****Winter Testing #1 Jerez****

****Winter Testing #1 Jerez****

Author
Discussion

andyps

7,817 posts

282 months

Sunday 1st February 2015
quotequote all
rallycross said:
Honda shocker 2nd attempt on track and still not getting anywhere, surely they could have got the thing going before they arrived at the circuit? Does not bode well for them, a bit like Renault last season not getting on top of the rules.
I'm sure they got it going but the testing restrictions mean that they couldn't really run it in anything resembling track conditions. At least they managed more laps today than Red Bull did on day one last year!

Some Gump

12,687 posts

186 months

Sunday 1st February 2015
quotequote all
rallycross said:
Honda shocker 2nd attempt on track and still not getting anywhere, surely they could have got the thing going before they arrived at the circuit? Does not bode well for them, a bit like Renault last season not getting on top of the rules.
Too early to say. Obviously it's far from ideal, but Red Bull still came second last year, didn't they? In effect they are the de facto Renault works partner, so no different for Ron's mob.

London424

12,828 posts

175 months

Sunday 1st February 2015
quotequote all
Some Gump said:
Too early to say. Obviously it's far from ideal, but Red Bull still came second last year, didn't they? In effect they are the de facto Renault works partner, so no different for Ron's mob.
But they had 4 years on the spin with the best aero/chasis on the grid.

Some Gump

12,687 posts

186 months

Sunday 1st February 2015
quotequote all
Hi comment was re "honda's shocker" - I was saying don't write them off yet, is all =)

lbc

3,215 posts

217 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
The cars seem too noisy this year.

Last years quieter engines were better.

I suppose we will have to get used to it.

lbc

3,215 posts

217 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
el stovey said:
1:24.00 From Vettel. 3d fastest.
Vettel cheating already...driving in 3D. biggrin

andburg

7,273 posts

169 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Whats interesting me so far engine wise....

Honda - apparently the engines aren't the actual engines that will be used, not sure of the relevance but the issues they are seeing may not exist on the homologation spec.

Mercedes - claim not to have spent any of their tokens, does this mean they are currently running the 2014 spec ICE? if they are then the speed of that mercedes is even more astounding and could get even faster

Ferrari - Seems strange to see Sauber so far up the timesheets with the Ferrari engine too, have they managed to locate a big jump in HP compared to Renault?

Smollet

10,535 posts

190 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
After just one day's testing the only thing that's indisputable is that Mercedes did more laps than anyone else. Everything else is pure peculation of what may happen.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
andburg said:
Mercedes - claim not to have spent any of their tokens, does this mean they are currently running the 2014 spec ICE? if they are then the speed of that mercedes is even more astounding and could get even faster
not sure that can be taken at face value?

they may well be running the same ICE, but no way would they not have taken the opportunity to change out the electronics etc. it's not like they did not have significant failures last year that they will have wanted to address.


suffolk009

5,373 posts

165 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Smollet said:
After just one day's testing the only thing that's indisputable is that Mercedes did more laps than anyone else. Everything else is pure peculation of what may happen.
Well, that's all very sensible and reasonably put. Sadly, it's not how the internet works.

Vaud

50,426 posts

155 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Smollet said:
After just one day's testing the only thing that's indisputable is that Mercedes did more laps than anyone else. Everything else is pure peculation of what may happen.
That - and you can be sure that McLaren are behind on their planned testing schedule...

London424

12,828 posts

175 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Ferrari fast straight off this morning.

McL a couple of install laps

Sauber seems to be putting the mileage in.

007 VXR

64,187 posts

187 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Lets hope they all get some good laps in today smile


London424

12,828 posts

175 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
007 VXR said:
Lets hope they all get some good laps in today smile
Lotus are even out doing an install lap!

I hope they give Grosjean a good car...thought he came on really well the second half of the season once Kimi had handed in his notice.

DS240

4,657 posts

218 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
As interesting as it is to follow the new cars as soon as they are rolling, i'm not going to get drawn into the lap times and start coming to any conclusions too much at this stage. Who knows what settings are being run in comparison to others. The only time it matters is at the first race in qualifying and the race itself, only then can any measured assessment be made.

I got swept along last year thinking no one would hardly complete the first race last year, when really I should have known some of it was exaggerated doomsday predictions and also looked at it realistically in terms of what these teams are capable of.

So, as nice as it is to see Vettel doing quick laps at the moment, it can all change, there's already massive chunks of time being found so the actual real pace is a long way from being seen. The only conclusions which can be made are speculative. Even if Mclaren are struggling to get the Honda going, there's a long way to go before realsitic predictions of a poor season can be made.

It's just nice knowing a new season is closing in fast... no matter who is pace setting.

RichardM5

1,736 posts

136 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
andburg said:
Mercedes - claim not to have spent any of their tokens, does this mean they are currently running the 2014 spec ICE? if they are then the speed of that mercedes is even more astounding and could get even faster
not sure that can be taken at face value?

they may well be running the same ICE, but no way would they not have taken the opportunity to change out the electronics etc. it's not like they did not have significant failures last year that they will have wanted to address.
But they can make changes on reliability grounds without spending tokens. So maybe they have reworked all the bits they could on reliability grounds, but not yet changed anything that would use tokens.

London424

12,828 posts

175 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
RichardM5 said:
But they can make changes on reliability grounds without spending tokens. So maybe they have reworked all the bits they could on reliability grounds, but not yet changed anything that would use tokens.
They've apparently found an extra 50hp, I can't see that being from reliability only.

However you may be right that they are running 2014 engine at this test as a baseline for measuring the effectiveness of the other car changes.

suffolk009

5,373 posts

165 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Red Bull camouflage on the front wing is SOOO much better than the stuff on the car.




ETA: Images.

Edited by suffolk009 on Monday 2nd February 10:17


Edited by suffolk009 on Monday 2nd February 10:20

Teppic

7,345 posts

257 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
Kvyat damaged the wing in a minor off. He was then sent out for a series of installation laps which, due to the slow speed they are run at, did not really warrant putting a replacement wing on.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Monday 2nd February 2015
quotequote all
RichardM5 said:
But they can make changes on reliability grounds without spending tokens. So maybe they have reworked all the bits they could on reliability grounds, but not yet changed anything that would use tokens.
really?

had not thought of that...

Still, we know that have done a lot of development work, so I think it's unimaginable that they won;t use it? why wouldn't they?