McLaren lose Tag Heuer

McLaren lose Tag Heuer

Author
Discussion

jammy_basturd

29,778 posts

213 months

Wednesday 23rd December 2015
quotequote all
I'm not disputing the figures. But how on earth did Ron/McLaren get Honda to agree to such a deal. I just can't see what Honda get out of this. As someone from Renault said a few months back, the engine manufacturer gets very little of the plaudits when a team is winning, which takes a HUGE amount of money and resources, but gets a lot of the flak when a team is performing badly.

revrange

1,182 posts

185 months

Wednesday 23rd December 2015
quotequote all
jammy_basturd said:
I'm not disputing the figures. But how on earth did Ron/McLaren get Honda to agree to such a deal. I just can't see what Honda get out of this. As someone from Renault said a few months back, the engine manufacturer gets very little of the plaudits when a team is winning, which takes a HUGE amount of money and resources, but gets a lot of the flak when a team is performing badly.
Well partly Honda loves racing, and i guess also feels unfinished business. the history of mclaren-honda as well. mclaren also probably said we need investment for tooling/hire staff etc to get the chassis right, no point in your chaps supplying a great engine (no laughing) and then us produce a dud chassis. £100m to Honda within its R&D/Marketing budget isn't going to be the end of the world. Remember in Merc hey day with McLaren they paid them around £40m a season

Halmyre

11,209 posts

140 months

Wednesday 23rd December 2015
quotequote all
revrange said:
jammy_basturd said:
I'm not disputing the figures. But how on earth did Ron/McLaren get Honda to agree to such a deal. I just can't see what Honda get out of this. As someone from Renault said a few months back, the engine manufacturer gets very little of the plaudits when a team is winning, which takes a HUGE amount of money and resources, but gets a lot of the flak when a team is performing badly.
Well partly Honda loves racing, and i guess also feels unfinished business. the history of mclaren-honda as well. mclaren also probably said we need investment for tooling/hire staff etc to get the chassis right, no point in your chaps supplying a great engine (no laughing) and then us produce a dud chassis. £100m to Honda within its R&D/Marketing budget isn't going to be the end of the world. Remember in Merc hey day with McLaren they paid them around £40m a season
Honda probably lose £100m down the back of the sofa every day. Either that or it's in the books as "written-off losses".

RYH64E

7,960 posts

245 months

Thursday 24th December 2015
quotequote all
revrange said:
Well partly Honda loves racing,
Honda isn't a car enthusiast with a taste for Motorsport, it's a multinational car company with an obligation to maximise the return to their shareholders by selling cars. If F1 helps them sell more cars then their investment is a legitimate business expense, if not it's no different to me billing my company for a night out at a strip club because I love naked women...