The "difference" between a great and good driver...
Discussion
Dryce said:
vonuber said:
Difference between a good and a great? In general, the timing of what car you end up in. There are outliers of course, like Schumacher or Senna, but in general that's the case.
I think this aspect of timing or right place/right time has a lot to do with with how things appear.Fernando Alonso is an example of a driver where early career timing worked well and thereafter things went astray. How would we think of him today had he not had the early Benetton years.
I would also say that the top elite drivers have magical moments like amazing drive in the wet from near the back or some overtake on the outside of a corner which defies the odds.
We have seen thsi from the likes of LH MS AS but not so much from NR maybe even SV?
They have also had good results in some pig cars too
We have seen thsi from the likes of LH MS AS but not so much from NR maybe even SV?
They have also had good results in some pig cars too
There is one thing that sticks in my mind, that only one driver is the last 30 years or so has managed to win at least one race in every season he has raced regardless of the car. Step forward Lewis Hamilton. Some of his McLaren seasons were in a pretty awful car, yet he still managed at least one win each year. In 2008 the Ferrari was a better all-round car but he managed the WDC.
swisstoni said:
London424 said:
Rocking up to a brand new track and being fast is a pretty good indicator.
This weekend should be interesting then.I also think it removes some of the machinery component too.
It's drivers getting to grips with things.
Next year at the track I'm guessing things will become much more normalised.
London424 said:
swisstoni said:
London424 said:
Rocking up to a brand new track and being fast is a pretty good indicator.
This weekend should be interesting then.I also think it removes some of the machinery component too.
It's drivers getting to grips with things.
Next year at the track I'm guessing things will become much more normalised.
I'm not suggesting that this means Rosberg is "better". But I do think the gap between him and Rosberg is really not as vast as the original article made out... Hamilton is slightly better and over the course of a career, that will result in a wider gap in terms of victories and success. Per race, per corner, not much in it!
AdvocatusD said:
London424 said:
swisstoni said:
London424 said:
Rocking up to a brand new track and being fast is a pretty good indicator.
This weekend should be interesting then.I also think it removes some of the machinery component too.
It's drivers getting to grips with things.
Next year at the track I'm guessing things will become much more normalised.
I'm not suggesting that this means Rosberg is "better". But I do think the gap between him and Rosberg is really not as vast as the original article made out... Hamilton is slightly better and over the course of a career, that will result in a wider gap in terms of victories and success. Per race, per corner, not much in it!
If he makes an epic comeback tomorrow (which could happen with the possibility of a safety car and crash disrupted race) then the question may answer itself.
I always consider a great driver to be one who comes back from adversity. Kimi used to be great, Japan 2005, from last to first.
Leading from the front is easy in comparison.
I always consider a great driver to be one who comes back from adversity. Kimi used to be great, Japan 2005, from last to first.
Leading from the front is easy in comparison.
Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff