RE: Driven: Ferrari 458 Spider

RE: Driven: Ferrari 458 Spider

Author
Discussion

Beefmeister

16,482 posts

231 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
djon said:
+1

Oi, cheeky sod. No, but seriously, it was terrible, wasn't it?

Spider? wink

Dammit, fell foul of the dreaded Spider/Spyder thing. I'll never be able to show my face in 'The Thread' ever again... wink

JCB123

2,265 posts

197 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
D'you know - I'm not that into it....

Rear mount is too high, it's more like a targa than a spider.....

Also, the back looks too fussy.....sorry Ferrari, after tonights Euromill's, I'm going to opt for a Lambo.....

bad company

18,642 posts

267 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
minimatt1967 said:
This does concern me. I always seem to remember the 'baby' Ferrari being a bit more expensive than a top spec 911 turbo, now it must be getting on for a £100k more expensive, or am I totally out of touch with the Porsche price structure?
The 458 is not the 'baby' Ferrari. It comes in above the California which would be the entry level model.

Lagerlout

1,810 posts

237 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
TimJMS said:
Deranged Granny said:
PH article said:
In a moment of startling honesty, Lanzavecchia admitted that the Spider's thirty per cent less stiff than the coupé.
The Daily Telegraph article said:
Ferrari has strengthened the chassis to compensate, which has added 50kg, but the monstrous power hides the gain, and the company says that as a result of the stiffer chassis, structural rigidity is unchanged.
So who's right?
Important question. Fezza always claimed the 430 spyder was as stiff as its hardtop offering.
Whatever it is, the 430 Spider is very, very stiff for a convertible, it has practically no discernible scuttle shake. So, if the 458 Spider is anywhere near this (and you'd expect it to be better) then this is a mountain out of a molehill stuff.

Twincam16

27,646 posts

259 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
Contrary to the article, I like the fact that it doesn't have a transparent engine cover. That seemed to be a case of 'look at me!' at the expense of the overall aesthetics.

The way the rear buttresses rise up actually reminds me of the Dino 246 GTS, which can only be a good thing.

vrooom

3,763 posts

268 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
I like that, reckon its only ferrari that look good in yellow.

carnut360

127 posts

175 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
when i win the euromillions i will have two!

djon

409 posts

235 months

Friday 7th October 2011
quotequote all
Beefmeister said:
djon said:
+1

Oi, cheeky sod. No, but seriously, it was terrible, wasn't it?

Spider? wink

Dammit, fell foul of the dreaded Spider/Spyder thing. I'll never be able to show my face in 'The Thread' ever again... wink
biggrin

TBH I was agreeing with you. It's much harder than it looks, did you see the first one we did with me in the 599? Pretty poor as well. We might be doing some stuff with the guys from fgear.tv soon so I better get my...teeth whitened, Hammond style.

I know mate. So disappointed, truly. wink

BlackPrince

1,271 posts

170 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
I like it, and I know this isn't the point, but I'd much rather have an F355 and a GT3 RS or perhaps a used 599GTO if they've come down in price at all. I don't even know why but the 458 just doesnt give me that tingling sensation at the prospect of ownership like other Ferraris would. Perhaps its the fact that a manual gearbox is no longer available, or perhaps its some styling details that are a bit fussy I don't know. I do know that its a lot prettier than the gilled 360, or the BBW rump of the 430 but isn't as delicate as the 355 or even 348.

And the Gallardo sounds better imho but I'd feel like a bit of a pillock for picking the 'worser' car. For the money I think I'd go for an LP640 and be done w/ it. A bit quicker than the 458 and with way more drama.

nickfrog

21,192 posts

218 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
The obsession with structural rigidity has replaced the obsession for LSD as a pub topic.

I am no engineer but as I understand it, when a chassis is very very stiff to start with, whether you decrease or increase it by 30% it makes very very little difference, particularly on the road and nowhere near the limit. I think it's the law of diminishing returns in action there.


bubney72

1,104 posts

154 months

Tuesday 11th October 2011
quotequote all
What a beautiful car in every way, looks, performance and soundtrack.

JuniorD

8,628 posts

224 months

Wednesday 12th October 2011
quotequote all
Wow £250K all specced up. Think I'd rather spend that on a Countach, a F355 Spyder and a 911 Turbo Cab with a decent bit left over. Maybe 458 Spyder buyers have all those already hehe

F.C.

3,897 posts

209 months

Friday 14th October 2011
quotequote all
The 430 was a stunning drive, this apparently eclipses it in every department.
If I had 200K handy I might.

bad company

18,642 posts

267 months

Saturday 15th October 2011
quotequote all
F.C. said:
The 430 was a stunning drive, this apparently eclipses it in every department.
If I had 200K handy I might.
If you order now you will have around 2 years to save up.

shazzza187

1 posts

150 months

Saturday 19th November 2011
quotequote all
Overall good car