Is Ron correct?
Discussion
ralphrj said:
ash73 said:
Brawn won the championship with a customer engine bolted in the back, literally as an afterthought. What is RD going on about?
The original post was missing a key bit of information - RD's comments were in relation to the current hybrid engines.ralphrj said:
ash73 said:
Brawn won the championship with a customer engine bolted in the back, literally as an afterthought. What is RD going on about?
The original post was missing a key bit of information - RD's comments were in relation to the current hybrid engines.AndStilliRise said:
arcturus said:
Could it be that Mercedes have not given McLaren all the information they need knowing that they would be changing to Honda in 2015? If I was a Mercedes head honcho, I would be concerned about giving McLaren too much information in such circumstances.
Could have something there... The key issue is source code. If customer engines are not running the same source code as Mercedes run in their own cars then something is seriously wrong and is In breach of FIA rules.
Despite their considerable resources, McLaren seem to be loosing compared to other Mercedes customers.
It would have been wrong if the standard McLaren Electronics ECU source code was unknown to every customer other than The Mclaren F1 garage, but I struggle to believe that the FIA would have been unaware, if this were the case
It seems odd that Mercedes have chosen not to refute Ron's assertion.
In 2016, Honda may supply other customer teams. This issue needs to be nipped-in-the-bud,. And Soon.
rdjohn said:
If this is the case, then the FIA need to urgently step in as they required equality between all engines and systems supplied to customers.
The key issue is source code. If customer engines are not running the same source code as Mercedes run in their own cars then something is seriously wrong and is In breach of FIA rules.
Despite their considerable resources, McLaren seem to be loosing compared to other Mercedes customers.
It would have been wrong if the standard McLaren Electronics ECU source code was unknown to every customer other than The Mclaren F1 garage, but I struggle to believe that the FIA would have been unaware, if this were the case
It seems odd that Mercedes have chosen not to refute Ron's assertion.
In 2016, Honda may supply other customer teams. This issue needs to be nipped-in-the-bud,. And Soon.
Look at this FIA Technical Report from Saturday on Russia. On page 4 it says that all teams were using the version SR643 ECU firmware.The key issue is source code. If customer engines are not running the same source code as Mercedes run in their own cars then something is seriously wrong and is In breach of FIA rules.
Despite their considerable resources, McLaren seem to be loosing compared to other Mercedes customers.
It would have been wrong if the standard McLaren Electronics ECU source code was unknown to every customer other than The Mclaren F1 garage, but I struggle to believe that the FIA would have been unaware, if this were the case
It seems odd that Mercedes have chosen not to refute Ron's assertion.
In 2016, Honda may supply other customer teams. This issue needs to be nipped-in-the-bud,. And Soon.
http://www.fia.com/sites/default/files/championshi...
I am 100% sure that Ron's "source code" quote is inaccurate terminology but he is in fact talking about is the mapping of the engine which is separate and thus perhaps for whatever reason Mercedes are not giving McLaren the latest specification mapping.
Just read the article in its complete context.
You have to remember Ron has a habit of speaking bolloks AKA Ron-speak and most likely wouldn't call a spade a spade.
I think "source code" was meant to be an analogy rather than literal statement of fact because he was making the point that being being a customer teams don't win titles.
Source code = benefitting from factory support and I would imagine an example of this would be of RBR/Renault/off-throttle blown exhausts. Funnily enough Helmut Marko recently claimed RBR are Renault customer team and Lotus is the factory; Renault claim they favour no one - Benetton won with Renault when Williams was regarded as the factory team.
You have to remember Ron has a habit of speaking bolloks AKA Ron-speak and most likely wouldn't call a spade a spade.
I think "source code" was meant to be an analogy rather than literal statement of fact because he was making the point that being being a customer teams don't win titles.
Source code = benefitting from factory support and I would imagine an example of this would be of RBR/Renault/off-throttle blown exhausts. Funnily enough Helmut Marko recently claimed RBR are Renault customer team and Lotus is the factory; Renault claim they favour no one - Benetton won with Renault when Williams was regarded as the factory team.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff