Horners at it again

Horners at it again

Author
Discussion

Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

148 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
bullies180 said:
thought i'd dig this up, can't find the links to when horner said that it is other teams responsibilities to catch red bull up back in 2011 i think.

http://www.racer.com/f1/item/111324-rbr-f1-can-t-f...
Just some links and quotes from CH from previous years when RBR where winning

http://www.redbull.com/uk/en/motorsports/f1/storie...

http://www.rte.ie/sport/motorsport/f1/2013/1120/48...

http://www.rte.ie/sport/motorsport/f1/2013/1120/48...

"Asked about Vettel's accusation of “dirty tricks” in the sport, Horner said, “It's been a tough competition. F1 is a tough business, and you're up against some big opponents. The fastest way to become unpopular is to have repeated success. We've ignored what other teams are think and just really focused on ourselves.”

“In all honesty, Mercedes have done the best job this year - and all that does is motivate you,”, “You know how much work goes into winning a championship and to win it four times in a row [as we did in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013] is an enormous achievement"

“We don’t have the heritage of Ferrari, McLaren or even Mercedes. It probably sits uneasy with those guys for a young upstart team to come in with a young driver and achieve what we have. Somebody said to me that the best way to become unpopular is to win consistently.”

The execution of the Red Bull master plan, with Horner at the helm and Vettel wearing the visor, is not about to relent any time soon. “You push boundaries,” Horner says.

“That is what winning is all about. We will continue to push, because the moment you stand still you are going backwards.”


Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

148 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
Doink said:
D-I-V-O-R-C-E

Scuffers

20,887 posts

275 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
Mermaid said:
Doink said:
D-I-V-O-R-C-E
and use who?

merc already at the limit of teams

Mermaid

21,492 posts

172 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
Scuffers said:
Mermaid said:
Doink said:
D-I-V-O-R-C-E
and use who?

merc already at the limit of teams
Good point, going to be an unpredictable, uncomfortable season for RBR

Europa1

10,923 posts

189 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
deadslow said:
btcc123 said:
Funny they were not moaning when they were winning.
no, but every other team was, and they were forever being copied by rivals or 'looked at' by c whiting after others' bleating. its the nature of the game.
The other teams were "bleating" because Red Bull were, to put it generously, "interpreting the rules" to the maximum. Mercedes on the other hand seem to have just built a very good car and a phenomenally good power unit.

Horner's stock response on previous years was always along the lines of "the other teams should do a better job".

On a related note, who at the FIA writes the rules and does an adult check their homework? How did their supposedly frozen engine rule have a loophole you could drive a Ferrari through? Whilst I was never a fan of Max Mosley as a person, I do get the impression that under him the FIA was at least occasionally effective, whereas under Jean Todt, alll they are doing is fiddling/freezing helmet designs while Rome burns.

Swervin_Mervin

4,465 posts

239 months

Thursday 19th March 2015
quotequote all
Europa1 said:
deadslow said:
btcc123 said:
Funny they were not moaning when they were winning.
no, but every other team was, and they were forever being copied by rivals or 'looked at' by c whiting after others' bleating. its the nature of the game.
The other teams were "bleating" because Red Bull were, to put it generously, "interpreting the rules" to the maximum. Mercedes on the other hand seem to have just built a very good car and a phenomenally good power unit.

Horner's stock response on previous years was always along the lines of "the other teams should do a better job".

On a related note, who at the FIA writes the rules and does an adult check their homework? How did their supposedly frozen engine rule have a loophole you could drive a Ferrari through? Whilst I was never a fan of Max Mosley as a person, I do get the impression that under him the FIA was at least occasionally effective, whereas under Jean Todt, alll they are doing is fiddling/freezing helmet designs while Rome burns.
All teams should always be "interpreting the rules" to the maximum. It's F1 FFS.

And Merc have built a corker seemingly yes. But the €€€ that's been spent doing so is hardly in the spirit of keeping costs down. Or even vaguely reasonable!

Doink

Original Poster:

1,652 posts

148 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
An extract from one of the links above....

Vettel set a new F1 record on Sunday for number of consecutive victories in one season with his eighth in a row.

Horner, however, feels the critics should focus more on Red Bull's rivals for not doing a good enough job.

"We compete in a championship to the same regulations as all the others," said Horner.

"So, we do the best job we can and then we measure ourselves against our opponents every couple of weeks. It is not down to us to help the others to succeed.

"Our focus is very much on ourselves to improve, and we will look at every grand prix to see where we can do better, where can we improve - operationally, technically, with reliability or from the drivers.

"We don't feel in any way bad about the fact we have done a lot of winning, and it never gets boring because what you have to remember are the days when we were not winning.


Swervin_Mervin

4,465 posts

239 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Gaz. said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
The deficit between Merc and the other teams, off the back of the Aus GP, would appear to be a real gulf. Way bigger than RBR ever had over others. You can begin to understand why Massa was publicly scratching his head about the difference.
Have a look at the Singapore GP:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/09/22/2013-singapo...

After the safety car on lap 30 Vettel pulls out a 30 second lead by lap 42, pits and then pulls out another 33 second lead by lap 60. 3rd place was 44 seconds behind at the flag- in 15 laps.
Unfortunately no one really knows how much of that was down to the car or Vettel who seemingly most considered the best, by some margin, at exploiting the blown diffuser. I know that doesn't change the end result in terms of the dominance but it puts it in a different light to the dominance of the Mercs

andburg

7,295 posts

170 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
But the €€€ that's been spent doing so is hardly in the spirit of keeping costs down. Or even vaguely reasonable!
Based on 2014 budgets that were published by BBC Red Bull and Ferrari spent far more than Mercedes did!

1. Red Bull and Ferrari- £250m

2. Mercedes and McLaren - £200m

3. Lotus - £130m

4. Williams, Force India, Toro Rosso and Sauber - £100m

5. Marussia - £70m


Not syaing these are accurant, all over the web you'll find differnt figures : https://infogr.am/team-f1-2014-budget-and-employee...

but all seem to follow the same pattern

6. Caterham - £60m

longblackcoat

5,047 posts

184 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
andburg said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
But the €€€ that's been spent doing so is hardly in the spirit of keeping costs down. Or even vaguely reasonable!
Based on 2014 budgets that were published by BBC Red Bull and Ferrari spent far more than Mercedes did!

1. Red Bull and Ferrari- £250m

2. Mercedes and McLaren - £200m

3. Lotus - £130m

4. Williams, Force India, Toro Rosso and Sauber - £100m

5. Marussia - £70m


Not syaing these are accurant, all over the web you'll find diffewhrnt figures : https://infogr.am/team-f1-2014-budget-and-employee...

but all seem to follow the same pattern

6. Caterham - £60m
You're missing the fact that Mercedes have a shedload of employees elsewhere in the organisation who they can draw on for R&D for whom they don't get charged. And the development cost of getting their turbo engine from inception to assembly has been estimated at anything up to €1bn.

If you look at the Mercedes F1 accounts you see that in 2013 the running costs pf the engine shop were £133.9m and the team cost £190.7m. So the running costs for the year were more like £325m.

That said, I don't know what the Renault engine plant costs to run, but I'd be surprised if it's materially different to the Mercedes one, and I'd be surprised if that's included in the RB £250m costs quoted above.

Mr_Thyroid

1,995 posts

228 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
Gaz. said:
Swervin_Mervin said:
The deficit between Merc and the other teams, off the back of the Aus GP, would appear to be a real gulf. Way bigger than RBR ever had over others. You can begin to understand why Massa was publicly scratching his head about the difference.
Have a look at the Singapore GP:

http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2013/09/22/2013-singapo...

After the safety car on lap 30 Vettel pulls out a 30 second lead by lap 42, pits and then pulls out another 33 second lead by lap 60. 3rd place was 44 seconds behind at the flag- in 15 laps.
Unfortunately no one really knows how much of that was down to the car or Vettel who seemingly most considered the best, by some margin, at exploiting the blown diffuser. I know that doesn't change the end result in terms of the dominance but it puts it in a different light to the dominance of the Mercs
Yes and part of the problem now is that we don't know how much the Mercedes have in hand. When Vettel was running away with it typically Webber was scrapping to get on the podium so it was not whole team domination - a bit like Schumi's domination, it was only 2004 were Rubens dominated the runner up spot - even when the second placed team were apparently cheating.

suffolk009

5,425 posts

166 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Just read Will Buxton's blog about Red Bull wanting to quit. https://willthef1journo.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/r...

The bit I found pertinent for this topic is that apparently Red Bull faired so much worse than Red Bull in Oz because they forced Renault to run parts that hadn't been tested and Renault were reluctant to run.

I don't recall seeing that reported elsewhere.

andburg

7,295 posts

170 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
its been reported on Autosport i remember reading it.

spats

838 posts

156 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Swervin_Mervin said:
Did you see a different race to me? The one I watched saw the Ferrari finish 30s behind the Mercs. 30s! They might have improved but unless they've a lot in reserve (which I imagine the Mercs have as well anyway) then there's little chance they'll push Merc this year.

The deficit between Merc and the other teams, off the back of the Aus GP, would appear to be a real gulf. Way bigger than RBR ever had over others. You can begin to understand why Massa was publicly scratching his head about the difference.
I didn't say Ferrari were up for beating Merc though wink But they did finish ahead of the rest of the pack. They do that consistently and reliably and if merc have issues they win by default.

All due respect to Massa, hes a driver not a technician. Its clear Mercs whole package works from driver, to engine, to aero right down to the tyres, where as the Williams has way way less to spend and understandably haven't got the full package like merc have (drivers included imoa)

spats

838 posts

156 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Durzel said:
spats said:
Yes it would be harder to swallow if the driver lineup didn't include a Brit.
A telling statement I think. If Vettel were in this car, having moved from RBR to them and had continued dominating I'm sure people would be singing a completely different tune.
There would certainly be a few people who would think that. Im not his biggest fan as I was sure he would struggle without the blown rear end which was in sync with he style. He then had a crap year being out down by DR (although now its left me wondering how much was him just not bothering to get out of his contract) But if he went to merc and started winning races again in a different team and a totally different car I would have no objections to him winning as it would prove (much like LH has) that hes not a one trick pony. I do really hope he SV keeps producing results like the first race!

spats

838 posts

156 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Doink said:
An extract from one of the links above....

Vettel set a new F1 record on Sunday for number of consecutive victories in one season with his eighth in a row.

Horner, however, feels the critics should focus more on Red Bull's rivals for not doing a good enough job.

"We compete in a championship to the same regulations as all the others," said Horner.

"So, we do the best job we can and then we measure ourselves against our opponents every couple of weeks. It is not down to us to help the others to succeed.

"Our focus is very much on ourselves to improve, and we will look at every grand prix to see where we can do better, where can we improve - operationally, technically, with reliability or from the drivers.

"We don't feel in any way bad about the fact we have done a lot of winning, and it never gets boring because what you have to remember are the days when we were not winning.
Surely he has to be regretting some of these now!

DanielSan

18,804 posts

168 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
Sniff Petrol at it again hehe

F1 Team bosses demand fairness.

Rival F1 team bosses have today issued an extraordinary request to be allowed to spend the night with Christian Horner’s fiancé.

The remarkable ‘indecent proposal’ follows Horner’s complaints about the disparity in performance between Mercedes and other engines, including the Renault MalheureusementTech unit used by Red Bull. ‘You don’t hear Christian complaining about how many Spice Girls he gets to see in the buff do you?’ grumbled one anonymous team principal. ‘Well the rest of us aren’t happy about it and we believe the FIA should intervene to level the playing field between those of us who get to bump their bits against a Wannabe hit maker and those of us who don’t’.

The disgruntled team bosses have yet to outline how exactly they would implement a plan to ensure everyone had a fair crack at getting jiggy with a Spice Girl, especially since it might require buy-in from other former members of the hit girl group. ‘We’d definitely look at getting in the other Spice Girls, for the good of the sport,’ said one insider. ‘And dividing them up could be easier than you think, especially as Peter Sauber said he’d even consider an evening of zig-a-zig-ah with Sporty Spice and ‘wouldn’t kick her out of bed for singing one of her solo records’.’

The efforts to divide Spice Girls between team bosses in the name of ‘fairness’ is further simplified by the exemption of Claire Williams, who wasn’t part of discussions as she was hosting a charity bake sale that day, and Monisha Kaltenborn, who should not be allowed near any ‘90s pop stars in case she accidentally promises them a drive.

andyps

7,817 posts

283 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
hora said:
The more I read and see the more I don't like the bloke.
Same here, and I didn't have a high opinion of him a few years ago....

jbudgie

8,935 posts

213 months

Friday 20th March 2015
quotequote all
andyps said:
hora said:
The more I read and see the more I don't like the bloke.
Same here, and I didn't have a high opinion of him a few years ago....
With you guys on this. tongue out