should the radio ban stay?
Poll: should the radio ban stay?
Total Members Polled: 251
Discussion
Adrian W said:
alangla said:
I'm sure years ago the cars used to have to pit & a laptop would be plugged into a socket in the cockpit to allow electronic faults to be resolved.
How about... Limited adjustment while on the move (e.g. brake bias, energy recovery level, one or two other things) and allowing the team to adjust settings wirelessly via a loop antenna embedded in the pit box area. The car could receive updates from the team while it was stationary in the pits in much the same way that front wing angles are adjusted by mechanics while stopped, but only basic stuff could changed while on the move. This should still allow the teams to tweak the car's setup for each stint, but would allow the drivers to concentrate on driving, rather than faffing about with all those controls on the wheel.
Isn't one of the current fundamental rules of motor racing that you can take data from the car in a race but cannot send data to the car? I thought this is to effectively stop the engineers remotely controlling the car.How about... Limited adjustment while on the move (e.g. brake bias, energy recovery level, one or two other things) and allowing the team to adjust settings wirelessly via a loop antenna embedded in the pit box area. The car could receive updates from the team while it was stationary in the pits in much the same way that front wing angles are adjusted by mechanics while stopped, but only basic stuff could changed while on the move. This should still allow the teams to tweak the car's setup for each stint, but would allow the drivers to concentrate on driving, rather than faffing about with all those controls on the wheel.
alangla said:
Adrian W said:
alangla said:
I'm sure years ago the cars used to have to pit & a laptop would be plugged into a socket in the cockpit to allow electronic faults to be resolved.
How about... Limited adjustment while on the move (e.g. brake bias, energy recovery level, one or two other things) and allowing the team to adjust settings wirelessly via a loop antenna embedded in the pit box area. The car could receive updates from the team while it was stationary in the pits in much the same way that front wing angles are adjusted by mechanics while stopped, but only basic stuff could changed while on the move. This should still allow the teams to tweak the car's setup for each stint, but would allow the drivers to concentrate on driving, rather than faffing about with all those controls on the wheel.
Isn't one of the current fundamental rules of motor racing that you can take data from the car in a race but cannot send data to the car? I thought this is to effectively stop the engineers remotely controlling the car.How about... Limited adjustment while on the move (e.g. brake bias, energy recovery level, one or two other things) and allowing the team to adjust settings wirelessly via a loop antenna embedded in the pit box area. The car could receive updates from the team while it was stationary in the pits in much the same way that front wing angles are adjusted by mechanics while stopped, but only basic stuff could changed while on the move. This should still allow the teams to tweak the car's setup for each stint, but would allow the drivers to concentrate on driving, rather than faffing about with all those controls on the wheel.
Better to require it to be a cable, or a control panel on the outside of the car, to prevent temptation.
rsbmw said:
Mr_Thyroid said:
Or certain drivers should knuckle down, concentrate, put down the celebrity bimbo and read the manual.
There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
For what we know, Hamilton may have understood his wheel and all of his settings perfectly. The engineers programmed something incorrectly which meant he then didn't know what was causing a problem, and they couldn't tell him what they had done wrong. Not a lot he could do with that situation except as he said himself on the radio started changing things, which he was told not to do. All the comments about Hamilton not knowing how to use his wheel are fairly stupid, as that's not what happened here. If the team had been able to tell him "change to xyz", in sure he would have known what to do on his wheel to accomplish that.There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
swisstoni said:
Precisely. All that rot about Hamilton not being clever enough to understand the wheel as well as Rosberg was beginning to leave a nasty taste.
Saying that, Rosberg is more of a thinking driver whereas Hamilton is instinctive, so I always thought that Rosberg would benefit from the radio ban. Hamilton gets more stressed when there is a tech issue - Rosberg seems a lot cooler about it.
The irony is that Hamilton started the weekend slating the drivers who were moaning about the safety of the track, and then ends the weekend moaning about the safety of trying to troubleshoot a tech problem while driving.
But hey, that's fine. Because Hamilton.
Emeye said:
swisstoni said:
Precisely. All that rot about Hamilton not being clever enough to understand the wheel as well as Rosberg was beginning to leave a nasty taste.
Saying that, Rosberg is more of a thinking driver whereas Hamilton is instinctive, so I always thought that Rosberg would benefit from the radio ban. Hamilton gets more stressed when there is a tech issue - Rosberg seems a lot cooler about it.
The irony is that Hamilton started the weekend slating the drivers who were moaning about the safety of the track, and then ends the weekend moaning about the safety of trying to troubleshoot a tech problem while driving.
But hey, that's fine. Because Hamilton.
Mr_Thyroid said:
Or certain drivers should knuckle down, concentrate, put down the celebrity bimbo and read the manual.
Ooh celebrity, thats fresh, must have taken you ages to think of, well done.Stands to reason a front end designed to be operated by a driver when he had the support of a team of expert engineers sat comfortably at computers at his disposal, will be a different animal from one optimised for a driver whos having to do all the think and adjust on the fly.
Emeye said:
swisstoni said:
Precisely. All that rot about Hamilton not being clever enough to understand the wheel as well as Rosberg was beginning to leave a nasty taste.
Saying that, Rosberg is more of a thinking driver whereas Hamilton is instinctive, so I always thought that Rosberg would benefit from the radio ban. Hamilton gets more stressed when there is a tech issue - Rosberg seems a lot cooler about it.
swisstoni said:
rsbmw said:
Mr_Thyroid said:
Or certain drivers should knuckle down, concentrate, put down the celebrity bimbo and read the manual.
There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
For what we know, Hamilton may have understood his wheel and all of his settings perfectly. The engineers programmed something incorrectly which meant he then didn't know what was causing a problem, and they couldn't tell him what they had done wrong. Not a lot he could do with that situation except as he said himself on the radio started changing things, which he was told not to do. All the comments about Hamilton not knowing how to use his wheel are fairly stupid, as that's not what happened here. If the team had been able to tell him "change to xyz", in sure he would have known what to do on his wheel to accomplish that.There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
deadslow said:
EagleMoto4-2 said:
Really? So what happened to Rosberg in Barcelona when he had the wrong engine setting, then panicked and tried to put Hamilton in the wall. Not the actions of a cool driver who know's what he is doing.
wow, just wow rsbmw said:
Mr_Thyroid said:
Or certain drivers should knuckle down, concentrate, put down the celebrity bimbo and read the manual.
There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
For what we know, Hamilton may have understood his wheel and all of his settings perfectly. The engineers programmed something incorrectly which meant he then didn't know what was causing a problem, and they couldn't tell him what they had done wrong. Not a lot he could do with that situation except as he said himself on the radio started changing things, which he was told not to do. All the comments about Hamilton not knowing how to use his wheel are fairly stupid, as that's not what happened here. If the team had been able to tell him "change to xyz", in sure he would have known what to do on his wheel to accomplish that.There have been many comments on here in the past about how manual gearboxes were great because the caused the drivers to make little slip ups. If one driver doesn't know all the setting then great, it increases the unpredictability of the racing. Of course in the last race it kind of prevented Hamilton from racing Perez, which was disappointing, but if it was the other way round it would have been great to see Perez catching and passing Hamilton for a podium spot - that is the kind of excitement we want to see.
It's just another skill that some drivers have and some don't - this is a non-issue.
Driver needs to be able to operate the car and all of the parameters that can be altered whilst driving, he should not be spoon fed over the radio.
deadslow said:
blueg33 said:
Still up to the team to design something that will let the driver get quickly back to a known setting.
restore default/factory settings button?Hardware engineer: "it's a software issue"
Software engineer: "it's a hardware issue"
"Thank you for calling the Mercedes engine management helpline. Your call is important to us. Calls may be recorded for training purposes and the best examples will be posted on Facebook. Please select from the following options..."
Emeye said:
swisstoni said:
Precisely. All that rot about Hamilton not being clever enough to understand the wheel as well as Rosberg was beginning to leave a nasty taste.
Saying that, Rosberg is more of a thinking driver whereas Hamilton is instinctive, so I always thought that Rosberg would benefit from the radio ban. Written in 2014, before the last race:
Nico - https://willthef1journo.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/t...
Lewis - https://willthef1journo.wordpress.com/2014/11/19/t...
Gareth1974 said:
deadslow said:
blueg33 said:
Still up to the team to design something that will let the driver get quickly back to a known setting.
restore default/factory settings button?Gassing Station | Formula 1 | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff