RE: Driven: Caterham SP/300.R

RE: Driven: Caterham SP/300.R

Author
Discussion

GTiFrank

625 posts

185 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
This makes so much more sense that having a "road legal" radical IMO. May as well be done with if your making a track car and not bother with making it roadworthy as any radical/XTR must be awful on the road...

abarber

1,686 posts

242 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
How to double the amount of traffic you encounter and WIN at track days.

I'll take a low powered Se7en with road tyres smile Or go racing.

EDLT

15,421 posts

207 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Why does a 300hp 2.0 litre engine need rebuilding every season, it is not exactly highly strung by modern standards.

MrQuick

130 posts

161 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
"with only a starter toggle and a basic brake bias knob to add to the compulsory kill-switch and fire extinguisher lever. Even the steering wheel knobs, Caterham coyly admits, are there more for the look of the thing - the right-hand of the two used for nothing more complex than adjusting the brightness on the digital readouts for water temperature and oil pressure."

Top job by caterham here, no complexity and bullst because all you need in a race car is brake-bias and that's it in terms of adjustablity.

How all motor sport should be.

anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
993RSGT3 said:
GT3 (997.1) couple of track days a year, plus some 2-3k on the road...you're easily up around £4k or so of running costs...The Caterham will defo be cheaper to run
up that to 15 trackdays and theres no contest. cant argue about the sound of that engine though smile

jason61c

5,978 posts

175 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
fbrs said:
up that to 15 trackdays and theres no contest. cant argue about the sound of that engine though smile
Remember;

you cant use it on the road.
An engine rebuild every year.
It'll loose lots of cash, I *think* they've not sold the amount they thought they would a year, hence all the media rides etc.

I'd take the GT3smile




anonymous-user

55 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
jason61c said:
I'd take the GT3smile
yeah i was only really talking about the economics.
only a complete idiot would track the hell out of a 911 wink

juansolo

3,012 posts

279 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Riggers said:
Krikkit said:
What a machine. Suddenly, as alluded to, a GT3 doesn't look quite so hot - one of these, a Brian James trailer and a decent Range Rover would come in at the same cost, yet do everything better.
And how many consumables would you get through in the Porsche??
Slicks are pretty pricey, but I reckon you'd get a season of track days/races out of 2-3 sets of them at £275/set. What's a set of Michelin Pilot sports run on a GT3 RS? Black Circles reckons on £500/rear and £350/front fitted for the Cups. Fuel won't be much different, engine rebuild is the biggie at the end of the year, but I bet servicing on the RS isn't cheap either.
We run something similar on a shoestring. Slicks/wets, get friendly with race teams. They tend to use them for one meeting then bin them. You can get them for peanuts and they've plenty of life left in them for track days.

Rebuilds is a scary one for people. But bear in mind that a track day puts nowhere near as much stress on the engine/box than endurance races. In racing they recommend doing the engine and box (same box) at 80 hrs. Talking to people who run them, provinding you keep an eye on it all, you should be able to run 100+ easily as a track day toy. As you simply cannot drive these cars balls out for hours at a time in trackday traffic. Having helped run a Radical before this I can tell you that the BEC/gearbox rebuilds are required much more frequently. Still don't fool yourself that it'll be cheap, it really wont... So budget for it.

Otherwise they're not that heavy on consumables. We do about 100 litres of SUL a track day. Which I don't think is that bad. The brakes hold up pretty well to the abuse also.

That's another thing to bear in mind. A lot of the tech in that car is built for endurance racing and endurance race cars are properly tough things. We drove 6 months with only one clutch plate and didn't really notice!

They are absolutely, amazingly, gobsmackingly brilliant things to drive. You do have to completely re-learn how to drive them which a lot of time seems to be pure belief that the car can do certain things then when you do it, realising it can go much, much quicker. They are the biggest rush to drive and properly addictive. Honestly the level of fun these things are is just like nothing else out there.

My parting shot is that anyone who does get one of these for trackdays is; don't be a dick. single seaters got banned for various reasons (that I may not agree with), robbing us non-competitive enthusiasts of some proper cheap as chips track toys. DO NOT GIVE THEM AN EXCUSE TO BAN PROTOS! That does mean being super courtious and non-aggressive. You will be massively quicker in something like that that anything with number plates on it, and you're just going to warp in behind them. Give them a chance. Hopefully the Caterham has fairy lights ( best thing we stuck on ours wink ). I'd love to see more cars like these on trackdays, but only driven responsibly. You really have nothing to prove.

Edited by juansolo on Wednesday 11th April 21:14

Krikkit

Original Poster:

26,535 posts

182 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Thanks for that juan - I went for new slicks on eBay to keep it fair in a comparison with the GT3, but I know a couple of mates who picked up the same size slicks for £50/set or less from friendly sources. smile

Hopefully this isn't the kind of car that'll get banned anytime soon, single seaters being banned at most days is bad enough!

juansolo

3,012 posts

279 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
A brand new set of slicks is about £800 (same for wets).

We, errm, get them for nowt more often than not now wink Like I say, most race teams just want shot of them. You're not chasing that last fraction of a second so used rubber is just fine.

Loads of info on my site about the car and running it (on my profile).

Also I keep very detailed accounts of all costs and I can happily say that it'll be a lot less than tracking a GT3 (a GT3 will muller it's tyres/brakes/fuel), but quite a bit more than a Caterham Seven... smile

Edited by juansolo on Wednesday 11th April 22:07

juansolo

3,012 posts

279 months

Wednesday 11th April 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
Hopefully this isn't the kind of car that'll get banned anytime soon, single seaters being banned at most days is bad enough!
It shouldn't as long as people are sensible. To be honest the worst offenders are usually racers that can't turn off their ego. The problem is that they tar all race cars with that brush. It's all really about perception, and I'm trying to spread the proto love wink

arkenphel

484 posts

206 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Wow, that is a pretty sweet bit of kit. Just looking at the running costs makes my eyes water though.... I'm sticking to my M3...

Krikkit

Original Poster:

26,535 posts

182 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
juansolo said:
Loads of info on my site about the car and running it (on my profile).
An interesting read! What are your plans for it this year?

Riggers

1,859 posts

179 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
5678 said:
Riggers said:
5678 said:
What sort of speed did you get up to on the banked turn?
A sense of self-preservation meant I didn't go anywhere near how fast it could have gone.

Caterham tells me you can take it flat which, with the way the SP300 was geared for Rockingham, means a whisker under 150mph. I was doing between 135 and 140mph...
I've driven the track a few times in my old Megane R26 so wondered how fast to put it into perspective!
And what were you managing in the R26? I seem to remember my old Caterham Academy car could take it at about 105-ish...

Baron Greenback

6,995 posts

151 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
George H said:
This looks fantastic, but for £80k it would be a tough call between this and the BAC Mono scratchchin
For me BAC Mono wins hands down!

juansolo

3,012 posts

279 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
Krikkit said:
juansolo said:
Loads of info on my site about the car and running it (on my profile).
An interesting read! What are your plans for it this year?
The guy I co-own it with was made redundant at Christmas so it's kinda on the shelf for the moment. Gonna have a ride over at the weekend and give it a post winter check and run. But otherwise, probably only a couple of trackdays this year unfortunately. It's not eating any meat sat there doing nothing, so we're not going to rush out and sell it or anything like that. We'll try and get one in before our yearly pilgrimage to Spa/Zandvoort at the beginning of August. Other than that, we just don't know at the moment. frown

juansolo

3,012 posts

279 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
doogz said:
Krikkit said:
Hopefully this isn't the kind of car that'll get banned anytime soon, single seaters being banned at most days is bad enough!
Where are single seaters banned from trackdays?

Or do you mean, open wheeled cars can't be on track at the same time as 'saloon' cars?
Yeah essentially that (by single seaters I mean open-wheel Formula type cars). There aren't many TDO's that'll let you bring a open-wheeler and mix with everyone else any more. Mostly just test days these days that you can use them on.

Chris Sideways

421 posts

253 months

Thursday 12th April 2012
quotequote all
I can't see that getting into the 44's at Brands that's the times we used to do back in the Britsport days and are cars were much bigger with more aero the front running Jades Juno's and SR8's we're I'm the low 44's as I remember I think that will be in the high 45's at best.

Riggers

1,859 posts

179 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
Chris Sideways said:
I can't see that getting into the 44's at Brands that's the times we used to do back in the Britsport days and are cars were much bigger with more aero the front running Jades Juno's and SR8's we're I'm the low 44's as I remember I think that will be in the high 45's at best.
Not speculation, fact...

Also, is it smaller than an SR8?? confused

TobesH

550 posts

208 months

Friday 13th April 2012
quotequote all
dapearson said:
Surely this isn't a Caterham. There isn't one pic of it with its indicator on...
hehe