RE: PH Blog: Morgan, it's the new TVR

RE: PH Blog: Morgan, it's the new TVR

Author
Discussion

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
Celtic Dragon said:
So the question is Mr Garlik, which would win your heart your TVR with the BMW V8 or the Morgan with the same engine?
Gosh tough question.

At the moment I'm having a passionate affair with a Morgan while my 'lady' is away. Come Saturday when I collect the TVR I'll remember EXACTLY why we're so well suited and will feel guilty.





............I might occasionally text the minx the Morgan though, just for a little longer.

LuS1fer

41,139 posts

246 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
It's NOT Golf-friendly.

It's a winner!

GTRene

16,595 posts

225 months

Wednesday 14th March 2012
quotequote all
I've owned many M cars from BMW mostly with the straight 6 and I love them making revs...

Then I also have owned 2 TVR's with Rover V8, a V8S and a Griffith 4.3 BV
I really loved that sound when cruising our flooring it biggrin

But...that rover V8 had a very short power band? and so I missed the reving way of the BMW engine...
also the TVR's were a bit scary at very high spoeeds...and the BMW was not so.

Then I bought the Hartge Z3 Coupe 5.0, because I was hooked on the V8 (TVR) sound but also on the reving way the M straight 6 were doing.
The Hartge V8 does both, and a really lovely V8 sound and it revs all the way up, a good mix, also
even when driving to 300km/h it still feels stable on the road.
It also has the very short shift riffle bolt shifting and the more heavy clutch biggrin
Its a real drivers car.

I also love the way the Morgan N62 cars are, especially the Morgan Aero Coupe or SuperSports

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Agree on the very short power bands for TVR's - RV8's being pretty lame in that department (good torque spread) and my two were 500's before I filled the second one in the bin for something more appropriate (i.e. about the same power as the Mog no has).

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
H'm, mine has a powerband that spans from 2000-6500 (max torque @2000-3750, max power @5850 IIRC) which I think isn't bad for an OHV V8. A good LS will likely go to 7 or so (i.e. not that much difference)?

500s are notoriously restricted near the top end, standard, there is not much incentive to rev past 5K or so. Put a twin or triple plenum on top with fueling to match and the power gets held for at least 500 rpm more...

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Pic from last night


900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Pic from last night

Moody... thumbup

Hope you didn't forget to bring the tailpipe silencers from the Chim. wink

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
On tickover it's very quiet indeed. No problem with noise pollution at slow speed smile

toppstuff

13,698 posts

248 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Pic from last night

Looks like you have parked it under a prison wall as a getaway car. Is a bloke about to come over the top on a rope of sheets tied together, to drop into the car and tear away?



snorky

2,322 posts

252 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
M@1975 said:
Morgans can never take the TVR mantle for one very simple reason.... more often than not they actually work.
another insightful comment about TVR reliability from a non-owner...stick to Datsuns...

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
snorky said:
M@1975 said:
Morgans can never take the TVR mantle for one very simple reason.... more often than not they actually work.
another insightful comment about TVR reliability from a non-owner...stick to Datsuns...
Chill - You know he is right though.

LuS1fer

41,139 posts

246 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
jellison said:
snorky said:
M@1975 said:
Morgans can never take the TVR mantle for one very simple reason.... more often than not they actually work.
another insightful comment about TVR reliability from a non-owner...stick to Datsuns...
Chill - You know he is right though.
Yes but you can only say it if you've owned one. wink

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
jellison said:
snorky said:
M@1975 said:
Morgans can never take the TVR mantle for one very simple reason.... more often than not they actually work.
another insightful comment about TVR reliability from a non-owner...stick to Datsuns...
Chill - You know he is right though.
Yes but you can only say it if you've owned one. wink
hahaha.

I'll say it for him then. You really are just waiting for the next thing to break!

My next one will not have the hands of anyone from TVR having lain a finger on it smile

soad

32,907 posts

177 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Garlick said:
Pic from last night

Looks damn good. smile

jellison

12,803 posts

278 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
I like the bit about you 4.0 having 240bhp!

How does the Mog compare to the old spongy Trevor, in the go and cornering oh and build depts?

Most 4.0's are just 3.9 Defenders with a different cam and make about 205 - 210 flywheel bhp unlike the real numbers manufacturers now release for their cars. i.e. the V8 Beemer Mog will have close to 2x the power of the 4.0 Chim.

900T-R

20,404 posts

258 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
Not so quick Paduan... a 3.9 Defender/Disco/RR doesn't make anywhere near the quoted 190 bhp either (more like 145-150).

Back in the day, several magazines over here compared the 4.0 Chim with a Marcos (Mantis?) that did have an unmodified 3.9 plonked into it and they were chalk and cheese, like 8.0 sec 0-62 versus low 5s for the Chim...

I've seen enough 400s make someting like 225-230 to wager that this is what a good one in as-new condition should make. Unfortunately, the vast majority seems to be horribly off-colour these days - blame cheap servicing and dealer incompetence... oh, and ehm 'variable' build standards based on what was on the shop floor that day, maybe?

Edited by 900T-R on Thursday 15th March 12:05

Garlick

40,601 posts

241 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
jellison said:
I like the bit about you 4.0 having 240bhp!
You mean this?



and



smile

snorky

2,322 posts

252 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
jellison said:
snorky said:
M@1975 said:
Morgans can never take the TVR mantle for one very simple reason.... more often than not they actually work.
another insightful comment about TVR reliability from a non-owner...stick to Datsuns...
Chill - You know he is right though.
Yes but you can only say it if you've owned one. wink
nah just based on my experience = 10 years ownership - 1 failure - a 7quid Ford part...

snorky

2,322 posts

252 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
Yes but you can only say it if you've owned one. wink
presumably if you wanted to buy a used porsche, you would canvas Hyundai owners

Lightningman

1,228 posts

183 months

Thursday 15th March 2012
quotequote all
ReaperCushions said:
Cant help but love a Morgan, that shapely rear and that engine are simple sublime.

Although the front can look a little odd wink

Take a photo with a stupid fish-eye lens and what do you expect FFS?

The S1 Aero 8 had the lights from the reborn VW Beetle - they were a last minute option when BMW refused to supply the new Mini headlights to Morgan. This caused the squint with the original car. Morgan resolved this with the Series 3 Aero 8 by fitting the BMW lights; therefore the dodgy photo you've posted is nothing other than misleading. You should be working for Top Gear.