RE: PH Heroes: Jaguar XJR-S

RE: PH Heroes: Jaguar XJR-S

Author
Discussion

JohnBlackWatson

57 posts

166 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
[quote=XJSJohn]





XJSJohn, Is this a picture of your own car? can you tell me anything about the revised fuel-rail?

I think the XJ-S is probably an age-related car - those that grew up in the 70's love them, everybody else has reservations. A bit like craemola foam!

I have a 1994 4.0L which I absolutely love - it is ideal for cruising around London and belies the outer size with ease. Next month I get my hands on a '79 pre-HE model thes are probably the purest form of the XJ-S.

Other than petrol (which is really only a small percentage of any car's cost) these cars are reletavely cheap to maintain and insure - there is a large specialist spares market and 'classic' insurance - if you like the shape then don't be put off by potential cost - the joy of ownership more than makes up...

EDLT

15,421 posts

206 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
PPC did a buying guide on these a while back the biggest costs were rust and fuel iirc. Also they mentioned this carb kit:
http://www.webcon.co.uk/Downloads/PJA601-Feb07.pdf

nuts

Cassius81

283 posts

189 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
Is it me, or does the right hand exhaust on this particular car look like it has taken a knock? Or are they all like that?


Inverness

547 posts

178 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
Great cars, my Dad had one for 4 years, took it to Le Mans 4 times came back on a flat bed twicelaugh (but only due to silly things, and because the french mechanics wouldn't touch it with a bardge pole).

My Dad could keep up with me in my Subaru Impreza P1, it is one fast car, and it has pure grace!



Us at our digs in Le Mans 2004.

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

41,030 posts

190 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
JohnBlackWatson]JSJohn said:
XJSJohn, Is this a picture of your own car? can you tell me anything about the revised fuel-rail?
There was a recall for the fuel rail due to under bonnet fires. Think it went from round to square or vice versa.

Mine hadn't been done and recalls don't ever expire. I contacted Jaguar who approved the recall and I contacted a dealer. They fobbed my off for 2 years saying they couldn't find the parts.....

To be fair I didn't hassle them enough or get the factory involved any further than approving the recall initially. I probably should have done though. This was in around 2000 on a 1982 XJ-S HE.

lou556

185 posts

176 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
My father used to own a XJ-S 5.3 V12 HE in a fetching banana yellow finish, very 80's !! I wish he still owned it today as I never had the chance to experience the car as; it was sold before I was born. I would love to relive the era though by the way of a facelift 4.0 celebration: maybe in a year or so once I have the funds to purchase shares in BP then I might be able to afford the running costs !!

[AJ]

3,079 posts

198 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
My uncle had a red one back in the day and I absolutely loved it. I very nearly bought one a couple of years ago, but like the AM DB5, XK120, E-Type and Austin Healy 3000, I'll no doubt end up leaving it till they're too expensive for me to justify!

LuS1fer

41,133 posts

245 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
P9UNK said:
LuS1fer said:
It took an awful design and made it gruesome. Who in their right mind would design rear lights that were so incredibly fussy and still looked like an afterthought.

Edited by LuS1fer on Monday 6th June 08:41
back in the day, I was 9 when it came out, it looked very modern and a quick flick through a Motorshow guide of the day (there was a red one front on on the 1976 Daily Mail motor show review) would show you that it did look pretty good beside what else was available. Today it hasn't aged like the classic E-type but back then the E Type looked a bit yesterday and the XJS was tomorrow.
I was 16 and it was the biggest disappointm,ent of my petrolhead existence, not least when Jaguar's brochure was a combined effort with somf fashion house like Jaeger with lots of bad models trying to portray the sophistication of it all. The older Cotroen SM blew it away...no, wait, everything did. I have the '76 Motor Show Review too - compulsory buying back then!

Lord Flathead

1,288 posts

179 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
Great car, great writeup Riggers thumbup

Very fond memories of my next door neighbour who I befriended when I was 17. His dad died and he went out and bought a gold HE which was only a year old.. he was then 27. We spend about 4 years driving to and from Norfolk visiting another mate. These cars are true GT's, eating miles up. Listening to Grace Jones and Pink Floyd on the standard 4 speaker Philips cassette..

If you've never been in one, the description I used then was "It's like sitting on a silk cushion with a rocket up your arse" hehe


Mark-C

5,080 posts

205 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
300bhp/ton said:
Zumbruk said:
I really wanted an XJS until I looked under the bonnet. Absolutely terrifying.
They aren't nearly as bad as they look, except for changing some of the spark plugs.... wink
I bottled it ... took a long hard look under the bonnet on a V12 and then bought myself a straight 6 ....

911motorsport

7,251 posts

233 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
Got a 7 litre Lister Le Mans one of these parked up in the garage at the moment. 335 Tyres on the rear yikes

Denorth

559 posts

171 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
love XJS... one day... may be... Saw a shooting brake today in New Greenham Park, Newbury. That one was THE beauty.

It seems that there is some garage located there working with XJS only. Any time I am there, there is something new to see.

vixen1700

22,899 posts

270 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all


The Lynx Eventer. smile

Snoggledog

7,015 posts

217 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
I never quite understood the XJS until I was given a ride in one. Then I understood.

steveww

15 posts

227 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
I agree don't knock them until you have tried one. Deceptively quick, I remember the first time I drove one. I pulled down the ramp on to the motor way and thought to myself very nice but more wind noise than I expected.... Hmmm a lot of slow traffic on the road today... Holy sh*t I am doing 120mph!

Having wanted one for some time I took the plunge but did wimp on the V12 going for the 4.0 AJ16 instead. If I had been able to find one of the later 6.0 V12 with the 4 speed auto I would have gone for it.

urquattro

755 posts

186 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
It took an awful design and made it gruesome. Who in their right mind would design rear lights that were so incredibly fussy and still looked like an afterthought.

Edited by LuS1fer on Monday 6th June 08:41
I am sure us XJS owners will disagree with both your comments, I just hope your vehicle is the epitomy of design criteria and will stand the test of time as well as all models of XJS, its performance is good, mine has been converted to five speed manual etc etc, ok its not an E Type, was never meant to be. However, I have an equally good E Type to go with it (in my view) and make fine pair of Jaguar models with REAL character, not a modern inert piece of electronic driver aids.

urquattro

755 posts

186 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
JohnBlackWatson]JSJohn said:



XJSJohn, Is this a picture of your own car? can you tell me anything about the revised fuel-rail?

Standard V12 fuel rail unless my glasses fell off. !

I think the XJ-S is probably an age-related car - those that grew up in the 70's love them, everybody else has reservations. A bit like craemola foam!

I have a 1994 4.0L which I absolutely love - it is ideal for cruising around London and belies the outer size with ease. Next month I get my hands on a '79 pre-HE model thes are probably the purest form of the XJ-S.

Other than petrol (which is really only a small percentage of any car's cost) these cars are reletavely cheap to maintain and insure - there is a large specialist spares market and 'classic' insurance - if you like the shape then don't be put off by potential cost - the joy of ownership more than makes up...

300bhp/ton

Original Poster:

41,030 posts

190 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
urquattro said:
Other than petrol (which is really only a small percentage of any car's cost) these cars are reletavely cheap to maintain and insure
lol, petrol was certainly the most expensive and largest percentage during my XJ-S ownership. But I guess that just goes to show that they don't have to break the bank to run otherwise.

Reckon my 5.3 averaged around 11mpg most of the time!!! eek But it did sound glorious cloud9

mrobin33

930 posts

224 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all
Mark-C said:
300bhp/ton said:
Zumbruk said:
I really wanted an XJS until I looked under the bonnet. Absolutely terrifying.
They aren't nearly as bad as they look, except for changing some of the spark plugs.... wink
I bottled it ... took a long hard look under the bonnet on a V12 and then bought myself a straight 6 ....
If you look under the bonnet of most modern serious cars and take off all the naff plastic covers they are just as complex, if not more so, underneath. My Conti GT has so many covers, including fancy false ones for the injectors, that you cannot actually see anything functional. Now I know why they cover everything up, didn't realise it panicked people so much!

Anyway I bought an XJR-S a couple of years ago and scrapped it within a month due to terminal rot (yes caveat emptor etc). I am just about recovered enough now to dip my toe again but this time will go for an early 80's HE V12 when I can find a mint example. I still have the original launch brochure with the lovely flared safari suited 'gentleman' wafting around europe. A classic.

Cacatous

3,163 posts

273 months

Monday 6th June 2011
quotequote all