RE: Driven: Mercedes ML63 AMG

RE: Driven: Mercedes ML63 AMG

Author
Discussion

Aeroresh

1,429 posts

233 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
....I still can't see the point in this car other than being a rich man's indulgence.
I think you've answered your own question!

Streetrod

6,468 posts

207 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
Aeroresh said:
Chris Stott said:
....I still can't see the point in this car other than being a rich man's indulgence.
I think you've answered your own question!
Talking of which, did any of you guys have a look around the various Defender variations that were on display at the Auosports show this weekend from the likes of "Twisted" Very cool they were too if somewhat expensive:



Mrs Streetrod has decided one of these would be ideal for the school run


Edited by Streetrod on Monday 16th January 18:20

gumsie

680 posts

210 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
DJRC said:
The old V8 turbo diesel however, gets you the best of boths worlds. 300+ ponies and 500ft+ of torque. I love ours smile
A V8 turbo petrol would get similar figures no? Just not on the mpg front. It wouldn't sound like the firing order is derived from numbers picked out of a hat either......But I suspect your wallet would end up a little fatter than mine at the end of the day.

amg master

625 posts

196 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
Bezerk said:
Interesting to know where they are selling them (all engine types).
I see loads of Range Rovers and X5s around but not many MLs.
facelift ml63 are like goldust with only 3 for sale in the whole country.

MRCC

337 posts

158 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
Just cannot get on with the looks of the M-Class, every edition has been too American looking in my opinion and this continues that trend. Looks rather ghastly, I much prefer the relatively less-bling more utilitarian look of the G-Wagon. It has the same big stick power but seems less shouty somehow.

Mr C.C.

pSyCoSiS

3,601 posts

206 months

Monday 16th January 2012
quotequote all
Fantastic performance figures.

23.9mpg is seriously impressive for such a big, heavy car.

I really do not like the looks - preferred the previous ML63 AMGs.....

BuzzLightyear

1,426 posts

183 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
I like it! If money were no object, I would include one in my garage. However...

soad said:
A bit like G Class then. Saw one just a day ago.
...in the real world, it would be the G Class LWB with the larger diesel lump for me. I mean, if you want big, this is HUGE and enough oomph to waft about in all conditions. One day - and not dependent on a lottery win.

Numeric

1,398 posts

152 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Not just relating to this vehicle but a lot of the 4x4s in general. Why are they so ludicrously heavy?

I know that for some of the manufacturers these are great money spinning cars often with rather primitive engineering, but surely the time has now come for them to look to reduce the weight rather than just bolt on bigger engines. I know that this is a more expensive option, but it would really improve the breed long term. 2 tonnes should probably be the goal!

Though they can still give us the same engines......

madmover

1,725 posts

185 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Awesome but pointless cars....Id love one though! :P

yellowbentines

5,324 posts

208 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
I still can't see the point in this car other than being a rich man's indulgence.
You've just identified the point then. Is there anything wrong with a car being a rich man's indulgence? If money was no object, I certainly wouldn't want to drive a diesel because it gets better mpg, I'd want the fastest, biggest engined, most powerful car in the range of whatever car I was buying.

bigsillyV10

37 posts

148 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
I have been lurking about on Pistonheads for ages, but for the first time I feel complelled to reply to a topic thread.

I have one of these "stupid" 4x4 things, I take 4 adults to and from work in a rural location 5 days a week, through snow, ice and flooding. I run my sons football team and take him, other players and all the kit here there and everywhere. Me and the family bike, both road and mountain, the bikes and all the equipment fits very nicely. Can you please tell me what else would do this?

On top of all that I love cars and I love something a bit different. I have had so many different cars its silly, and none have elicited the sort of attention this has when you put the foot down, a friend of mine who is a TVR club member said "your house should not be able to go this fast!!"

25mpg is hardly great, but drive something souless if you want thats up to you, I love my 5 litre V10 and until you try one of these things please dont dismiss them!!

Caspian

5 posts

197 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
It's an absolute dog ! Complete waste of time and effort on MBs part.

23.9 MPG manufacturers figures ? Make that about 18 then !

Almost 300 CO2 per KM ? My incinerator's more efficient !

On the road, you can't see past 'em, you can't see through 'em, and you can't see underneath 'em, just the most selfish things on the road, the whole gang of them, from Cayenne to Toerag to Frontera.

The only bloke to buy one will be Richard Head.

Eugh!!!

MC

54 posts

197 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
Caspian said:
It's an absolute dog ! Complete waste of time and effort on MBs part.

23.9 MPG manufacturers figures ? Make that about 18 then !

Almost 300 CO2 per KM ? My incinerator's more efficient !

On the road, you can't see past 'em, you can't see through 'em, and you can't see underneath 'em, just the most selfish things on the road, the whole gang of them, from Cayenne to Toerag to Frontera.

The only bloke to buy one will be Richard Head.

Eugh!!!
Excuse me?!

ojo

162 posts

249 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
That looks a mess - horrible design - give me the old one anyday

ellisd82

685 posts

209 months

Tuesday 17th January 2012
quotequote all
would rather have this than an X5.

wst

3,494 posts

162 months

Wednesday 18th January 2012
quotequote all
My boss has an M class (cooking).

Needless to say, I am not too enamoured with this thing.

Wolfsbait

464 posts

211 months

Friday 20th January 2012
quotequote all
Serious question...

Did PH actually drive this?

That write up stinks of press pack mining 'remote' reviewing...

And the brochure pics do nothing to convince me otherwise.

Come on guys...Getting Monkey on board doesn't mean the rest of you should step down from real moto-journalism!

k-ink

9,070 posts

180 months

Sunday 22nd January 2012
quotequote all
Why is it named ML63 when it only has 5461cc ? What happened to badges meaning something?

CapScarlet

50 posts

148 months

Monday 23rd January 2012
quotequote all
Chris Stott said:
Someone explain the point of cars like this?

They are ridiculously expensive to buy, cost a fortune to run, depreciate like a stone, you can't use more than a fraction of the performance on the road, but aren't exactly any good as occassional track day toys and the diesel version would make a much better job of being a workhorse... they just seem utterly pointless unless you're a footballer or live somewhere petrol costs peanuts (eg; Middle East).
Errr. But couldn't you throw a lot of those accusations at many cars?

For those who can only own one car that needs to serve many purposes then it ticks a huge number of boxes.

I love it