Redbull not to use Renault engines in 2016

Redbull not to use Renault engines in 2016

Author
Discussion

skeggysteve

Original Poster:

5,724 posts

217 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
On Autosport:

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120696

So which engine will they use?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
skeggysteve said:
On Autosport:

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/120696

So which engine will they use?
ferrari?

paulrockliffe

15,698 posts

227 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Ferrari won't sell Red Bull an engine. Neither will Mercedes. Can't imagine Honda would welcome their st right now either. So Cosworth?

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
paulrockliffe said:
Ferrari won't sell Red Bull an engine. Neither will Mercedes. Can't imagine Honda would welcome their st right now either. So Cosworth?
no chance.

Cosworth (as in the F1 engine builders) no longer exists, and even if it did and had a HUGE bag of cash, would need 2+ years to come up with a serviceable powertrain.

the real answer is either Merc or Ferrari, and I suspect neither of them want to go there.

Gillett66

98 posts

143 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Not Cosworth in a million years.

70% Ferrari, otherwise Mercedes

-crookedtail-

1,563 posts

190 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Did Red Bull pay for their Renault engines or were they the 'official supplier'?

If the latter they really need to have a word with themselves, the engines have been poor, granted, but surely you need to work through them. This engine token rubbish is causing more problems than it solves imho.

skeggysteve

Original Poster:

5,724 posts

217 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
I'll just throw this in for discussion.

Infiniti - Redbull sponsor

Infiniti is Nissan.

Nissan make/brand a lot of engine for sports car series.

But as it's not been said this week - Audi wink

London424

12,829 posts

175 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Merc would be nuts to supply them. If they did they should put a clause in limiting their maps etc.

Cyder

7,052 posts

220 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
To throw an even more interesting one into the discussion, Renault, Daimler and Nissan(Infiniti) are in alliance together sharing engines and platforms already, so it wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility for Merc to supply the engines and Infiniti to keep sponsoring the team.

Some current Infiniti road cars use the Merc Diesel engine I believe.

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
skeggysteve said:
I'll just throw this in for discussion.

Infiniti - Redbull sponsor

Infiniti is Nissan.

Nissan make/brand a lot of engine for sports car series.

But as it's not been said this week - Audi wink
Nissan = Renault

no new engine is an option, quite apart from the massive costs to develop one, the time is simply not there for 2016


KarlMac

4,480 posts

141 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Most likely RBR to miss a year than Cosworth/Audi/Honda.

Or suffer on with Renault unit following review of development rules.

Derek Smith

45,655 posts

248 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Merc. I reckon they are under pressure to do so.

Despite RB being allowed to dominate the sport for years, not to mention Ferrari before them, a season and a bit's domination of the sport, with the car/engine/driver/team combination setup set, it is considered a threat to the spirit of F1.

One wonders why? Many might have their own opinions.


Blayney

2,948 posts

186 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Would be funny if they got Ferrari engines. Last time they dumped that contract on Toro Rosso so they could have the Renault engines...

FourWheelDrift

88,510 posts

284 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Renault buys Lotus, their Mercedes engines go to Red Bull.

Mercedes has already run an upgraded engine to the pole/win at Monza that their customers do not have. Same next year, Red Bull get the customer Mercedes engine one spec behind the factory team. It'll still be better than the Renault they currently have but not as good as the one in Hamilton and Rosberg's cars.

Emeye

9,773 posts

223 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
How about Merc supply Red Bull, then leave F1 as a team owner in a couple of years but continue as an engine manufacturer only?

Probably a lot cheaper and worked well for them before with Mclaren?

Muzzer79

9,948 posts

187 months

Sunday 6th September 2015
quotequote all
Derek Smith said:
Merc. I reckon they are under pressure to do so.

Despite RB being allowed to dominate the sport for years, not to mention Ferrari before them, a season and a bit's domination of the sport, with the car/engine/driver/team combination setup set, it is considered a threat to the spirit of F1.

One wonders why? Many might have their own opinions.
This

Bernie wants red bull with Merc engines.m what he wants, he usually gets unfortunately. He's worried Mateschitz will take his toys and play somewhere else......

I think Mercedes would be mental to supply them.....

Scuffers

20,887 posts

274 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Mercedes has already run an upgraded engine to the pole/win at Monza that their customers do not have. Same next year, Red Bull get the customer Mercedes engine one spec behind the factory team. It'll still be better than the Renault they currently have but not as good as the one in Hamilton and Rosberg's cars.
you're reading too much into this.

the customer teams get the same option of engines the works team do.

only reason merc ran the new engine and customers did not is because of 2 reasons:

1) they did not want to risk it (see Nico for details)
2) they were out of sequence for a new engine in their yearly allocation.


LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Muzzer79 said:
Derek Smith said:
Merc. I reckon they are under pressure to do so.

Despite RB being allowed to dominate the sport for years, not to mention Ferrari before them, a season and a bit's domination of the sport, with the car/engine/driver/team combination setup set, it is considered a threat to the spirit of F1.

One wonders why? Many might have their own opinions.
This

Bernie wants red bull with Merc engines.m what he wants, he usually gets unfortunately. He's worried Mateschitz will take his toys and play somewhere else......

I think Mercedes would be mental to supply them.....
I agree. Mercedes are gong to be forced into supplying red bull by the organisers I suspect, and then all we're going to get is how red bull don't get the pick of the engines if they don't win.

The one thing I'm not so certain about, is who would supply red bull with fuel and oil as I'm under the impression that this is quite critical to the performance?

London424

12,829 posts

175 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf said:
Muzzer79 said:
Derek Smith said:
Merc. I reckon they are under pressure to do so.

Despite RB being allowed to dominate the sport for years, not to mention Ferrari before them, a season and a bit's domination of the sport, with the car/engine/driver/team combination setup set, it is considered a threat to the spirit of F1.

One wonders why? Many might have their own opinions.
This

Bernie wants red bull with Merc engines.m what he wants, he usually gets unfortunately. He's worried Mateschitz will take his toys and play somewhere else......

I think Mercedes would be mental to supply them.....
I agree. Mercedes are gong to be forced into supplying red bull by the organisers I suspect, and then all we're going to get is how red bull don't get the pick of the engines if they don't win.

The one thing I'm not so certain about, is who would supply red bull with fuel and oil as I'm under the impression that this is quite critical to the performance?
Very much so.

I'm not sure of the Merc particulars but they mentioned the Ferrari deal this weekend on the coverage and they are on their 5th iteration of fuel and lubricants that has led to ~40 hp difference.

ETA: I think this is what Merc have alluded to with their new engine. It's the additional avenues it opens up for future work around the fuel etc

rdjohn

6,177 posts

195 months

Monday 7th September 2015
quotequote all
Renault will either become a team, or pack up and leave.

They have now said it will be Austin before they spend their engine upgrade tokens. National political will play a part, but if the engine is still a dud a la Honda, I think that they will quit. Bernie has been helping with the wages at Lotus and promised Renault a seat at the top table if they stay. All to get RB a decent engine and up at the front again.

If Renault stay, the RB will get the Merc engine and I suppose TR a Ferrari, while Renault get their act together. If Renault go, then so will Lotus. The financial sword still hangs over Sauber, Force India and Manor.

Hass arrival next year is likely to be the future format of F1, buy your bits from the top teams and effectively run customer cars. There is much more still at stake than just RB getting a useful package