RE: McLaren: the inside story
Discussion
DukeDickson said:
Probably just me though as I've never been able to get my head around the lack of reliability and butt-clenching costs of the more expensive end of the market. A 20k car being somewhat more trustworthy than a 120k one is always slightly confusing to my simple mind.
It's about development costs and how many units you can spread those costs over. 20k cars sell in the millions so you can afford to spend billions developing them. 120k+ cars sell in the thousands, maybe tens of thousands if you're doing really well. Unless you're VAG and working on the boss's vanity project the development budget is a fraction of what people working on econoboxes have to play with.Alright it's not quite a new car company, but it's the first "volume" production model they've ever designed on their own. For the F1 they outsourced the engine and the rest they could just afford to throw money at. For 100 cars gold leaf in the engine bay is cheaper than re-engineering the exhaust, engine management system or redesigning the engine bay, but you can't get away with that in a car that's a fraction of the price. With the SLR they had the might of Mercedes behind them and a platform to build on so they could concentrate on the chassis and powertrain.
Considering how much they've done in-house it's amazing the bloody things work at all. McLaren's real downfall is how they bang on about perfection all the time. They set the bar for themselves so high they'd never reach it first time out, but maybe without such lofty goals they'd never have been as close. Maybe if they'd cultivated an image of a few guys in a shed rather than the world's greatest engineers building the world's greatest cars people would be as willing to forgive the faults are they are with a TVR or Alfa.
You know what? To me McLaren's seemingly relentless drive for sterile perfection, (no matter the actually reality of this particular model launch), actually comes across as a lack of passion for an ideal; how a car makes you feel, and more a focussing on irrelevant minutiae. Not delivering perfection out-the-box is understandable, almost everything can be revised and improved, but some of the basic failings afflicting this model since launch are unforgivable.
Just to comment on the over-the-shoulder "Hi/Bye" moment in the story: I realise Ron Dennis is a very busy man, and you may take the view he delegates this task to others, but a couple of minutes with His paying customers, pull a notepad out, jot down their complaints, apologise profusely for the "glitches" and also that He needs to dash. What price that in how it makes your customers feel?
At this end of the market the experience can't be "just" better than buying a car, not even "much" better, not even different league better, it has to be a whole other sport better.
Just to comment on the over-the-shoulder "Hi/Bye" moment in the story: I realise Ron Dennis is a very busy man, and you may take the view he delegates this task to others, but a couple of minutes with His paying customers, pull a notepad out, jot down their complaints, apologise profusely for the "glitches" and also that He needs to dash. What price that in how it makes your customers feel?
At this end of the market the experience can't be "just" better than buying a car, not even "much" better, not even different league better, it has to be a whole other sport better.
to be fair to RD it was also 6.30 on a Friday evening
I was really impressed both by the facility but also the Mclaren people we met
Here are a few other photos I took on the evening
IMG_8795 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8899 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8799 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8801 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8807 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8809 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8815 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8816 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8817 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8826 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8837 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8839 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8841 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8848 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8851 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8853 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8856 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8857 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8859 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8860 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8865 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8881 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8884 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8899 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8900 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8901 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8904 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8907 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8911 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8913 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8916 by Trax5, on Flickr
I was really impressed both by the facility but also the Mclaren people we met
Here are a few other photos I took on the evening
IMG_8795 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8899 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8799 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8801 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8807 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8809 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8815 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8816 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8817 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8826 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8837 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8839 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8841 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8848 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8851 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8853 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8856 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8857 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8859 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8860 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8865 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8881 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8884 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8899 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8900 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8901 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8904 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8907 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8911 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8913 by Trax5, on Flickr
IMG_8916 by Trax5, on Flickr
wotnot said:
In McLaren's case, not only have they made much of RD's OCD filtering down through the company but they have painted the MP4-12C as the car designed to be a step above 'lesser engineered' examples of the supercar breed. This means their car HAS to be virtually faultless in order to live up to the hype.
That's been my concern all along. Before the car was launched officially they were hyping it (arrogantly) to be a game changer. Inevitably that brings extra pressures and expectations that no company in the world would be able to meet.wotnot said:
As for the boss, it sounds like he could do with a lesson in how to treat valuable customers with a modicum of respect. Did he not know why they were actually there?
TBH the article starts off about relatively disgruntled customers but does seem like they were just another group on the tour programme. I suspect RD just assumed they were people about to recieve their cars. Not the aforementioned unhappy types. It doesn't say if the current owners had any of their issues addressed in the article. So you do wonder.traxx said:
to be fair to RD it was also 6.30 on a Friday evening
5-10 mins could have made a world of difference though. Unfortuantly as the CEO on his salary he should expect to lose 5-10 mins occasionally. But I suspect it was as I said above, he wasn't aware of who they actually were.traxx said:
I was really impressed both by the facility but also the Mclaren people we met
IMG_8816 by Trax5, on Flickr
Who seemingly all sprint out the building at 6.30 on the dot I guess there's a Union at work there.
Not a Flemke (old Nogaro esque) Blue in sight
Edited by Rich_W on Sunday 8th April 18:28
BelfastBoy said:
Interesting read, especially this bit:
"And then a very Ron kind of OCD geekery creeps in, a directive from above suggesting the factory floor should be 99m by 198m rather than the 100 by 200 Foster requested, Dennis having calculated the floor area of the tiles - including the 3mm of grouting between them - and worked out that this would mean none would need to be cut to fit. Six weeks was taken off the build time as a result."
Having done a stint at Foster and Partners architects, I find this remarkable."And then a very Ron kind of OCD geekery creeps in, a directive from above suggesting the factory floor should be 99m by 198m rather than the 100 by 200 Foster requested, Dennis having calculated the floor area of the tiles - including the 3mm of grouting between them - and worked out that this would mean none would need to be cut to fit. Six weeks was taken off the build time as a result."
The most fastidious design practice I've worked at.
Great article and lush pictures of the beautiful MP4-12C
Superbly understated, in a very British way.
Rich_W said:
Who seemingly all sprint out the building at 6.30 on the dot I guess there's a Union at work there.
What? So you expect the staff on a factory floor, who probably start before 8 and probably aren't on huge wages, to still be there after 6.30pm on a Friday night?In my experience, there are many, many people at McLaren working hugely (unhealthily) long hours developing this and other products. To be frank, getting them to ease back a bit would probably be to the benefit of all concerned.
jmcc500
I guess I'm just surprised on 2 fronts. I'd expect the "PUFO" atitude (Pack up, F Off) from British Leyland-esque staff. Not people of the calibre (and passion) that work on these cars. And secondly given McL want to build 4500 units a year is there not some kind of early shift, then a late shift? IIRC the new factory is underground so it's not like they would have noise restrictions for the local residents?
I'd imagine the development engineers who worked the long hours to develop the cars are probably still working elsewhere on that friday night too.
I guess I'm just surprised on 2 fronts. I'd expect the "PUFO" atitude (Pack up, F Off) from British Leyland-esque staff. Not people of the calibre (and passion) that work on these cars. And secondly given McL want to build 4500 units a year is there not some kind of early shift, then a late shift? IIRC the new factory is underground so it's not like they would have noise restrictions for the local residents?
I'd imagine the development engineers who worked the long hours to develop the cars are probably still working elsewhere on that friday night too.
zb said:
You know what? To me McLaren's seemingly relentless drive for sterile perfection, (no matter the actually reality of this particular model launch), actually comes across as a lack of passion for an ideal; how a car makes you feel, and more a focussing on irrelevant minutiae. Not delivering perfection out-the-box is understandable, almost everything can be revised and improved, but some of the basic failings afflicting this model since launch are unforgivable.
Just to comment on the over-the-shoulder "Hi/Bye" moment in the story: I realise Ron Dennis is a very busy man, and you may take the view he delegates this task to others, but a couple of minutes with His paying customers, pull a notepad out, jot down their complaints, apologise profusely for the "glitches" and also that He needs to dash. What price that in how it makes your customers feel?
At this end of the market the experience can't be "just" better than buying a car, not even "much" better, not even different league better, it has to be a whole other sport better.
Pretty much what I thought. Yes, he's busy, but had I been one of those owners my money would be going elsewhere next time! Customer is king! Just to comment on the over-the-shoulder "Hi/Bye" moment in the story: I realise Ron Dennis is a very busy man, and you may take the view he delegates this task to others, but a couple of minutes with His paying customers, pull a notepad out, jot down their complaints, apologise profusely for the "glitches" and also that He needs to dash. What price that in how it makes your customers feel?
At this end of the market the experience can't be "just" better than buying a car, not even "much" better, not even different league better, it has to be a whole other sport better.
If I had to be honest, and putting my "debt hat" on, I'd be reasonably worried that this will push them into serious financial trouble. I really hope they've got their numbers spot on because if they haven't then they'll be snapped up by a foreign power the moment a cloud appears on the horizon.
The factory looks like a futuristic movie's version of a car factory.
Also, while I appreciate that everything worked out far better for the construction of the facility if it was made slightly smaller, I'd be surprised if the better solution wouldn't have been to make it slightly larger. Sooner than later there is always need for more space no matter how efficient you are.
Also, while I appreciate that everything worked out far better for the construction of the facility if it was made slightly smaller, I'd be surprised if the better solution wouldn't have been to make it slightly larger. Sooner than later there is always need for more space no matter how efficient you are.
Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff