RE: SOTW: BMW 750iL (E32)
Discussion
urquattro said:
Morningside said:
The E38 iL has parking sensors front and back.
So did the S500, elevating poles on rear wing plus panasonic front and rear, unfortunately it didn't make the car any smaller, you got in a slot but couldn't get out of the car.!Zwoelf said:
You can have a 728i, 735i, 740i or 750i Sport, it was limited to short wheelbase variants, not by engine choice.
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_greydetails...
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_black-detai...
The LWB looks much better/sleeker IMHO...http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_greydetails...
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_black-detai...
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3374019.htm
Think is because the glasshouse is shallower as a proportion of the length.
monthefish said:
Zwoelf said:
You can have a 728i, 735i, 740i or 750i Sport, it was limited to short wheelbase variants, not by engine choice.
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_greydetails...
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_black-detai...
I'd have either of the above, with very great pleasure. http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_greydetails...
http://www.gmscars.co.uk/bmw_750_sport_black-detai...
The LWB looks much better/sleeker IMHO...
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3374019.htm
Think is because the glasshouse is shallower as a proportion of the length.
Ozzie Osmond said:
ludicrous speed said:
This one is definitely not for me, potential money pit, not fun to rag around, canes fuel. But if you want to waft about in 22nd hand luxury then it could be a good buy.
Excellent summary IMO.s m said:
Big too big for my usage and I think the 540i would be what I'd go for if I were to buy a bigger BM. Seems a bit quicker/sportier than this model V12
I bought my first BMW this year, a pre face lift 540i Touring, a 2000 reg. with full service history etc, V8 power is very good and almost economical. After 2.5k miles it is still behaving itself, was properly serviced/checked over after I bought it.These are excellent cars now for £2k plus but there is history re some BMW electics/electronics issue, but no more than MB of the same period and without their rust, ie E series.
david_b said:
One of the Bentley guys was demoing this on a running Continental W12 engine at Goodwood last year - my snap below
Goodwood Festival of Speed 2010 by david_b, on Flickr
You can do that on most anything though. We used to do it on Lexus when the LS400 was 1st launched, then tried it on a Corrolla, then a HiLux. No problem.Goodwood Festival of Speed 2010 by david_b, on Flickr
Balmoral Green said:
ou can do that on most anything though. We used to do it on Lexus when the LS400 was 1st launched, then tried it on a Corrolla, then a HiLux. No problem.
At idle yes (thanks to balancer shafts in many cases, which is "cheating" somewhat), but can it be revved fully and not fall off/over?Edited by Zwoelf on Saturday 5th November 15:26
Nors said:
Cheburator mk2 said:
You are not serious, are you?
The BMW can easily do 20mpg at 70...
The Jag - hmm, how about 15mpg at best...
I accept the Beemer should be more efficient being a newer engine, all I'm saying is, I didn't think in real world driving the "economy" of both cars will be that far removed. If it's 5 mpg more in the Beemer, then fair play, didn't think the difference would be that much!The BMW can easily do 20mpg at 70...
The Jag - hmm, how about 15mpg at best...
Beemer should be miles more reliable though.
Bogracer said:
Owned both the Jaguar V12 is a total disaster, mainly electrics. Short runs pre-HE managed 6 MPG!
Later V12 Jags had much better electrics - the V12 engined XJ40 and X300 cars both have excellent electrics. I'd guess the facelift XJS probably does too. The six litre engine is also significantly more economical than the 5.3.Bogracer said:
Nors said:
Cheburator mk2 said:
You are not serious, are you?
The BMW can easily do 20mpg at 70...
The Jag - hmm, how about 15mpg at best...
I accept the Beemer should be more efficient being a newer engine, all I'm saying is, I didn't think in real world driving the "economy" of both cars will be that far removed. If it's 5 mpg more in the Beemer, then fair play, didn't think the difference would be that much!The BMW can easily do 20mpg at 70...
The Jag - hmm, how about 15mpg at best...
Beemer should be miles more reliable though.
This was a business and pleasure car so it had to work for its existence, it is now being restored, see earlier postings on this thread. Car never a disaster for me.
It was parked under a car port at all times and not left in rain, a real issue for Lord Lucas electrics but iginition side was never a problem.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff