RE: Driven: Porsche GT3 RS 4.0

RE: Driven: Porsche GT3 RS 4.0

Friday 10th June 2011

Driven: Porsche GT3 RS 4.0

Last hurrah for the 996/997 era 911, and what a way to go!



If there's a world at Porsche beyond ever more hardcore 911 GT3 and GT2 variants (nine and counting on his watch), GT cars boss Andreas Preuninger doesn't appear to acknowledge it. Indeed, it's hard to imagine his department hanging out with colleagues on the Cayenne and Panamera production teams, or even giving them the time of day in the staff canteen.


It's that kind of single-minded focus that results in cars like the GT3 RS 4.0. It's not clear whether Preuninger is voicing the official line or his own personal view when he declares the RS 4.0 the ultimate 911. But it's clear there's bittersweet satisfaction that this car represents the conclusion of 12 years of expertise building GT3 911s.

Of course if you're a 911 fanboy you'll likely already know all about the GT3 RS 4.0. But, even if you've got the necessary £128,466 there's some bad news. They're already sold. All 600 of them. Of that number our contact at Porsche was somewhat vague on how many would be coming to the UK, eventually conceding it would be "around one per Porsche centre" but "less than 10% of the overall production run." So that'll be a number greater than 32 but fewer than 60 then.


That spec sheet statisticians won't find a whole lot to get excited about in the seemingly minor performance upgrades over a regular GT3 RS is to be applauded. After all, if Autobahn blitzing and spec sheet willy-waggling are your thing you still need a 911 with forced induction, the GT2 RS taking this to its most extreme conclusion.

No, the GT3 RS 4.0 is about details. Details resulting in the famous 'Mezger ' engine's capacity creeping up 200cc to make it the biggest ever fitted to a roadgoing 911 and boosting power over the regular GT3 RS from 450hp to 500hp and torque from 317lb ft to 339lb ft. The 4.0's additional aero - nine degrees of rear wing over the RS's six and front bumper mounted 'flics' to reduce resulting front-end lift - mean top speed is only 1mph up at 193mph and 0-62mph down a tenth to 3.9 seconds. But what was that about meaningless stats? The changes to the 4.0 can be better appreciated in just one corner on Silverstone's International Circuit.


On the advice of the bloke in the passenger seat - 1970 Le Mans winner and occasional 'Porsche Driving Consultant' Richard Attwood no less - I try short-shifting from third to fourth before turning into the new pit straight following the Club chicane. Where the regular RS would bog the 4.0 digs deep into its newly expanded torque curve and by the time I exit the corner I'm fast approaching the 8,500rpm redline, grabbing fifth and arriving at Abbey 20mph faster than I did on the last lap. Yikes!

Preuninger admits the 3.8 RS's flat six is "not a tractor engine" but by increasing the stroke - there was literally not enough metal in the block for any increase in bore - with the same crank as used in the half million pound RSR race car they wrung out those final few hp and lb ft. New heads, cams and shorter, wider inlet tracts also play their part in the astonishing 125hp per litre specific output. Oh, and if you're worried about durability part of the test programme was running flat out for 3,000km at Nardo.


The thing that strikes you from the wheel of the 4.0 is both the incredible response such a highly tuned, normally aspirated engine gives and the way detail improvements to the RS's already fabulous chassis help you exploit them. Sure, there's the usual PASM adjustable damping but Attwood's advice is to leave it in the standard setting and be done with it.

Like the GT2 RS, the 4.0 gets additional rose joints on the suspension arms and uprated coilovers with compensator springs to allow a shorter, lighter main spring. None of this fancy pants hardware can overcome those inherent 911 handling quirks though and the 4.0 still has that 'will it, won't it' light-nosed feel on turn-in that, assuming you've not totally overlooked the additional speed you arrived with (see above), can be bled off with a little bit of trail braking. The fierceness with which the engine responds has you wary of being too early on the power but, inevitably, even when you think you're being brave you're actually being a wuss and everyone will know about it, so loud is the exhaust when you're on properly on it. Dig deeper and the response is so accurate, the communication so undiluted that you can actually feel the differential begin to lock up and fire you out of the corner for that classic 911 slingshot effect.


Traction and stability control are there and can be independently disabled but drive with the smoothness and accuracy the 4.0 encourages and you'll only see them wake up at the very extremes of the handling envelope. At which point you'll most likely be glad of them.

Again it's the engine that dominates, the rate with which revs and speed build requiring serious mental recalibration. Like all 'proper' Porsches this is a car that makes demands of its driver and assumes a certain level of competence before giving its best. There's no Ferrari style ego massage here.

And though the stickers, plank-like rear wing, roll cage and aero flics mark you out as a bit of a tragic wannabe away from the track from the driver's seat you won't mind. Because, like the regular RS, the 4.0 is surprisingly viable as a road car. A road car that doubles, trebles even, speed limits in the blink of an eye admittedly. But it rides well, bumps, cambers and ridges clearly communicated via wheel and seat of the pants but the feedback so clear and faithful it's never intimidating.


It's on the track where this car really gives its best though and if there's one measure of the improvements that'll really count to aficionados it's that all-important 'ring lap time. And here it really shows, the 4.0's 7:27 six seconds faster than the 3.8 RS and 13 seconds quicker than a regular GT3. Matching performance like that will require a pair as steely as Röhrl's. But the satisfaction of knowing the car can do it - even if you can't - and would be perfectly acceptable for the long schlep home across Belgium is the kind of credibility an RS Porsche thrives on. This final swansong edition more so than ever.







Author
Discussion

Douglas Arfempty

Original Poster:

623 posts

186 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Wibble, Wibble, Wibble...

Chicane-UK

3,861 posts

185 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
I think I'd be a very happy man if I had that parked on my driveway!

RobCrezz

7,892 posts

208 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
4.0 just sounds so much better than 3.8 smile

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

230 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Perfection. Keep your 458s and MP4-12Cs, this is a real driver's car, and probably the last.

Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...

This is a brilliant shot...


SCR Racing

168 posts

169 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Sex wee everywhere!

Now how long until the "Don't like stickers/anything non-Audi grey/It looks chav" brigade turn up?

davislove

2,295 posts

246 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
all i'll say is I wouldn't want the job of project managing the next generation 911!!! good lord

soad

32,882 posts

176 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Want, love the duck tail smile

scampbird

265 posts

282 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Not sure I like the stickers, or the colour. It almost looks a bit chavvy.

johnpeat

5,326 posts

265 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...
Cliched nonsense trotted out far too many times already - I've no idea what defines an 'analogue' or 'digital' car and neither have you.

I stopped reading car magazines to avoid this tripe, please don't make this place untidy with it as well.

Meanwhile - mandatory white paintwork and extra 200c cause existing GT3 RS owners to go "oh fk off Porsche..."

adycav

7,615 posts

217 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...
Sadly, I think that you are probably right.

Certainly at the six-figure supercar level.

epom

11,489 posts

161 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
ah that'd be a waste of all that engineering on me... still take the sport classic thanks !!

adycav

7,615 posts

217 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
Beefmeister said:
Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...
Cliched nonsense trotted out far too many times already - I've no idea what defines an 'analogue' or 'digital' car and neither have you.
A little harsh perhaps, Beefmeister drives a truckload of supercars...

Edited by adycav on Friday 10th June 11:38

Oddball RS

1,757 posts

218 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
Beefmeister said:
Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...
Cliched nonsense trotted out far too many times already - I've no idea what defines an 'analogue' or 'digital' car and neither have you.

I stopped reading car magazines to avoid this tripe, please don't make this place untidy with it as well.

Meanwhile - mandatory white paintwork and extra 200c cause existing GT3 RS owners to go "oh fk off Porsche..."
how do you know that?????? they have sold 600? seems they are happy to me???

Anh

201 posts

174 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
Perfection. Keep your 458s and MP4-12Cs, this is a real driver's car, and probably the last.

Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...

This is a brilliant shot...
Are you really saying this?

It's a big winged, noisy, harsh, no frills Porker which only makes sense for a high income weekend track day warrior.





George H

14,707 posts

164 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
This looks so much nicer than the GT2RS, I fully agree with the comments 'the ultimate 911'

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

230 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
Cliched nonsense trotted out far too many times already - I've no idea what defines an 'analogue' or 'digital' car and neither have you.

I stopped reading car magazines to avoid this tripe, please don't make this place untidy with it as well.

Meanwhile - mandatory white paintwork and extra 200c cause existing GT3 RS owners to go "oh fk off Porsche..."
Actually, i'd say I do. Having done many miles in supercars from 997 GT3, R8 V8 manual, up to SLS, 430, 458, LP560, Murcielago, i can safely say that I personally enjoy these sorts of car more than the 458.

I drove the 458 like a bat out of hell down my favourite road, and sure enough i went 1.5x faster than anything else. But i got to the end and asked myself 'how much of that was me?'

The same road in a GT3 RS had my pulse racing, brow sweating, adrenaline pumping through my veins and a just wanted to go back and do it again. Every mm of steering input meant something, getting the downshift wrong put it off balance. I was driving the car, not the other way around.

I felt the 458 was like a lighter, nimbler Nissan GTR if i'm honest. From what i've been told, the new McLaren is very similar to the 458 in the way it drives.

The fact is, manual gearboxes are an analogue control system. You provide the input, it's up to you if it shifts well. No new Ferrari or Lambo will come with a traditional stick shift, and i find that very sad. The new generation of supercar is becoming very digital in its control. Example is the 599 GTO - practically lethal with the TC switched off.

An 'analogue' car is one that needs driver input or you won't go anywhere. Fact is, put the 458 in auto mode and your gran could drive it around the 'Ring in under 10mins.

Anh said:
Are you really saying this?

It's a big winged, noisy, harsh, no frills Porker which only makes sense for a high income weekend track day warrior.
Actually if you read the reviews they say it's a better road car than the normal 3.8 RS.


Edited by Beefmeister on Friday 10th June 11:53

Dr S

4,997 posts

226 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Anh said:
Are you really saying this?

It's a big winged, noisy, harsh, no frills Porker which only makes sense for a high income weekend track day warrior.
Did you ever drive a 7 GT3 variant? This is neither no frills nor trackday only. I'm using my 7.2 GT3 as a daily drive, it is absolutely easy to live with day to day. The RS is no more hardcore than that. The ride is even more compliant.

If you want harsh, no frills and track day then you need to go down the Radical (or similar) route...

Murcielago_Boy

1,996 posts

239 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ is absolutely correct given my driving experience of the 458 and the 599GTO (the latter car I just detest)

m1980k

28 posts

161 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
Anh said:
Are you really saying this?

It's a big winged, noisy, harsh, no frills Porker which only makes sense for a high income weekend track day warrior.
So what? It 'makes sense' for the people who have made sure it's sold out. If you don't want noise, wings and something that's not so good on track you can get a standard 997 or maybe a bloody Hyundai Sonata.

What is happening to Pistonheads. Has someone changed the tagline from 'Speed Matters' to 'Boring Cu**s Welcome'?

Porsche997C4S

160 posts

164 months

Friday 10th June 2011
quotequote all
johnpeat said:
Beefmeister said:
Is this the last true analogue car in an increasingly digital age? I think so...
Cliched nonsense trotted out far too many times already - I've no idea what defines an 'analogue' or 'digital' car and neither have you.

I stopped reading car magazines to avoid this tripe, please don't make this place untidy with it as well.

Meanwhile - mandatory white paintwork and extra 200c cause existing GT3 RS owners to go "oh fk off Porsche..."
Beefmeister is right, digital cars are more technology driven with many driver aids to help the car to be as quick as it can possibly be, not particularly with maximum driver input. Therefore an 'analogue' car is more mechanicaly based car which requires more from the driver, and for that reason may be more enjoyable to drive with it having more feel. whether it makes it a better car or not is debatable...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pqI0WavbHJ4