RE: SOTW: Alfa Romeo 145 Cloverleaf

RE: SOTW: Alfa Romeo 145 Cloverleaf

Author
Discussion

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

220 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
madmover said:
B'stard Child said:
Not exactly a looker but an interesting SOTW
Totally agree, nevertheless its an alfa! What more can you say...
....Something like...if you listen carefully, it sounds nothing like a Golf...?
rofl Brilliant! thumbup

Luca Brasi

885 posts

175 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
145s are getting extremely rare around here. Good shedding!

Richard-G

1,676 posts

176 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
bencollins said:
The bodywork quality of this vintage of Fiat group/Renault/PSA rather show up the equivalently aged mercs/bmws/ford/vaux. Likewise the tedious "ooooo Italian design" cliché also gets a good kicking.
well said, in fact it shows up many recent mercs aswell..................

uncle tez

530 posts

152 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
TRUENOSAM said:
Love the 145, just think of what car looked like that back in 1997.

Maybe I'm biased as I did purchase a lovely 156 earlier this week smile
Ive just had a look at 156's. Think i'd prefer this over the 145 and its still within shed budget

http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/3518066.htm

Ferosferio

285 posts

151 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Taras said:
Didn't take long for this sort of word to come up!

The love of alfa's is certainly one of an esoteric nature.

Edited by Taras on Friday 13th January 08:07
Indeed. I can't claim to know much/anything about most Alfas but some of them just 'do' it for me and this is one of them.

Some comments on it's aesthetics are understandable - it's definitely marmite - however I happen to love the way it looks.

Top choice.



effkay

737 posts

190 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I love them, but I'm biased:


tr7v8

7,196 posts

229 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Rollcage said:
First car I have ever seen advertised by them for sensible money!
Interesting comment. I bought my 156 SW a few years ago from them & although not cheap it was fairly priced, these days some of the stuff they keep is very expensive so obviously things have changed.

As for the SOTW I love this & could be really tempted. I like the 145/146 & could certainly live with this as a run around.

lance1a

1,337 posts

199 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I've had three of them and loved them all. Great engines despite variator issues, nimble and kartish. I also like the shape and think it's about as Zagato you can get in a standard production car. The rear end is purposefull IMO. I'd love to have enough dosh to do a mid engined V6 lightweight version with slightly blown arches.

phil1979

3,560 posts

216 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Could well be my old car. Had it for 7 years, and traded it in at Veloces when I got the GT. Such a good car. Would have kept it if I had the space. It took me that long to find something else I wanted instead of it! Needed the 6th gear, though, found on later models.

thewheelman

2,194 posts

174 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Like most Alfas, it looks terrible. I don't buy into all that "passion" & "soul" rubbish that gets mentioned every time an Italian car gets talked about.

marshall100

1,124 posts

202 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Nigel_O said:
IIRC, this was built on the Tipo platform, which means that the Fiat Coupe 20vt engine drops straight in.

A few easy tweaks would get it to over 250bhp, by which time you'd have a sleeper with a bit of individuality.
Sounds feasable. Especially when there was a Fiat Tipo 2.0 16V Sedicivalvole which had the lump borrowed from an Intergrale I think. Another chum from Tesco had one of these and that really did fly.

hiltoa

66 posts

184 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
This looks far better for £790, although I decline to comment on the seller:
http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2011...

williamp

19,265 posts

274 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
thewheelman said:
Like most Alfas, it looks terrible. I don't buy into all that "passion" & "soul" rubbish that gets mentioned every time an Italian car gets talked about.
yes but its based on the Fiat Tipo. And that has a legendary racing pedigree, so it must be good.

I've never bought into the top gear "all Alfas must be great, regardless of how they actually are" thought. And neither did the magazines of the time. Performance car preferred the BMW compact. They are that bad...

Mikeyplum

1,646 posts

170 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Lovely shed!

But I can't help thinking:


p17sut

372 posts

189 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Great sotw!
I had a phase one 145 Cloverleaf and 146ti in my early alfa owning years, then more recently another 145 Cloverleaf a cosmos blue phase two with tan Momo leather.
Love the shape of them, wouldn't chose leather seats again in one though as with the odd driving position you slide about abit.
Would love another 145 at some point!

Alfanatic

9,339 posts

220 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
thewheelman said:
Like most Alfas, it looks terrible. I don't buy into all that "passion" & "soul" rubbish that gets mentioned every time an Italian car gets talked about.
Noone's forcing you to buy into it, but it's not "rubbish".

DeltaEvo2

870 posts

193 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Why get a Golf when you can get an Alfa...

@thewheelman...your comment sums you up biggrin

635csi

125 posts

172 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
I had one of these, bought it whilst still bathing in the glow of Alfa Love from a 1.7 Sprint I had owned in Spain. The former was beautiful and this bread van was ugly, but what the hell. Massive mistake!
The flat four that had been so wonderful with twin carbs on the Sprint was a real let down on the 147 with emisiion controlling fuel injection.
The 1.7 Sprint was not only beautiful but had a swimming pool in the rear spare tyre well, though no spare tyre. It would fill up to a good three inches deep after a half hour trip in the rain or any visit to the car wash.
On the 145 the water feature was less exciting, but given the right conditions the swamp in the rear footwells would flourish into a proper pond. Not bad for a 3 year old car. After 3 months of running around with duct tape over the window and roof seals (which made no difference at all) I got the hair dryer out sold it quickly for cash to a nice bloke (alfa guys are) and still feel guilty now

thewheelman

2,194 posts

174 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
Alfanatic said:
thewheelman said:
Like most Alfas, it looks terrible. I don't buy into all that "passion" & "soul" rubbish that gets mentioned every time an Italian car gets talked about.
Noone's forcing you to buy into it, but it's not "rubbish".
Really, so you think a car has passion & soul? As that's what i quoted as being rubbish.

village idiot

3,158 posts

268 months

Friday 13th January 2012
quotequote all
i forked out over £9k for a 145 1.6l (boxer engine) donkeys years ago... it was fantastic... way more fun than a golf, and very quirky. the only criticism i had of it was the high-set seat (with a sunroof, i had next to zero headroom at 6ft).

that was my first alfa. since then, i have owned a GTV 2.0TS and a 166 V6 Super. The GTV still rates as one of the nicest cars I have ever owned (and that list includes 3x Elises, 1x TVR, 1x Boxster S, a 106 Rallye and so on).

if i could find a nice low mileage cheapish 145 GTV in good order, i would glady buy one again to run as a daily driver.