RE: Driven: Frontline Developments MG LE50

RE: Driven: Frontline Developments MG LE50

Author
Discussion

NiceCupOfTea

25,295 posts

252 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Guessing the Mazda 4 pot weighs a bit less than an old RV8?

Rather like this, but strong money...

I fancy a Frontline Frogeye with a K-series conversion!

soad

32,914 posts

177 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Nice looking. Price tag too great.

Schnellmann

1,893 posts

205 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Lovely.

Price may seem high but for a new shell, new engine and drivetrain plus all the bespoke work it probably reflects what is being done and I doubt there is a huge profit margin in that price.

Some of the comments on the price are a bit, er, odd. This is a bespoke recreation and they are only trying to sell 50. So they are not pricing it so it competes with mass-produced cars nor second hand, used examples of other sportscars.

The market determines the price i.e. what people are prepared to pay. So if they sell all 50 then the price was either okay (or maybe too low).

If the quality of the engineering and driving experience is good enough, I suspect they will sell all 50 but only time will tell.

JaseB

858 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
bernhund said:
I don't quite get the figures. My old GTV8 was pushing out 200BHP and had all the bumpers removed etc and there was no way it'd be any less than 6-6.5secs. Is it the gearbox that makes the difference?
I can only think so, I guess a 6 speed box with a quick revvy engine must be the key. Having driven the car in question it certainly feels that quick.

Thinking about the max speed, whether it'll do 158 or not I'm not sure but I did some maths and using a standard BGT Cd figure and a 900 kg weight (which might be a bit wishful I admit), gives 240bhp/tonne compared to a Cayman at 185bhp/tonne which will hit 160, it has such a tiny frontal area compared to a Cayman that the worse Cd figure gets lost in the noise. 150 plus might have been a better figure to quote.

On the plus side I can confirm the MG is still pulling strongly at 140 albeit get a bit light on the steering... Private land obviously.;)

Edited by JaseB on Tuesday 20th December 08:38

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
bernhund said:
I don't quite get the figures. My old GTV8 was pushing out 200BHP and had all the bumpers removed etc and there was no way it'd be any less than 6-6.5secs. Is it the gearbox that makes the difference?
You wont get the figures as they're all computer calculated and I'd bet 50p that they're a way off. Even though the rear end has been improved they couldn't make it a full IRS rear end as it'd affect the legal side of registering the cars.

As in the other thread, its a nice car but maybe at 20k.

Liquid Knight

15,754 posts

184 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
jason61c said:
bernhund said:
they couldn't make it a full IRS rear end as it'd affect the legal side of registering the cars.
The Hoyle engineering conversion uses the original mounting points to fit an IRS with a diff' from either a Ford or GM donor. They also do complete front crossmember with engine mounts for a small block Ford V8. I had a look at the Hoyle set up before making a subframe for the 200SX rear suspension and diff' when I did my conversion. The subframe was bolted to the original mounting points of the MGB floor and didn't require an IVA/SVA test (at the time, they've tightened up legislation now so I doubt it would be as easy now).

edo

16,699 posts

266 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Lovely, until you get to the price, which kills this dead for anyone but the wealthiest rose tinted collector - who would likely want an original one.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

191 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Liquid Knight said:
D-reg?

Brand new shell, brand new engine, brand new running gear, brand new brakes, etc, etc; 1966 registration? Would love to know how the chrome bumpers that were removed for the US impact safety standards in 1974 qualify in the new Euro-n-cap tests for a brand new car today

As the cars are being produced by volume (albeit a limited run of fifty) they should be 61-reg shouldn't they?
I would guess they are donor cars being used (or donor log books hehe ). You can then change 'x' number of parts and with an SVA/IVA still retain the vehicles identity. Hence why they are still live axle and not IRS. That one more change would mean they'd lose the identity.

Although it shows how bloody stupid the regs are, as even retaining the live axle in this case, I doubt there is actually a single part used from the original vehicle.

FWDRacer

3,564 posts

225 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
edo said:
Lovely, until you get to the price, which kills this dead for anyone but the wealthiest rose tinted collector - who would likely want an original one.
Absolutely Nail. Head. Hit.

Can you buy the wheels on their own? The rest is a 50K anachronism.

JaseB

858 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
It is unless you want one and have the money and probably another minter that's too original and shiney to take out on the road, just a thought...

As for the price, what's a heritage shell £10k maybe, crated uprated engine and box plus ECU, loom and other fittings maybe another £10k, there's £20k gone in the blink of an eye.

edo

16,699 posts

266 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
FWDRacer said:
edo said:
Lovely, until you get to the price, which kills this dead for anyone but the wealthiest rose tinted collector - who would likely want an original one.
Absolutely Nail. Head. Hit.
At least I got one half decent post in before the end of the year hehe

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
To those saying it's too expensive - do you actually think they'll struggle to sell all of them? I certainly don't.

Cotic

469 posts

153 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
bernhund said:
I don't quite get the figures. My old GTV8 was pushing out 200BHP and had all the bumpers removed etc and there was no way it'd be any less than 6-6.5secs. Is it the gearbox that makes the difference?
I'm guessing you can't get to 60 in second though. With a rev limit as high as this it's likely possible with some margin.

And it's got a LSD, so more traction?

Mind you, the old RV8 had the Rover lump in it, and an LSD, and that managed the dash in (an official) 5.9 secs.

edo

16,699 posts

266 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
To those saying it's too expensive - do you actually think they'll struggle to sell all of them? I certainly don't.
I do.

r7ehw

127 posts

238 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
As I am moving to Miami in May I am seriously contempleting a classic car like this. Interesting that the first order is heading there too.

Perfect!

E Type nut

3 posts

149 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Hope to get a test drive

kambites

67,599 posts

222 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
edo said:
kambites said:
To those saying it's too expensive - do you actually think they'll struggle to sell all of them? I certainly don't.
I do.
It will be interesting to see then. I suspect they'll be sold out before they even actually go on sale.

vdubbin

2,165 posts

198 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
Given the phenomenal appeal of the MG in classics circles worldwide, I doubt they'll have any trouble at all selling this run.

JaseB

858 posts

262 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
vdubbin said:
Given the phenomenal appeal of the MG in classics circles worldwide, I doubt they'll have any trouble at all selling this run.
I think that's the key - the worldwide bit - plenty of folks out there who had an MG when they were young and are now financially secure and want another one but with all the bugs ironed out or maybe in other parts of the world where the old skool Brit thing is just cool in itself.

That and it's bloody good fun to drive, a right hoot even at sensible speeds, that has to be a plus on our camera filled roads!

XitUp

7,690 posts

205 months

Tuesday 20th December 2011
quotequote all
edo said:
kambites said:
To those saying it's too expensive - do you actually think they'll struggle to sell all of them? I certainly don't.
I do.
I bet you £50k they all sell.