The Official 2017 F1 Pre-Season Thread

The Official 2017 F1 Pre-Season Thread

Author
Discussion

BrettMRC

4,084 posts

160 months

Friday 10th February 2017
quotequote all
Just giving this a bump...


How do we the fuel supplier change will impact Red Bull and McLaren? (Exxon to RB, BP/Castrol to McLaren & Renualt)

StevieBee

12,876 posts

255 months

Friday 10th February 2017
quotequote all
BrettMRC said:
Just giving this a bump...


How do we the fuel supplier change will impact Red Bull and McLaren? (Exxon to RB, BP/Castrol to McLaren & Renualt)
They use pump-grade fuel these days, not the special blend rocket fuel of the past. The move is purely commercial so the only difference will be the logos on the cars.

Vaud

50,450 posts

155 months

Friday 10th February 2017
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
They use pump-grade fuel these days, not the special blend rocket fuel of the past. The move is purely commercial so the only difference will be the logos on the cars.
Read up on Article 19 for the regs.

"The detailed requirements of this Article are intended to ensure the use of fuels that are composed of compounds normally found in commercial fuels and to prohibit the use of specific power-boosting chemical compounds"

Essentially it's the same chemicals as in pump fuel, but they had significant latitude within that composition, way more than just branding... it is not "pump fuel".

Europa1

10,923 posts

188 months

Friday 10th February 2017
quotequote all
Vaud said:
StevieBee said:
They use pump-grade fuel these days, not the special blend rocket fuel of the past. The move is purely commercial so the only difference will be the logos on the cars.
Read up on Article 19 for the regs.

"The detailed requirements of this Article are intended to ensure the use of fuels that are composed of compounds normally found in commercial fuels and to prohibit the use of specific power-boosting chemical compounds"

Essentially it's the same chemicals as in pump fuel, but they had significant latitude within that composition, way more than just branding... it is not "pump fuel".
Yep, I'm sure there was at least one article last year on how hard Petronas had worked on optimising the fuel for the Mercedes engine.

thegreenhell

15,320 posts

219 months

Friday 10th February 2017
quotequote all
This gives some useful insight into the challenges for the fuel and lubricant supplier.

http://www.motorsport.com/all/article/?id=872201

HardtopManual

2,427 posts

166 months

Saturday 11th February 2017
quotequote all
StevieBee said:
They use pump-grade fuel these days, not the special blend rocket fuel of the past. The move is purely commercial so the only difference will be the logos on the cars.
It's not just the fuel; the lubricants play an important part in extracting all of the available performance from the car.

McLaren in 2014 for instance had a 40bhp deficit to Mercedes even though the engine specs were identical. Most of that came from using Mobil 1 rather than Petronas, which doesn't bode well for RB this year if you ask me.

A lot of Ferrari's performance increase during 2015 came from work on fuel and lubricants after the disaster of 2014.

PhillipM

6,518 posts

189 months

Saturday 11th February 2017
quotequote all
The regulations were relaxed on fuels with the new power units, they very much play a massive part in engine performance these days, they're not all just off-the-shelf pump fuels at all.

audi321

5,183 posts

213 months

Wednesday 15th February 2017
quotequote all
So when do we think we'll have an idea as to who's hot and who's not for 2017? Are we going to have to wait for Australia or will the testing days show us anything (going by previous years).

I know they'll keep their true speed low so as not to give anything away, and looking at the times from the 2015 and 2016 testing days, the Mercs were nowhere close to first or second places.....but we all know what happened when the seasons started.

ajprice

27,469 posts

196 months

Wednesday 15th February 2017
quotequote all
We'll probably know who's sandbagging and who's up st creek in the testing, but not much more than a general idea of the order.

Vaud

50,450 posts

155 months

Wednesday 15th February 2017
quotequote all
Number of laps completed over the two tests might be one indication.

But sandbagging... who knows? I forget the source, but there were some indicators that the simulation data to the FIA showed some very big advances by some teams.

The proof, as ever is FP1 in March :-)

ajprice

27,469 posts

196 months

Wednesday 15th February 2017
quotequote all
I'm pretty sure that Mercedes hardly used soft tyres in the 2016 pre season tests.

Inertiatic

1,040 posts

190 months

Thursday 16th February 2017
quotequote all
Flooble said:
suffolk009 said:
Am I right inthinking that means that they'll have a standing start after they've done a few laps behind the safety car in the rain?

Also I'm seeing news that there'll be standing starts after each saftey car period.

Good grief, I mean I know the start is exciting. But this will look utterly stupid. I'm not a Football fan, but it's like the FA deciding that everyone likes seeing goals scored so matches will now be 80 minutes of penalties.
US Owners? I heard it said that American Football stops play so often in order to accommodate commercial breaks. Presumably having lots of pauses in the race would be ideal for slotting in some adverts.
I really hope not. I won't pay for sky anyway as refuse to pay for adverts, so F1 is harder to watch, and then if it gets choppy because of restarts and ad breaks it will be unwatchable anyway.

ISO51200

1,270 posts

194 months

Thursday 16th February 2017
quotequote all
Getting excited now, collected my team kit today and I fly to Barcelona next week, bring it on!

MartG

20,673 posts

204 months

Thursday 16th February 2017
quotequote all
Confirmed that Wehrlein will be missing the first test

http://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/wehrlein-to-miss...

Blib

44,030 posts

197 months

Thursday 16th February 2017
quotequote all
ISO51200 said:
Getting excited now, collected my team kit today and I fly to Barcelona next week, bring it on!
Red Bull? How exciting!!! What'a your role?

audi321

5,183 posts

213 months

Tuesday 21st February 2017
quotequote all
Sorry if it's been covered off before, but what's the changes to the exhaust note going to make? Have they released the sound of a 2017 car yet? That Williams video linked in another thread has some engine sounds but it sounded like a V8 from 2013 rather than these hybrid 1.6's?

LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
PRE-SEASON TESTING 2017

http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/10725059/f1...

Begins tomorrow at Barcelona, just a heads up, Sky F1 again has an inability to series link the TV schedule for some reason again. And you only get a 15 min round up for each day followed by a half hour Ted's Notebook of rambling nonsense.

MiniMan64

16,919 posts

190 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
This years grid, minus the Red Bulls..


suffolk009

5,385 posts

165 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
LaurasOtherHalf][b said:
....Ted's Notebook of rambling nonsense.
He's now also available in printed word format in evo magazine. He's the new motorsport columnist. It was basically 800 words to justify writing a couple of rude words. A bit silly really.



LaurasOtherHalf

21,429 posts

196 months

Sunday 26th February 2017
quotequote all
MiniMan64 said:
This years grid, minus the Red Bulls..

Red Bull rumoured to have a special livery again for pre season testing.