companies seem to be rubbish at properly capturing the sound, however.

Overall though, I am very happy with the new cars.